UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities


Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:

 Filed by the Registrant Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
¨
 Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR THE USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12
¨Confidential, for the Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ITT Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:




ittlogobwa2017.jpg


2017

2021

Notice of Annual Meeting

& Proxy Statement

ITT Inc.




ittlogobwa2017.jpg

March 27, 2017
Denise L. Ramos
Chief Executive Officer and President
ITT Inc.
1133 Westchester Avenue 
White Plains, NY 10604

ITT Inc.

Dear Fellow Shareholders:
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604

DEAR FELLOW
SHAREHOLDER

RICHARD P. LAVIN
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

April 5, 2021

On behalf of the ITT Inc. Board of Directors, thank you for your continued investment in ITT. The Company delivered another strong performance in 2020 despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 global pandemic. ITT made continued progress on enhancing operational excellence, including safety, developing innovative new products that are winning in the marketplace and investing in its business and people to deliver long-term value for our shareholders. We invite you to join us at our 2021 Annual Meeting on May 19, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time to be held virtually via a live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ITT2021. Details regarding how to attend the virtual meeting and the business to be conducted are provided in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

BOARD COMPOSITION AND REFRESHMENT

I had the honor of assuming the role of Chairman of the Board of Directors of ITT Inc.,in May 2020 following the retirement of Frank MacInnis, who served as ITT’s independent chair since 2011. We also announced the retirement of Christina Gold at the end of May 2020. Christina served as a Director for over 23 years, serving on the Audit and Compensation and Personnel Committees. Both Frank and Christina were part of the original ITT Board prior to the spin-off of our defense and water businesses in 2011, and their retirements were part of a thoughtfully planned transition that occurred over the past three years. I cordially invitewould like to thank each of them for their contributions to ITT.

As Chair, I have focused on guiding ITT’s strategies for growth, profitability and capital deployment, and overseeing several new leadership appointments. As in the past, we remain thoughtful about Board composition and effectiveness during our formal annual Board and committee evaluation processes as well as through our director nominations process.

SUCCESSFUL CFO TRANSITION

This past year, we completed a successful CFO transition following the resignation of Thomas Scalera. Emmanuel Caprais was named senior vice president and chief financial officer of ITT in October 2020. Emmanuel joined ITT in 2012 as segment CFO for Motion Technologies, eventually assuming a similar role for the Industrial Process segment in 2017. He also led the Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) and Investor Relations functions for ITT and in addition in 2020 was appointed Group CFO. Emmanuel worked closely with Tom and CEO Luca Savi throughout 2020 to ensure a smooth transition.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Shareholder engagement remains a key priority for the Board. The valuable feedback and perspectives received through discussions with our shareholders help to inform ongoing boardroom discussions. We continued our annual outreach and engagement efforts in 2020, engaging with shareholders collectively representing approximately 47% of our outstanding shares. These discussions centered on our responses to the COVID-19 global pandemic, Board refreshment and diversity, corporate governance, initiatives taken to protect our environment, executive compensation practices and leadership transitions. The company’s shareholders also acknowledged our enhanced sustainability reporting following ITT’s first-ever Sustainability Report published in 2019, which was followed by a 2020 supplement showing our continued progress. The Board recognizes the importance of Environmental, Social and Governance matters and will continue to make this a priority in 2021.

Again, I thank you for your continued support and confidence in ITT. I am honored to attend our 2017serve on this Board and look forward to hearing from ITT’s shareholders in 2021. We hope you can join us at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at Meeting.

Sincerely,

RICHARD P. LAVIN

NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

MEETING INFORMATION
WEDNESDAY, MAY 19, 2021
9:00 a.m. Eastern Time

Virtually, via live webcast at ITT Inc. Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604.

At this year’s meeting, you will be asked to vote on the election of directors, to ratify the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to cast an advisory vote related to ITT’s executive compensation program and to cast an advisory vote related to the frequency of future shareholder advisory votes on ITT's executive compensation program.
Attached you will find a Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement that contain more information about these proposals and the meeting itself, including:
how to obtain admission to the meeting if you plan to attend; and
different methods you can use to vote your proxy, including by Internet and telephone.
Every shareholder vote is important. We encourage you to vote promptly, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. We appreciate your participation and your ongoing interest in ITT.


Sincerely,
    ceosignature.jpg
Denise L. Ramos
Chief Executive Officer and President


NOTICEwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ITT2021.

ITEMS OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

BUSINESS

Date and TimeWednesday, May 10, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
PlaceITT Inc. Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604
Items of Business1.To elect the 1011 nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement to the Board of Directors to serve until the 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified.
2.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 20172021 fiscal year.
3.To conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company'sCompany’s named executive officers.
4.To conduct an advisory vote to determine whether futureconsider a shareholder advisory votes onproposal, if properly presented at the compensation of the Company's named executive officers should occur every one, two or three years.Annual Meeting.
5.To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournmentsadjournment or postponementspostponement thereof.
Who Can Vote, Record DateHolders of record of ITT Inc. common stock at the close of business on March 13, 2017 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Mailing or Availability DateBeginning on or about March 27, 2017, this Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting and the 2017 Proxy Statement are being mailed or made available, as the case may be, to shareholders of record on March 13, 2017.
About Proxy Voting
It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. If you are a registered shareholder, you may vote online at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other institution, you may vote your shares by any method specified on the voting instruction form that they provide. See details under "How do I vote?" under "Additional Information about Proxy Statement and Voting." We encourage you to vote your shares as soon as possible.

WHO CAN VOTE, RECORD DATE

Holders of record of ITT Inc. common stock at the close of business on March 22, 2021 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

MAILING OR AVAILABILITY DATE

Beginning on or about April 5, 2021, this Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the attached Proxy Statement are being mailed or made available, as the case may be, to shareholders of record on March 22, 2021.

ABOUT PROXY VOTING

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. If you are a registered shareholder, you may vote online at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card. You may also vote online during the virtual Annual Meeting. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other institution, you may vote your shares by any method specified on the voting instruction form that they provide. See details under “How do I vote?” under “Information about Proxy Statement and Voting.” We encourage you to vote your shares as soon as possible.

By order of the Board of Directors,

lorisignature.jpg
Lori B. Marino

MARY BETH GUSTAFSSON
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer
April 5, 2021

REVIEW YOUR PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS:

ONLINE

Visit the website on
your proxy card

BY MAIL

Sign, date and return your proxy
card in the enclosed envelope

BY PHONE

Call the telephone number
on your proxy card

DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING

Attend the Virtual Annual Meeting and Vote
by Internet See page 75 for instructions on
how to attend

Please refer to the enclosed proxy materials or the information forwarded by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see which voting methods are available to you.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

ITT Inc.’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Wednesday, May 19, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
The Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report to Shareholders are available online at www.proxyvote.com

March 27, 2017

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
ITT Inc.'s Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on Wednesday, May 10, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
The Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders are available online at
www.proxyvote.com




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY07
Annual Meeting of Shareholders of ITT Inc.07
SectionVoting ItemsPage07
07
08
Snapshot of 2021 Director Nominees09
Corporate Governance and Related MattersHighlights10
10
Executive Compensation Highlights10
Sustainability Highlights11
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS12
Introduction12
Corporate Governance Principles12
13
13
Directors’ Qualification and Selection Process13
Board And Committee Evaluation Process15
Director Orientation and Continuing Education16
Shareholder Engagement16
18
Board and Committee Roles in Oversight Of Risk19
Overview of Committees20
Executive Sessions of Directors22
Hedging and Pledging22
Director Independence22
Code of Conduct23
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation23
Communication with the Board of Directors24
24
25
26
26
26
33
34
34
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT35
Role of The Audit Committee35
Audit Committee ReportCharter35
36
36
36
Recommendation Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-K36

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT5
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (PROXY ITEM NO. 3)37
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS38
Executive Summary38
Governance and Compensation42
44
45
48
50
50
51
54
Summary Compensation Table54
55
56
57
58
58
60
63
67
68
2020 NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION68
CONSIDERATION OF A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS (PROXY ITEM NO. 4)71
OTHER MATTERS74
Information about the Proxy Statement & Voting74
Voting Information75
Stock Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders81
82
83
APPENDIX A84
List of Companies Utilized From The Willis Towers Watson Compensation Survey84

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT6
 
Back to Contents



Proxy Statement HighlightsPROXY                          ittlogobwa2017.jpg
STATEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information in this Proxy Statement. Please review the entire document before voting.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders of

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF ITT Inc.

INC.

DateTimeLocationAdmission InformationMay 19, 2021
May 10, 2017Time9:00 a.m.
ITT Inc. Headquarters
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604
See page 52 for instructions

Voting Items
Eastern Time
Location
Voting ItemBoard Voting Recommendation
Further Information
(page)
1. To elect the 10 nominees named in the Proxy Statement to ITT's Board of Directors
FOR
 each nominee
2. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2017FOR
3. To conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officersFOR
4. To conduct an advisory vote to determine the frequency of future shareholder votes on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers
FOR
one year
Virtually, via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ITT2021

How to Vote

VOTING ITEMS

Voting ItemBoard Voting
Recommendation
Further
Information (page)
1.To elect the 11 nominees named in the Proxy Statement to ITT’s Board of DirectorsFOR
each nominee
26
2.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021FOR33
3.To conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officersFOR37
4.To consider a shareholder proposal regarding special meetings of shareholdersAGAINST71

HOW TO VOTE

Your vote is important. You are eligible to vote if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 13, 2017.22, 2021. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please vote as soon as possible using one of the following methods. In all cases, you should have your proxy card in hand.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT:
ONLINE
Visit the website on your proxy card
BY MAIL
Sign, date and return your proxy
card in the enclosed envelope
BY PHONE
Call the telephone number on
your proxy card
DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING
Attend the Virtual Annual Meeting and Vote by
Internet. See page 75 for instructions on how
to attend

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT7
Back to Contents

2020 FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS

(Amounts reported in this section, except per share amounts, are stated in millions unless otherwise specified.)

During 2020, we achieved strong results that reflect continued operational excellence and share gains in key global markets. Our results are a reflection of our hard work and focus on creating value for our customers, while also implementing productivity improvements and making strategic investments to drive profitable growth. The following table provides a summary of our key performance indicators for 2020 with growth comparisons to 2019.

SUMMARY OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR 2020

RevenueSegment
Operating Income
Segment
Operating Margin
EPSOperating
Cash Flow
$2,478
(13%)
$319
(26%)
Your vote is important.12.9%
(230 bps)
OnlineBy Mail$0.78
(79%)
By PhoneIn Person$436
22%
 :-
phoneicon.jpg
Organic RevenueAdjusted Segment
Operating Income
Adjusted Segment
Operating Margin
Adjusted
EPS
Free Cash
Flow
$2,455
(14%)
$376
(18%)
15.2%
(80 bps)
$3.20
(16%)
$372
40%

Organic revenue, adjusted segment operating income, adjusted segment operating margin, adjusted EPS and free cash flow are financial measures not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the section titled “Key Performance Indicators and Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 19, 2021 for the definition of these non-GAAP financial measures, the reasons why we use these measures and for reconciliations to the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Our 2020 results include:

Revenue of $2,477.8 decreased $368.6, including $24.4 from our 2019 acquisitions and unfavorable foreign exchange of $1.3. Organic revenue decreased 13.8%, mainly as a result of the global impact of COVID-19 which drove declines in transportation of 16%, industrial of 7%, and oil and gas of 23%. Sequentially, revenue increased in each of the last two quarters of 2020, from $514.7 in the second quarter to $591.2 in the third quarter and $708.6 in the fourth quarter.
Segment operating income of $318.6 declined $113.7, which included higher restructuring and asset impairment costs of $28.1 and $15.3, respectively. Adjusted segment operating income declined $80.3 due to reduced volume from weaker demand and disruption caused by COVID-19, partially offset by savings from restructuring, productivity and cost actions. Sequentially, segment operating income increased in each of the last two quarters of 2020, from $37.3 in the second quarter to $83.9 in the third quarter and $119.5 in the fourth quarter.
Income from continuing operations decreased $254.9, which included increased pension costs of $108.2, net of tax, from the termination of our U.S. qualified pension plan, a decline in segment operating income, and higher asbestos costs of $64.4, net of tax, primarily to extend the period over which we estimate our net liability through 2052 (i.e., “full horizon”), partially offset by a reduction in corporate costs. As a result, earnings per diluted share decreased from $3.65 to $0.78. Adjusted earnings per share was $3.20, reflecting a decrease of $0.61 from the prior year.
Operating cash flow of $435.9 increased $78.2 or 21.9%, primarily due to higher collections from customers, improved inventory management and cost containment measures. Operating cash flow less capital expenditures was $372, an increase of $106 or 40%.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT8
inpersonicon.jpg
Back to Contents

SNAPSHOT OF 2021 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

As a whole, our director nominees possess a variety of important qualifications, skills and attributes, including those set forth in the chart below:

DIRECTOR SNAPSHOT
          Board Committees
Name Age Director
Since
 Other
Public
Company
Boards
 Position Audit Compensation
and Human
Capital
 Nominating
and
Governance
Orlando D. Ashford 52 2011 2 Executive Chairman of Azamara    
Geraud Darnis 61 2015 0 Former President & CEO of UTC Building & Industrial Systems    
Donald DeFosset, Jr. 72 2011 3 Former Chairman, President & CEO of Walter Industries, Inc.    
Nicholas C. Fanandakis 64 2016 2 Former Executive Vice President of DowDuPont    
Richard P. Lavin
non-executive Chairman
 69 2013 1 Former President & CEO of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.      
Mario Longhi 66 2017 2 Former President & CEO of United States Steel Corporation    
Rebecca A. McDonald 68 2013 0 Former CEO of Laurus Energy, Inc.    
Timothy H. Powers 72 2015 0 Former Chairman, President & CEO of Hubbell Incorporated    
Luca Savi 55 2019 0 CEO & President of ITT Inc.      
Cheryl L. Shavers 67 2018 1 Chairman & CEO of Global Smarts, Inc.    
Sabrina Soussan 51 2018 1 CEO of dormakaba Holding AG    

Chair

*Is a citizen of a non-U.S. country (in some cases, in addition to the U.S.)

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT9

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

We are committed to strong governance practices that protect the long-term interests of our shareholders and establish strong Board and management accountability. The “Corporate Governance and Related Matters” section beginning on page 12 describes our governance framework. We have adopted key corporate governance best practices, including:

WHAT WE DO
Independent ChairAnnual Board and committee evaluation and self- assessments
Highly independent and diverse BoardActive Board refreshment
Annual election of directorsDirector skill sets aligned with corporate strategy
Majority voting for uncontested director electionsFormal limit on outside directorships
Regular executive sessions of the Board and its committeesMeaningful stock ownership guidelines for directors
Proxy access rightFormal director orientation and continuing education program
Shareholder right to call special meetingsProactive engagement with shareholders
A policy prohibiting hedging and pledging of the Company’s securities

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND RESPONSIVENESS

Since formalizing our shareholder engagement approach in 2017, we have reached out to shareholders representing over 50% of ITT’s outstanding shares annually to discuss governance, compensation, sustainability and other matters of shareholder concern. In 2020 we built on this success and continued our robust annual shareholder engagement process, contacting shareholders representing 69% of ITT’s outstanding shares and engaging with shareholders representing over 47% of outstanding shares. During our 2020 shareholder engagement process, we reached the highest percentage of shares owned by our investors since adopting our current approach to shareholder engagement in 2017. The feedback we received was shared with the Board and members of senior management. Key themes from these conversations included our proactive actions to address the COVID-19 pandemic, corporate governance, executive compensation, and sustainability initiatives.

These conversations continue to inform our Board’s actions, including our approach to Board refreshment and diversity, our executive compensation practices, and our reporting efforts on sustainability topics. For example, the Sustainability Report that ITT published in February 2019, and the 2020 supplemental report showing our three-year progress on environmental and social metrics, were shaped by our discussions with investors.

We encourage our registered shareholders to use the space provided on the proxy card to let us know your thoughts about ITT or to bring a particular matter to our attention. If you hold shares through an intermediary or received the proxy materials electronically, please feel free to write directly to us.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

ITT and its employees, customers and suppliers were significantly impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic. ITT’s

Board of Directors and management took quick and decisive action to address the uncertainty created by the pandemic and approved temporary changes to some compensation programs. The objective of these changes was to preserve cash and liquidity during a time of great uncertainty regarding the severity and length of the pandemic’s impact on business conditions.

The total annual compensation of non-employee directors elected at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting in May 2020 was reduced by 20% effective from the annual meeting on

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT10

May 15, 2020 through December 31, 2020 and then reinstated on a pro-rata basis for the balance of their term effective January 1, 2021.

The annual salary of the CEO was reduced by 20% effective from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 and then reinstated effective January 1, 2021.

The annual salary rates of the other Executive Officers were reduced by 20% effective from April 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020 and then reinstated effective October 1, 2020.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee continues to firmly believe in pay-for-performance and has structured the executive compensation program to align our executives’ interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Although 2020 was a challenging year, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee did not make any adjustments to the performance targets for the unvested performance stock unit awards (“PSUs”) and did not grant any special stock awards to executive officers.

Our CEO and other named executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) have a significant amount of their target pay tied to our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) and long-term incentives (“LTI”), which is at-risk pay and dependent on ITT’s financial performance and stock price. Despite the challenging business conditions that resulted from the pandemic, ITT generated record free cash flow and achieved adjusted operating margin that was close to the target that was approved in February 2020, before the pandemic was declared and therefore before the extent of the financial impact of COVID-19 was known. These results drove a 2020 CEO AIP payout that was 86% of target, which we consider an exceptional result considering the downturn in some of our key end markets such as auto, aerospace, and oil & gas. The 3-year performance of ITT’s relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) and Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) resulted in a 2018 PSU payout above target at 159%.

2020 CEO AIP PAYOUT2018 PSU PAYOUT
 www.proxyvote.com
Fill out your proxy card and submit it by mail.

SUSTAINABILITY HIGHLIGHTS

At ITT we believe that improving our sustainability efforts creates value for our customers, employees, communities and shareholders. It helps us align to the values and emerging expectations of today’s world. In 2019, ITT issued a sustainability report which incorporated Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) metrics relevant to ITT, as requested by many of our shareholders in our engagement discussions. In 2020, ITT issued an annual supplemental report which included our three-year progress on key environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) metrics.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT1-800-690-690311
Attend in person at the above time and location. Please bring photo ID.

1



Corporate Governance and Related Matters
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS

INTRODUCTION

We strive to maintain the highest standards of corporate governance and ethical conduct. Maintaining full compliance with the laws, rules and regulations that govern our business, and reporting results with accuracy and transparency, are critical to those efforts. We monitor developments in the area of corporate governance, consider the feedback of our shareholders, and reviewsreview our processes and procedures in light of these developments.this input. We also review federal and state laws affecting corporate governance, as well as rules and requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"“NYSE”). We implement other corporate governance practices that we believe are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

We also understand that corporate governance practices evolve over time, and we seek to maintain practices whichthat provide the right framework for our Company to operate within, whichoperations at that time, that are of value to our shareholders and whichthat positively aid in the governance of the Company. Following are some of our key corporate governance practices:

What We Do
üProxy Access for Stockholders
üStrong and Independent Non-Executive Chairman
üDiverse Board In Terms of Gender, Race and Specific Skills and Qualifications
üAnnual Election of Directors With Majority Voting in Uncontested Elections
üPermit Shareholders To Call Special Meetings
ü90% Independent Board Up For Election
üNo Supermajority Voting Requirements
üRegular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

The following sections provide an overview of ITT'sITT’s corporate governance structure and processes, including the independence criteria and other criteria we use in selecting director nominees;nominees, our leadership structure;structure, and certain responsibilities and activities of the Board of Directors and its committees.

ITT's

ITT’s key governance documents, including the most current versions of our Corporate Governance Principles (the "Principles"“Principles”), and the charters for the Audit, Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital and Nominating and Governance Committees, are available on our website at www.itt.com/investors/governance/corporate-governance. The most current version of ourOur Code of Conduct is available on our website at www.itt.com/citizenship/code-of-conduct/www.itt.com. We have included our website addresses only as inactive textual references and do not intend them to be active links to our website. Our website is not incorporated into or a part of this Proxy Statement. Shareholders may also obtain copies of these documents free of charge by sending a written request to ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Corporate Governance Principles
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

The Board of Directors has adopted the Principles, which govern the operationoperations of the Board of Directors and its committees and guide the Board of Directors and ITT'sITT’s leadership team in the execution of their responsibilities. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the PrinciplesPrinciples. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews themthe Principles at least annually and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors for updates in response to changing regulatory requirements, issues raised by shareholders or other stakeholders, changing regulatory requirements or otherwise as circumstances warrant. The Board may amend, waive, suspend or repeal any of the Principles at any time, with or without public notice, as it determines necessary or appropriate in the exercise of the Board'sBoard’s judgment or fiduciary duties. As noted above, we have posted the Principles on our website at: www.itt.com/investors/governance/. Among other matters, thecorporate-governance. The Principles include the following items concerning the Board:

no director may stand for re-election after he or she has reached the age of 72;
directors must be able to devote the requisite time for preparation and attendance at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings, as well as be able to participate in other matters necessary for good corporate governance;
directors are limited to service on four public company boards (including the ITT Board). If the director serves as an active CEO of a public company, the director is limited to service on two public company boards (including the ITT board) in addition to service on his or her own board;
the CEO reports at least annually to the Board on succession planning and management development;

no director may stand for re-election after he or she has reached the age of 75;
directors must be able to devote the requisite time for preparation and attendance at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings, as well as be able to participate in other matters necessary for good corporate governance;
non-employee directors are limited to service on four public company boards (including the ITT Board). If the director serves as an active CEO of a public company, the director is limited to service on two public company boards (including the ITT board) in addition to service on his or her own board;
the CEO is limited to service on one public company board (in addition to service on the ITT Board). Currently, the CEO serves only on the ITT Board;
the CEO reports at least annually to the Board on succession planning and management development;
the Board evaluates the performance of the CEO and other senior management personnel at least annually; and
the Board maintains a process whereby the Board and its committees are subject to annual evaluation and self-assessment.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT12

OUR BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Richard P. Lavin is Chairman of the Board of Directors and Luca Savi is our Chief Executive Officer and other senior management personnel at least annually; and

President. Notwithstanding the Board maintains a process wherebyseparation of these roles, the Board and its committees are subject to annual evaluation and self-assessment.


2



Leadership Structure
Our Board does not have a formal policy with respect to the separation of the rolesposition of ChairmanChair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and instead takes a flexible approach to that question.Officer. The Board believes that this is a matter that should be discussed and determined by the Board from time to time and that each of the possible leadership structures for a board of directors has its particular prosadvantages and cons, whichdisadvantages. These factors must be considered in the context of the specific circumstances, giving due consideration to the individuals involved, the culture and performance of the Company, the needs of the business, fulfillment of the duties of the Board and the best interests of the shareholders.

Although the Board may determine to combine the roles of ChairmanChair and Chief Executive Officer in the future, since 2011 the Board has determined that having separate individuals holdholding the ChairmanChair and Chief Executive Officer positions is the right leadership structure for the Board.Company. This structure allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on the operations of our business while the independent ChairmanChair focuses on leading the Board in its responsibilities. The Board most recently considered the appropriate leadership structure for the Board as part of the recently completed CEO transition and, taking into account feedback from our shareholders, confirmed that this separation continues to be in the best interests of ITT’s shareholders at this time as well as for the foreseeable future.

THE BOARD’S ROLE IN LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION PLANNING

The Board is actively engaged in our talent management program. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee oversees the process for succession planning for the CEO and other senior executives and updates the full Board in its executive sessions. The Board holds a formal succession planning and talent review session each summer. These sessions include the identification and development of internal candidates and assessment of key capabilities, desired leadership skills, and the ability to influence our business and strategic direction consistent with our core values. As part of the succession planning process, the CEO, working with the Board, also reviews and maintains an emergency succession plan for the position of CEO.

Directors interact with ITT leaders through Board presentations and discussions, as well as through informal events and interactions throughout the year such as lunch, dinner, and small group and planned one-on-one sessions.

DIRECTORS’ QUALIFICATION AND SELECTION PROCESS

BOARD MEMBERSHIP CRITERIA

The Nominating and Governance Committee regularly considers and reviews with the Board the appropriate skills and characteristics for Board members in fulfilling its responsibility to identify and recommend qualified candidates for membership on the Board.

The Corporate Governance Principles state that as part of the membership criteria for new Board members, individuals who are nominated are expected to have significant accomplishments and recognized business stature and possess attributes and experiences such as diversity, management skills and business, technological and international experience. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s top priority is therefore ensuring that the Board is composed of directors who bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, exhibit a variety of skills, professional experience and backgrounds, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders.

Additional criteria for identifying and evaluating candidates for the Board include:

personal qualities and characteristics, accomplishments and reputation in the business community;
current knowledge and contacts in the Company’s business communities and industries;
the fit of the individual’s skills and personality with those of other directors in building a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive;

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT13

ability and willingness to commit adequate time to Board and committee matters;
diversity of viewpoints, background, experience and other demographics;
independence (including independence from the interests of a particular group of shareholders);
absence of potential conflicts with our interests; and
such other criteria as the Board may from time to time determine relevant.

DIRECTOR SKILLS

Our director nominees possess relevant experience, skills and qualifications which contribute to a well-functioning Board that effectively oversees the Company’s strategy and management. All of our director nominees bring to the Board a wealth of executive leadership experience derived from their diverse professional backgrounds and areas of expertise. As a group, they have global industrial and financial expertise, public company board experience and sound business acumen.

BOARD DIVERSITY

The Board actively seeks to consider diverse candidates for membership on the Board when it has a vacancy to fill and includes diversity as a specific factor when conducting any search for candidates. In identifying and evaluating candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the diversity of the Board, including diversity of skills, experience and backgrounds, as well as ethnic and gender diversity. We believe that our Board nominees appropriately reflect a diversity of skills, of professional, gender, ethnic and personal backgrounds, and of experience.

27%
female
27%
racially/ethnically diverse
36%
citizens of non-U.S. countries*
*In some cases in addition to the U.S.

BOARD TENURE

The Board also strives to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure and turnover among directors. The Board believes that there are significant benefits from the valuable experience and familiarity with the Company and its people and processes that longer-tenured directors bring, as well as significant benefits from the fresh perspective and ideas brought by new directors. We believe that our Board strikes the right balance of longer serving and newer directors.

PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING AND SELECTING NEW BOARD MEMBERS

The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies director candidates through a variety of sources including an independent search firm, personal references, and business contacts.

Shareholders who wish to recommend candidates may contact the Nominating and Governance Committee in the manner described in “Communication with the Board of Directors.” Shareholder nominations must be made according to the procedures required by our Amended and Restated By-laws (the “By-laws”) and described in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Information about the Proxy Statement & Voting.” Shareholder recommended candidates and shareholder nominees whose nominations comply with these procedures and who meet the criteria referred to above will be evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee in the same manner as other nominees.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT14

A key component to the nomination (and re-nomination) process is the Nominating and Governance Committee’s consideration of the results of the Board’s evaluation process. The results generated from this evaluation process include nominee attributes and experiences that will individually and collectively complement the existing Board, taking into account the Board’s needs for expertise and recognizing that the Company’s businesses and operations are diverse and global in nature.

Prior to recommending nominees for election as directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and then the full Board of Directors, engages in a deliberative process and considers the following to ensure that the nominee will contribute to an effective Board of Directors:

the nominee’s fit with the membership criteria discussed above;
the nominee’s skills and attributes and overall complement to the skills matrix discussed above; and
the diversity that the nominee will add to the Board.

Biographical information for each candidate for election as a director is evaluated and candidates for election participate in interviews with existing Board members and management. Each candidate is subject to thorough background checks and nominees must meet the requirements of the Company’s By-laws and the Corporate Governance Principles.

BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATION PROCESS

We recognize the critical role that Board and committee evaluations play in ensuring the effective functioning of our Board. Our Board annually evaluates the performance of the Board and its committees. As part of the Board’s self-assessment process, directors complete questionnaires that consider various topics related to Board composition, structure, effectiveness, and responsibilities, as well as the overall mix of director skills, experience, and backgrounds. As set forth in its charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the Board and committee evaluation process. Annually, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the questionnaires and the process and considers whether changes are recommended.

TOPICS CONSIDERED DURING THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE SELF-ASSESSMENTS INCLUDE:

Board and Committee OperationsBoard PerformanceCommittee Performance
  Board and committee membership, including director skills, background, expertise and diversity  Key areas of focus for the Board  Performance of committee duties under committee charters
  Committee structure and process, including keeping the full Board abreast of committee matters  Oversight of the Company’s strategy  Effectiveness of management support for committees
  Access to management, experts and internal and external resources  Effectiveness of risk oversight  Identification of topics that should receive more attention and discussion, particularly emerging risk areas
  Materials and information, including the quality and quantity of information received  Performance of Board Chair  Performance of committee chairs
  Conduct of meetings, including encouragement of and time allocated for candid dialogue

The Company’s Corporate Secretary aggregates and summarizes all of the directors’ responses to the questionnaires, highlighting comments and year-over-year trends. Responses are not attributed to specific Board or committee members to promote candor. These summaries are shared with the Board and committee members to inform their review and discussion. The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, with support from the Corporate Secretary, leads a discussion of the Board and committee results at the Nominating and Governance Committee meeting as well as with the full Board. Each committee chair, with support from the Corporate Secretary, leads a discussion at their committee meeting of their individual assessments. As a result of these discussions, an action plan is created and practices are updated based on the self-assessment observations and suggestions. As an outcome of these discussions, directors share relevant feedback with management and suggest changes or areas of improvement or focus.

In addition to the in-person review of the results of the Board and committee self-assessments, at least once per year our independent Chair has individual one-on-one discussions with each director to elicit any further information about their views on

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT15

Shareholder Engagement
Back to Contents

the functioning of the Board and its committees. Feedback from those discussions is also incorporated into the overall action plan. Examples of changes made in response to the self-assessment process over the last several years include:

prioritizing diversity in the next director search;
increased Board exposure both formally and informally to key executives;
additional reserved time for “Board only” discussions to continue to foster openness and cohesiveness among the Board; and
a coordinated director education schedule to provide additional education on relevant topics as part of regularly scheduled meetings.

The Board of Directors has considered whether to engage an independent third party to conduct or facilitate the Board self-assessments and has to-date concluded that an independent review is not necessary. The Board has agreed that it will consider this option as needed.

The results of the self-assessment process in 2020 confirmed the Board’s belief that the Board and its committees are currently operating effectively.

DIRECTOR ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION

As part of ITT’s director orientation program, new directors participate in one-on-one introductory meetings with members of ITT’s leadership team and other functional leaders. This director orientation familiarizes the directors with our business and strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, human resources matters, our compliance programs and other controls, policies, and procedures. The orientation also addresses Board procedures, our Principles and our Board committee charters. Finally, it provides directors with the opportunity to meet with our officers and other key members of senior management.

The Company endeavors to provide ongoing director education throughout the year. Our annual strategy session, where senior management presents the strategic plans for each of the businesses and the Company as a whole, is one component of that ongoing education. We valueaim to periodically hold the annual strategy session at an ITT facility in order to increase the Board’s understanding of the Company’s people, operations, product lines, and overall business. Our senior management also presents topics throughout the year to the Board in order to increase their understanding of the Company’s business operations, strategies, risks and opportunities.

Directors may enroll in external continuing education programs at ITT’s expense on topics associated with a director’s service on a public company board in order to provide a forum for them to maintain their insight into leading governance practices, exchange ideas with peers, and keep current their skills and understanding of their duties as directors.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Our Board values the views of our shareholders, and other stakeholders, and the input thatfeedback we receive from themshareholders is a key input to our corporate governance, executive compensation, and sustainability practices.  Our

ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM

Since formalizing our shareholder engagement program is management ledapproach in 2017, we have reached out annually to shareholders owning over 50% of ITT’s outstanding shares to discuss governance, compensation, sustainability and overseen by the Board.  Our discussionsother matters of shareholder concern. In 2020, we expanded our outreach to cover shareholders representing 69% of ITT’s outstanding shares, and engaged with shareholders can cover a wide rangerepresenting over 47% of topics, including financialoutstanding shares, which is the highest percentage of share ownership engaged since we adopted our current approach to shareholder engagement in 2017. The feedback we received was shared with the Board and operating performance, strategy, capital allocation, corporate governance, executive compensation, social, safety, environmental and other issues.members of senior management. We believe that it is important for the Company to have a direct line of communication with shareholders so that the Board and management to understand shareholder's views and concerns so that we are better able to address issues that matterassess our policies and practices continually.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT16

FALL 2020 ENGAGEMENT FEEDBACK

An overview of the specific areas of focus for our shareholders during these meetings is provided in the table below:

Shareholder Engagement Outreach Efforts

Percent of Shares Outstanding Contacted:Percent of Shares Outstanding Engaged:
69%47%
Specific Areas of Focus and Feedback
Corporate GovernanceExecutive CompensationSustainability
Board Diversity & RefreshmentCompensation ProgramSustainability Reporting
  Discussed how the Board’s evaluation process supports thoughtful refreshment  Shareholders understood the relevance of our compensation program metrics to our business strategy and acknowledged our link between pay and performance  Shareholders appreciated ITT’s recent reporting efforts, including SASB aligned metrics and 2020 supplement to our Sustainability Report
  Shareholders recognized ITT’s commitment to Board diversity, including gender, race/ethnicity, age, geography, and business experience  Shareholders supported the metrics and weighting of our incentive plans, and the decision not to adjust plan designs due to the financial impact of the pandemic. Shareholders stressed that any discretion applied for AIP payouts should include robust disclosure  Shareholders encouraged ITT to consider setting specific sustainability- related goals, including carbon emissions
  Shareholders appreciated ITT’s smooth leadership succession process, including the CEO transition in 2019 and the CFO, Value Center Presidents and independent Chair transitions in 2020  Shareholders understood the actions taken by the Board of Directors in light of the pandemic to approve temporary compensation reductions for Directors, the CEO, and other Executive Officers  Discussed investors’ views on various data sources and reporting standards
GovernanceEmployeesBoard Oversight of Sustainability
  Shareholders appreciated ITT’s robust corporate governance profile and practices, including our long-standing independent Chair role  Shareholders were interested to understand the actions taken to keep employees safe and productive during the pandemic  Discussed the Nominating & Governance Committee’s oversight of ESG risks impacting ITT
  Shareholders discussed and generally supported ITT’s current threshold required to call a special meeting  Shareholders appreciated the diversity metrics published in the 2020 supplement to our Sustainability Report, and encouraged disclosure of diversity targets  Discussed the Compensation & Human Capital Committee’s focus on cultivating an innovative, diverse and inclusive workplace that engages and energizes people

RECENT BOARD ACTIONS

Board Refreshment: Our approach to Board refreshment and diversity continues to be informed by our shareholders’ perspectives. Recent additions to our Board further enhanced our Board’s skill sets and diversity. We completed a transition of the independent Chair role at the 2020 Annual Meeting.
Compensation: The total annual compensation of non-employee directors elected at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting in May 2020 was reduced by 20% effective from the annual meeting on May 15, 2020 through December 31, 2020, and then reinstated on a pro-rated basis for the remainder of their term effective January 1, 2021. The annual salary of the CEO was reduced by 20% effective from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 and then reinstated effective January 1, 2021. The annual salary rates of the other Executive Officers were reduced by 20% effective from April 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020 and then reinstated effective October 1, 2020.
Sustainability: We continue to evolve and enhance our sustainability practices and disclosure, taking into account multiple years of shareholder feedback. Our 2019 Sustainability Report included metrics reported in accordance with SASB, and our 2020 supplemental report included three-year progress on environmental metrics and introduced baseline metrics around workplace diversity.

We encourage shareholders to continue to engage with us and let us know their thoughts about ITT or to bring any matters to our shareholders andattention. Please feel free to seek input in orderwrite directly to provide perspective on Company policies and practices.  We gain valuable feedback from this type of engagement and the feedback is shared with the Board and its relevant committees.  One recent example is our adoption of a proxy access bylaw last year, which the Board adopted after hearing the feedback from months of thoughtful discussions with various shareholders.

Communication with the Board of Directors
Shareholders and other interested parties may contact any of our directors (including the non-executive Chairman), a committee of the Board, the Board's non-management directors as a group, or the Board as a whole by writing to them c/ous at ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604,10604. Attention: Corporate SecretarySecretary.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT.17 Communications

BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND MEMBERSHIP

The Board and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Under the Principles, directors are distributedexpected to attend all meetings of the Board and all meetings of the committees of which they are members. Members may attend by telephone or video conference, although in-person attendance at regularly scheduled meetings is strongly encouraged. Since March 2020, all Board and committee meetings have been held telephonically or through video conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Board held 11 meetings during the 2020 fiscal year, and there were 22 meetings of standing committees. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and standing committees on which they served. It is Company practice that all directors attend our annual meetings. All directors who were on the Board at that time attended our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders either in person or to any individual director or directors, as appropriate under the facts and circumstances. Junk mail, advertisements, product inquiries or complaints, resumes, spam and surveys are not forwarded to the Board. Material that is threatening, unduly hostile or similarly inappropriate will also not be forwarded, although any non-management director may request that any communications that have been excluded be made available.

Policies for Approving Related Party Transactions
telephonically.

The Board has adoptedan Audit Committee, a written Related Party Transaction Policy (the "Policy")Compensation and Human Capital Committee, and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The following table summarizes the current membership of each Committee:

Compensation
and HumanNominating and
NameAuditCapitalGovernance
Orlando D. Ashford
Geraud Darnis
Donald DeFosset, Jr.
Nicholas C. Fanandakis
Richard P. Lavin
Mario Longhi
Rebecca A. McDonald
Timothy H. Powers
Luca Savi
Cheryl L. Shavers
Sabrina Soussan
   Chair

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT18

BOARD AND COMMITTEE ROLES IN OVERSIGHT OF RISK

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT19

OVERVIEW OF COMMITTEES

The charters of each of the Audit, Compensation and Human Capital and Nominating and Governance Committees conform with the applicable NYSE listing standards, and each committee reviews its charter at least annually, and as regulatory developments and business circumstances warrant. Each of the committees considers revisions to its respective charter from time to time to reflect evolving best practices. The descriptions below of the roles and responsibilities of each of the committees of the Board are qualified by reference to the complete committee charters, which are available on our website at www.itt.com/investors/corporate-governance.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

AttendanceResponsibilities
Meetings Held in 2020: 8
Committee Members
Timothy H. Powers (Chair)
Geraud Darnis
Donald DeFosset, Jr.
Nicholas C. Fanandakis
Mario Longhi
Sabrina Soussan

Purpose: assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee management’s conduct of the financial reporting process.

The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for:

reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements and approving those financial statements for inclusion in the Company’s public filings;

reviewing and overseeing the Company’s selection and application of accounting principles and matters relating to the Company’s internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures;

overseeing the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including reviewing the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives on the Company’s financial statements;

overseeing the structure and scope of the Company’s internal audit function; and

overseeing the Company’s policies on risk assessment and management.

The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the selection and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, including determining the firm’s qualifications, independence, scope of responsibility and compensation.

Audit Committee Report, Page 35

The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of complaints received regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. Additional details on the role of the Audit Committee may be found in “Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proxy Item No. 2)” later in this Proxy Statement.

The Board of Directors has determined that addresseseach member of the reporting, reviewAudit Committee is financially literate and approval or ratificationindependent, as defined by the rules of transactionsthe SEC and the NYSE’s listing standard, as well as independent under the Principles. Although more than one member of the Audit Committee satisfies the relevant requirements, the Board of Directors has identified Timothy H. Powers as the Audit Committee financial expert. The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Audit Committee consistent with related parties. regulatory requirements.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT20

COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE

AttendanceResponsibilities
Meetings Held in 2020: 8
Committee Members
Orlando Ashford (Chair)
Geraud Darnis
Nicholas Fanandakis
Mario Longhi
Rebecca A. McDonald
Cheryl L. Shavers

Purpose: provide oversight of the compensation and benefits provided to employees of the Company.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee evaluates and approves the compensation plans, policies and programs for the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers of ITT Inc., and approves awards under the Company’s equity incentive plans. Its responsibilities also include:

  setting annual performance goals and objectives with respect to the Chief Executive Officer;

■  approving annual performance objectives, reviewing performance and approving individual compensation actions for the other executive officers;

  reviewing and discussing the Company’s talent review and development process, succession planning process for executive officers (including the CEO) and other critical senior management roles;

  providing oversight of the Company’s human capital management programs, including diversity, equity and inclusion programs and management development; and

  approving the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in the Company’s annual proxy statement.

Compensation and Human Capital Committee Report, Page 68

The Policy covers (butname of the committee was changed from the Compensation and Personnel Committee in 2020. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee is not limited to) those related party transactionsindependent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and relationships required to be disclosedthe NYSE’s listing standard, as well as independent under Item 404(a)the Principles and Section 2.10 of the Company’s By-laws. In addition, each committee member is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Commission's (the "SEC"Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Regulation S-K, and applies to each director or executive officer. The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Company; any nominee for election as aCompensation and Human Capital Committee consistent with regulatory requirements.

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

AttendanceResponsibilities
Meetings Held in 2020: 6
Committee Members
Donald DeFosset, Jr. (Chair)
Orlando D. Ashford
Rebecca A. McDonald
Timothy H. Powers
Cheryl L. Shavers
Sabrina Soussan

Purpose: ensure that the Board of Directors is appropriately constituted to meet its fiduciary obligations to shareholders of the Company.

The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the practices, policies and procedures of the Board and its committees. Responsibilities include:

 evaluating the size, composition, governance and structure of the Board and the qualifications, compensation and retirement age of directors;

  identifying, evaluating and proposing nominees for election to the Board;

  considering the independence and possible conflicts of interest of directors and executive officers and ensuring compliance with applicable laws and NYSE listing standards; and

  overseeing the Company’s overall enterprise risk management program.

The Nominating and Governance Committee is charged with:

  overseeing the self-evaluations of the Board and its committees;

  reviewing the Principles;

  reviewing material related party transactions in accordance with our Related Party Transactions Policy;

  monitoring our directors’ outside engagements and administering our director resignation procedures when there is a change in a director’s employment status; and

  evaluating the compensation program for the non-management directors.

The Committee also maintains an informed status on the Company’s sustainability initiatives and on activities involving community relations and philanthropy.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT21

The Board of the Company; any security holder who is known to the Company to own of record or beneficially more than 5% of any class of the Company's voting securities; and any immediate familyDirectors has determined that each member of any of the foregoing persons (each, a "Related Party").

The Company recognizes that transactions with Related Parties may involve potential or actual conflicts of interest and pose the risk that they may be, or be perceived to have been, based on considerations other than the Company's best interests. Accordingly, as a general matter, the Company seeks to avoid such transactions. However, the Company recognizes that in some circumstances transactions between Related Parties and the Company may be incidental to the normal course of business, may provide an opportunity that is in the best interests of the Company to pursue or that may otherwise not be inconsistent with the best interests of the Company. In other cases it may be inefficient for the Company to pursue an alternative transaction. The Policy therefore is not designed to prohibit Related Party transactions; rather, it is designed to provide for timely internal reporting of such transactions and appropriate review, oversight and public disclosure of them. The Policy supplements the provisions of our Code of Conduct concerning potential conflict of interest situations. Under the Policy, an amendment to an arrangement that is considered a Related Party transaction is, unless clearly incidental in nature, considered a separate Related Party transaction.


3



The Policy provides for the Nominating and Governance Committee to review all Related Party transactionsis independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and wherever possible, to approve such transactions in advancethe NYSE’s listing standard, as well as independent under the Principles. The Board of any such transaction being given effect. In connection with approving or ratifying a Related Party transaction,Directors has evaluated the performance of the Nominating and Governance Committee considers, in light of the relevant facts and circumstances, whether or not the transaction is in, or not inconsistentconsistent with the best interests of the Company, including, as applicable, consideration of the following factors:
the position within or relationship of the Related Party with the Company;
the materiality of the transaction to the Related Party and the Company, including the dollar value of the transaction, without regard to profit or loss;
the business purpose for and reasonableness of the transaction, taken in the context of the alternatives available to the Company for attaining the purposes of the transaction;
whether the transaction is comparable to a transaction that could be available on an arms-length basis or is on terms that the Company offers generally to persons who are not Related Parties;
whether the transaction is in the ordinary course of our business and was proposed and considered in the ordinary course of business; and
the effect of the transaction on our business and operations, including on the Company's internal control over financial reporting and system of disclosure controls or procedures, and any additional conditions or controls (including reporting and review requirements) that should be applied to such transaction.
The Policy provides standing pre-approval for certain types of transactions thatregulatory requirements.

As stated above, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the compensation program for the non-management directors and makes recommendations to the Board regarding their compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee has determined doretained Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”) as an independent consultant for this purpose. Pay Governance’s responsibilities include providing market comparison data on non-management director compensation at peer companies, tracking trends in non-management director compensation practices, and advising the Nominating and Governance Committee regarding the components and levels of non-management director compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee is not pose a significant riskaware of any conflict of interest on the part of Pay Governance arising from these services or any other factor that would impair Pay Governance’s independence. Executive officers do not play any role in either because a Related Party would not have a material interest in a transactiondetermining or recommending non-management director compensation.

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF DIRECTORS

Agendas for meetings of that type or due to the nature, size and/or degreeBoard of significance toDirectors include regularly scheduled executive sessions led by the Company. The Policy is re-evaluated periodically.

Code of Conduct
The Company has also adopted the ITT Code of Conduct which applies to all employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer and, where applicable, to its non-management directors. We disclose on our website any changes or waivers from the Code of ConductBoard’s non-executive Chair for the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,independent directors to meet without management present. Board members have access to our non-managementemployees outside of Board meetings, and the Board encourages directors to visit different Company sites and events periodically and meet with local management at those sites and events, either as part of a regularly scheduled Board meeting or otherwise.

HEDGING AND PLEDGING

Our directors and othercertain employees (including executive officers. In addition, the Company will disclose within four business days any substantive changesofficers) are prohibited from hedging and speculative trading in or waiversand out of the Code of Conduct granted toCompany’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options.

We also prohibit our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officerdirectors and Principal Accounting Officer, or persons performing similar functions. We will do this by posting such information on our websitecertain employees from pledging Company securities as set forth above rather than by filingcollateral for a Form 8-K.

The Company has established a confidential ethics phone line to respond to employees' questions and reports of ethical concerns. Also, the Audit Committee has established a policy with procedures to receive, retain and treat complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters, and to allow for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters.
loan.

Director Independence
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board of Directors, through the Nominating and Governance Committee, conducts an annual review of the independence of its members. With the assistance of legal counsel to the Company, the Nominating and Governance Committee has reviewed the applicable standards for Board and committee member independence, as well as the standards established by the Principles. A summary of the answers to annual questionnaires completed by each of the directors and a report of transactions with director-affiliated entities are also made available to the Nominating and Governance Committee to enable its comprehensive independence review. On the basis of this review, the Nominating and Governance Committee has delivered a report to the full Board of Directors, and the Board has made its independence determinations based upon the committee'scommittee’s report and the supporting information.

Under NYSE listing standards, an independent director must not have any material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The NYSE requirements pertaining to director independence also include a series of objective tests, such as the requirement that the director is not an employee of the Company and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with the Company. The Board also considers whether directors have any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The SEC has a separate independence requirement for audit committeeAudit Committee members that overlays the NYSE requirements. The NYSE also recently promulgated rules requiringrequires directors that serve on compensation committees to satisfy additional independence requirements specific to that service.



4



The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. RamosMr. Savi is not "independent"“independent” because of herhis employment as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. The Board of Directors has reviewed all relationships between the Company and each other member of the Board of Directors and has affirmatively determined that all of the members of the Board other than Ms. RamosMr. Savi are "independent"“independent” pursuant to the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. None of these directors were disqualified from "independent"“independent” status under the objective tests set forth in the NYSE standards. In assessing independence under the

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT22

subjective relationships test described above, the Board of Directors took into account the criteria for disqualification set forth in the NYSE'sNYSE’s objective tests, and reviewed and discussed additional information provided by each director and the Company with regard to each director'sdirector’s business and personal activities as they may relate to the Company and its management. Based on the foregoing, as required by the NYSE, the Board made the subjective determination as to each of these directors that no material relationships with the Company exist and no relationships exist which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of such director. The Board also determined that the current members of the Audit Committee and of the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee meet the applicable SEC and NYSE listing standard independence requirements with respect to membership on such committees.

In making its independence determinations, the Board considered transactions occurring since the beginning of the Company's 2014Company’s 2018 fiscal year between the Company and entities associated with the directors or members of their immediate family. All identified transactions that appear to relate to the Company and a person or entity with a known connection to a director were presented to the Board of Directors for consideration. The Board also considered in its analysis the Company'sCompany’s contributions to tax-exempt organizations with respect to each of the non-management directors. In making its subjective determination that each non-management director is independent, the Board considered the transactions in the context of the NYSE objective standards, theand special standards established by the SEC for members of audit committees, and the SEC and Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") standards for compensation committee members.committees. In each case, the Board determined that, because of the nature of the director'sdirector’s relationship with the entity and/or the amount involved in the transaction, the relationship did not impair the director'sdirector’s independence. The Company did not make any contributions to any tax exempt organizations in which any non-management director serves as an executive officer within the past three fiscal years where such contributions exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of such organization'sorganization’s consolidated gross revenues.

BoardCODE OF CONDUCT

The Company has also adopted the ITT Code of Conduct which applies to all employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Committee RolesPrincipal Accounting Officer and, where applicable, to its non-management directors. The ITT Code of Conduct is available on our website at https://www.itt. com/newsroom/publications/code-of-conduct. We disclose on our website any changes or waivers from the Code of Conduct for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, our non-management directors and other executive officers. In addition, the Company will disclose within four business days any substantive changes in Oversight of Risk

The Board of Directors is charged with oversightor waivers of the Company's risk management policiesCode of Conduct granted to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and practicesPrincipal Accounting Officer, or persons performing similar functions. We intend to do this by posting such information on our website as set forth above rather than by filing a Form 8-K with the objective of ensuring that appropriate risk management systems are employed throughout the Company. ITT faces a broad array of risks, including market, operational, strategic, legal, political, international and financial risks. The Board monitors overall corporate performance, the integrity of the Company's financial controls and the effectiveness of its legal compliance and enterprise risk management programs, risk governance practices and risk mitigation efforts. The Board receives reports from management on risk matters in the context of the Company's annual strategy session and strategic planning reviews, the annual operating plan and budget reviews and business reports and other updates provided at meetings of the Board. The various committees of the Board also participate in oversight of the Company's risk management efforts and report to the full Board for consideration and action when appropriate. SEC.

The Company has established a cross-functional teamconfidential ethics phone line and website to respond to employees’ questions and reports of members of management referred to as the Risk Center of Excellence ("RCOE"), to internally monitor various risks. Each committee of the Board receives regular reports from the RCOE within the relevant expertise of that committee. For example, the Compensation and Personnel Committee reviews and assesses compensation and incentive program risks to ensure that the Company's compensation programs encourage innovation and balance appropriate business risks and rewards without encouraging risk-taking behaviors that may have a material adverse effect on the Company, and it receives an annual report from the RCOE evaluating these risks. In addition to its duties in assessing major financial risk exposures,ethical concerns. Also, the Audit Committee also provides oversighthas established a policy with procedures to receive, retain and treat complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters, and to allow for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company's policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of the members of the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee during 20162020 or as of the date of this Proxy Statement havehas been an officer or employee of the Company and no executive officer of the Company served on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed any member of our Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee or Board of Directors.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT23


5



Director SelectionCOMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Shareholders and Composition

In fulfilling its responsibilityother interested parties may contact any of our directors (including the non-executive Chair), a committee of the Board, the Board’s non-management directors as a group, or the Board as a whole by writing to identify and recommendthem c/o ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Communications are distributed to the Board, or to any individual director(s), as appropriate under the facts and circumstances. Junk mail, advertisements, product inquiries or complaints, resumes, spam and surveys are not forwarded to the Board. Material that is threatening, unduly hostile or similarly inappropriate will also not be forwarded, although any non-management director may request that any communications that have been excluded be made available.

POLICIES FOR APPROVING RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Board has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) that addresses the reporting, review and approval or ratification of Directors qualified candidatestransactions with related parties. The Policy covers (but is not limited to) those related party transactions and relationships required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K, and applies to each director or executive officer of the Company, any nominee for membershipelection as a director of the Company, any security holder who is known to the Company to own of record or beneficially more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, and any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons (each, a “Related Party”).

The Company recognizes that transactions with Related Parties may involve potential or actual conflicts of interest and pose the risk that they may be, or be perceived to have been, based on considerations other than the Board,Company’s best interests. Accordingly, as a general matter, the Company seeks to avoid such transactions. However, the Company recognizes that in some circumstances transactions between Related Parties and the Company may be incidental to the normal course of business, may provide an opportunity that is in the best interests of the Company to pursue, or may not otherwise be inconsistent with the best interests of the Company. In other cases it may be inefficient for the Company to pursue an alternative transaction. The Policy therefore is not designed to prohibit Related Party transactions; rather, it is designed to provide for timely internal reporting of such transactions and appropriate review, oversight and public disclosure of them. The Policy supplements the provisions of our Code of Conduct concerning potential conflict of interest situations. Under the Policy, an amendment to an arrangement that is considered a Related Party transaction is, unless clearly incidental in nature, considered a separate Related Party transaction.

The Policy provides for the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into accountto review all Related Party transactions and, wherever possible, to approve such transactions in advance of any such transaction being given effect. In connection with approving or ratifying a variety of factors. Directors of the Company must be persons of integrity, with significant accomplishments and recognized business stature. In addition, the Principles state that as part of the membership criteria for new Board members, individuals must possess such attributes and experiences as are necessary to provide a broad range of personal characteristics including diversity, management skills and business, technological and international experience, among others. The Nominating and Governance Committee's top priority is therefore ensuring that the Board is composed of directors who bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, exhibit a variety of skills, professional experience and backgrounds, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders. The Board actively seeks to consider diverse candidates for membership on the Board when it has a vacancy to fill and includes diversity as a specific factor when conducting any search for candidates.

As part of its process in identifying new candidates to join the Board,Related Party transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers, in light of the relevant facts and circumstances, whether and to what extent,or not the candidate's attributes and experiences will individually and collectively complement the existing Board, evaluating the current Board's needs for expertise and recognizing that ITT's businesses and operations are diverse and globaltransaction is in, nature and that needs can change over time. On an annual basis, as part of its self-evaluation, the full Board of Directors assesses whether its overall mix of directors is appropriate for the Company.
Board recruitment is an ongoing process and the Board strives to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure, turnover, diversity and skills on the Board. The Board believes that there are significant benefits from the valuable experience and familiarityor consistent with, the best interests of the Company, and its people and processesincluding, as applicable, consideration of the following factors:

the position within or relationship of the Related Party with the Company;
the materiality of the transaction to the Related Party and the Company, including the dollar value of the transaction, without regard to profit or loss;
the business purpose for and reasonableness of the transaction, taken in the context of the alternatives available to the Company for attaining the purposes of the transaction;
whether the transaction is comparable to a transaction that could be available on an arms-length basis or is on terms that the Company offers generally to persons who are not Related Parties;
whether the transaction is in the ordinary course of our business and was proposed and considered in the ordinary course of business; and
the effect of the transaction on our business and operations, including on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and system of disclosure controls or procedures, and any additional conditions or controls (including reporting and review requirements) that should be applied to such transaction.

The Policy provides standing pre-approval for certain types of transactions that longer-tenured directors bring, as well as significant benefits from the fresh perspective and ideas brought by new directors. Since the beginning of 2013, we have added five new independent directors who have brought valuable and varied experience to our Board.

Prior to recommending nominees for election as directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee engageshas determined do not pose a significant risk of conflict of interest, either because a Related Party would not have a material interest in a deliberative, evaluative processtransaction of that type or due to ensure each nominee possesses the skills and attributes that individually and collectively will contributenature, size and/or degree of significance to an effective board of directors. Biographical information for each candidate for election as a directorthe Company. The Policy is evaluated and candidates for election participate in interviews with existing Board members and management. Each candidate is subject to thorough background checks and nominees must meet the requirements of the Company's Amended and Restated By-laws (the "By-laws") and the Principles. Director nominees must be willing to commit the requisite time for preparation and attendance at regularly scheduled board and committee meetings and participation in other matters necessary for good corporate governance.re-evaluated periodically.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT24

Back to Contents
During 2016, eleven individuals served on ITT's Board, including a new independent director, Nicholas C. Fanandakis, who was elected on October 20, 2016. Of the 10 directors who are nominees for election at the Annual Meeting, three are female, and one is African American. The directors come from diverse professional backgrounds and industries, including manufacturing, financial and technology. In "Election of Directors (Proxy Item No. 1)" we provide an overview of the background of each nominee, including their principal occupation, business experience and other directorships, together with the key attributes, experience and skills viewed as most meaningful in providing value to the Board, our Company and our shareholders.
                 picture4.jpg

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY

At ITT, we know that improving our sustainability efforts creates value for our customers, employees, communities and shareholders. It helps us align to the values and emerging expectations of today’s world.

The Board also understands that sustainability is a key focus for investors and takes investor feedback on sustainability seriously. We continue to evaluate which ESG factors pose the most material risks to the Company and create the strongest opportunities to enhance our bottom line and sustain long-term financial value.

ITT uses discussions with shareholders to better understand how investors view this topic, including emerging reporting standards, the various data sources available, and peer reporting.

We also use these shareholder engagement opportunities to discuss the Company’s current sustainability focus areas and recent developments. Our 2019 Sustainability Report was informed by those discussions with investors. The Sustainability Report incorporated the SASB metrics relevant to the Company, as requested by many of our shareholders in our engagement discussions. We also published an annual supplemental report during 2020 which included our three-year progress on key environmental and social metrics.

Our governance processes and policies are designed to provide appropriate oversight of sustainability and inform our Board about significant ESG issues impacting the Company. These policies and processes, as well as areas of focus most relevant given our business and industry, are informed by proactive engagement with our shareholders as well as other stakeholders, including the SASB.

The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies director candidates through a variety of sources including personal references and business contacts. On occasion, the Nominating and Governance Committee utilizes a search firm to identify and screen director candidates and pays a fee to that firm for each such candidate elected to the ITT Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider director nominees recommended by shareholders. Shareholders who wish to recommend candidates may contact the Nominating and Governance Committee in the manner described in "Communication with the Board of Directors." Shareholder nominations must be made according to the procedures required by our By-laws and described in this Proxy Statement under the heading "Information about the Proxy Statement & Voting." Shareholder-recommended candidates and shareholder nominees whose nominations comply with these procedures and who meet the criteria referred to above will be evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee in the same manner as other nominees.

Director Orientation and Continuing Education
As part of ITT's director orientation program, new directors participate in one-on-one introductory meetings with members of ITT's leadership team and other functional leaders. This director orientation familiarizes the directors with our business and strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, human


6



resources matters, our compliance programs and other controls, policies and procedures. The orientation also addresses Board procedures, our corporate governance principles and our Board committee charters. Finally, it provides directors with the opportunity to meet with our officers and other key members of management.
The Company endeavors to provide ongoing director education throughout the year. Our annual strategy session, where senior management presents the strategic plans for each of the businesses and the Company as a whole, is one component of that ongoing education. We aim to periodically hold the annual strategy session at an ITT facilityCompensation and Human Capital Committees have primary responsibility for sustainability-related topics. The Board also receives periodic reports from our internal ESH&S group in order to increase the Board's understandingstay apprised of the Company's people, operations, product lines andCompany’s overall business. Our senior management also presents topics throughout the yearapproach to the Board in order to increase their understanding of the Company's business operations, strategies, risks and opportunities.
Directors may also enroll in external director continuing education programs at ITT's expense on topics associated with a director's service on a public company board in order to provide a forum for them to maintain their insight into leading governance practices, exchange ideas with peers and keep current their skills and understanding of their duties as a director.
Executive Sessions of Directors
Agendas for meetings of the Board of Directors include regularly scheduled executive sessions led by the Board's non-executive Chairman for the independent directors to meet without management present. Board members have access to our employees outside of Board meetings, and the Board encourages directors to visit different Company sites and events periodically and meet with local management at those sites and events, either as part of a regularly scheduled Board meeting or otherwise.
Board and Committee Meetings and Membership
The Board of Directors and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Under the Principles, directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board and all meetings of the committees of which they are members. Members may attend by telephone or video conference to mitigate conflicts, although in-person attendance at regularly scheduled meetings is strongly encouraged. The Board of Directors held nine meetings during the 2016 fiscal year and there were 21 meetings of standing committees. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and standing committees on which they served. It is Company practice that all directors attend our annual meetings. All directors who were on the Board at that time attended our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders either in person or telephonically.
The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Personnel Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The following table summarizes the current membership of each Committee:
these matters.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT25

NameAudit
Compensation
and Personnel
Nominating and
Governance
Orlando D. Ashfordüü
G. Peter D'Aloiaü
Geraud Darnisü
Donald DeFosset, Jr.üü
Nicholas C. Fanandakisü
Christina A. GoldüChair
Richard P. Lavinüü
Frank T. MacInnisChair
Rebecca A. McDonaldüü
Timothy H. PowersChairü
Denise L. Ramos 
Overview of Committees
The charters of each of the Audit, Compensation and Personnel and Nominating and Governance Committees conform with the applicable NYSE listing standards, and each committee periodically reviews its charter, as regulatory developments and business circumstances warrant. Each of the committees considers revisions to their respective charters from time to time to reflect evolving best practices.


7



Audit Committee
Back to Contents
Committee Chair
Timothy H. Powers
(appointed February 17, 2017)

Current Committee Members
• Timothy H. Powers
• G. Peter D'Aloia
• Geraud Darnis
• Nicholas C. Fanandakis
   (appointed October 20, 2016)
• Christina A. Gold
• Rebecca A. McDonald

Number of Meetings Held in 2016: 10

Page 18
Purpose: to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee management's conduct of the financial reporting process.

Responsibilities of the Audit Committee include:
select and oversee the independent registered public accounting firm, including determining the independent auditor's qualifications, independence, scope of responsibility and compensation;
• review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements and approve those financial statements for inclusion in the Company's public filings;
• review and oversee the Company's selection and application of accounting principles and issues relating to the Company's internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures;
• oversee of the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including reviewing the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives on the Company's financial statements;
• oversee the structure and scope of the Company's internal audit function; and
• assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight of enterprise risk management, particularly through oversight of the Company's policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management and the Company's major financial risk exposures.
The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of complaints received regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. Additional details on the role of the Audit Committee may be found in "Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proxy Item No. 2)" later in this Proxy Statement.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and the NYSE's listing standard, as well as independent under the Principles. Although more than one member of the Board of Directors satisfies the relevant requirements, the Board of Directors has identified Timothy H. Powers as the audit committee financial expert. The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Audit Committee consistent with regulatory requirements.

Compensation and Personnel Committee
Committee Chair
Christina A. Gold

Current Committee Members
• Christina A. Gold
• Orlando D. Ashford
• Donald DeFosset, Jr.
• Richard P. Lavin
• Rebecca A. McDonald

Number of Meetings Held
in 2016: 5

Page 49
Purpose: to provide oversight review of compensation and benefits of the employees of the Company.
Responsibilities of the Compensation and Personnel Committee include:
• oversee and administer the Company's employee compensation programs, including incentive plans and equity-based compensation plans;
• establish annual performance objectives, evaluate performance and approve individual compensation actions for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;
• review and discuss the Company's talent review and development process, succession planning process for senior executive positions and aspects of culture and diversity for the Company;
• review, discuss and approval of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in the Company's annual proxy statement;
• assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight of enterprise risk management, particularly risks in connection with the Company's compensation and talent management programs; and
• lead the Company's chief executive officer succession process.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation and Personnel Committee is independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and the NYSE's listing standard, as well as independent under the Principles. In addition, each committee member is a "non-employee director" as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and an "outside director" as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Compensation and Personnel Committee consistent with regulatory requirements.


8

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(PROXY ITEM NO. 1)



Nominating and Governance Committee
Committee Chair
Frank T. MacInnis

Current Committee Members
• Frank T. MacInnis
• Orlando D. Ashford
• Donald DeFosset, Jr.
• Richard P. Lavin
• Timothy H. Powers

Number of Meetings Held
in 2016: 6
Purpose: to ensure that the Board of Directors is appropriately constituted to meet its fiduciary obligations to shareholders of the Company.

Responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee include:
• evaluate the size, composition, governance and structure of the Board and the qualifications, compensation and retirement age of directors;
• identify, evaluate and propose nominees for election to the Board of Directors;
• consider independence and possible conflicts of interest of directors and executive officers and ensuring compliance with applicable laws and NYSE listing standards;
• review and oversee of the corporate governance principles for the Company;
• review of material related party transactions in accordance with the Company's Related Party Transactions policy; and
• assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee enterprise risk management, particularly risks in connection with the Company's corporate governance structures and processes and risks related to other primarily nonfinancial matters (for example, business continuity planning).
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and the NYSE's listing standard, as well as independent under the Principles. The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Nominating and Governance Committee consistent with regulatory requirements.
As stated above, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the compensation program for the non-management directors and makes recommendations to the Board regarding their compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee has retained Pay Governance LLC ("Pay Governance") as an independent consultant for this purpose. Pay Governance's responsibilities include providing market comparison data on non-management director compensation at peer companies, tracking trends in non-management director compensation practices, and advising the Nominating and Governance Committee regarding the components and levels of non-management director compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee is not aware of any conflict of interest on the part of Pay Governance arising from these services or any other factor that would impair Pay Governance's independence. Executive officers do not play any role in either determining or recommending non-management director compensation.
Election of Directors (Proxy Item No. 1)
Ten members of our Board are standing for re-election, to hold office until the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders. As a whole, our director nominees possess a variety of important qualifications, skills and attributes, including those set forth below in the following table.
Snapshot of 2017 Director Nominees
capture12.jpg


9



ELECTION PROCEDURES

Each director must be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders represented in personat the virtual meeting or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A "majority“majority of the votes cast"cast” means that the number of votes cast "for"“for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast "against"“against” that director (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast with respect to that director). In a contested election for directordirectors (an election in which the number of nominees for election as directordirectors is greater than the number of directors to be elected), the vote standard would be a plurality of votes cast.

In accordance with our By-laws and Corporate Governancethe Principles, the Board will only nominate director candidates who agree to tender an irrevocable resignation promptly following their failure to receive the required vote for re-election in an uncontested election. In addition, the Board will fill director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender the same form of resignation promptly following their appointment to the Board.

If an incumbent director fails to receive the required vote for re-election in an uncontested election and submits his or her resignation to the ChairmanChair of the Board or the Corporate Secretary, then the Nominating and Governance Committee (or the equivalent committee then in existence) shall promptly consider the resignation and all relevant facts and circumstances concerning any vote and the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. After such consideration, the Nominating and Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board regarding whether the resignation should be accepted or rejected, or whether any other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Committee'sCommittee’s recommendation no later than its next regularly scheduled Board meeting (after certification of the shareholder vote) or within 90 days after certification of the shareholder vote, whichever is earlier, and the Board will promptly publicly disclose its decision and the reasons for its decision.

Each nominee elected as a director will continue in office until the earlier of the 2018 annual meeting2022 Annual Meeting of shareholders,Shareholders, his or her successor having been duly elected and qualified, or his or her death, resignation or removal.

The 1011 nominees for election to the Board in 20172021 have agreed to serve if elected, and management has no reason to believe that such nominees will be unavailable to serve. In the event that any of the nominees is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, then the persons named as proxies may vote for a substitute nominee chosen by the present Board to fill the vacancy. Alternatively, the Board may reduce the size of the Board of Directors. The individuals named as proxies in the proxy card intend to vote theyour proxy (if you are a shareholder of record) FOR the election of each of these nominees, unless you indicate otherwise on the proxy card.

One

2021 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Eleven members of our currentBoard are standing for election to hold office until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

We believe our 2021 director nominees evidence our commitment to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure, turnover, diversity and skills on the Board. Of the 11 directors Mr. D'Aloia, will retirewho are nominees for election at the Annual Meeting, three are female, three are racially or ethnically diverse, and four are citizens of a non-U.S. country (in some cases, in addition to the U.S.). As discussed in detail in our nominees’ biographies, the nominees come from diverse professional backgrounds and industries, including manufacturing, finance and technology. Each of our 2021 director nominees was recommended for election by the Company's Board effective May 10, 2017, which isNominating and Governance Committee, and such recommendation was approved unanimously by the end of his term, in accordance with the requirement in the Corporate Governance Principles that no director shall stand for reelection after he or she has reached the age of 72.Board.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT    26

The principal occupation and certain other biographical information about the nominees is set forth on the following pages.



10



ORLANDO D. ASHFORD

Age: 52

Director since:

December 2011

ExecutiveChairman ofAzamara

orlandodashforda01.jpg

CAREER:

Orlando D. Ashford


Presidentserves as Executive Chairman of Holland
America Line


Career

Orlando D. Ashford hasAzamara. He previously served as the President of Holland AmericaLine, a division of Carnival Corporation, since December 2014.until May 2020. Previously, Mr. Ashford was the President of the Talent business segment at Mercer, a global consulting leader and subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies ("Marsh"(“Marsh”). From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Ashford was the Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Communications Officer for Marsh. Prior to joining Marsh in 2008, Mr. Ashford served as Group Director of Human Resources for Eurasia and Africa for the Coca-Cola Company and as Vice President of Global Human Resources Strategy and Organizational Development for Motorola, Inc. He has also held leadership positions with Mercer Delta Consulting, Ameritech and Andersen Consulting. Mr. Ashford serves on the board of directors for the Executive Leadership Council as Chairman and the Seattle chapter of the Positive Coaching Alliance. He also serves on advisory boards for Purdue University SchoolAlliance and Year Up. Mr. Ashford is currently a director of Technologythe following public companies: Array Technologies, Inc. and the NFL Players Association.

Perrigo Company plc.

Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT
REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Mr. Ashford for director of the Company, the Board considered his expertise in addressing talent, culture and human capital issues at the executive level, as well as his significant experience in multinational organizations, providing experience and skills relevant to the Company'sCompany’s international sales operations.

BOARD COMMITTEES:

■  Compensation and Human Capital Committee (Chair)

■  Nominating and Governance Committee

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

■  Array Technologies, Inc.

■  Perrigo Company plc

GERAUD DARNIS

Age: 48


61

Director Since: since:

October 2015

FormerDecember 2011


Board Committees:
• Compensation & Personnel Committee
• Nominating & Governance Committee

gerauddarnis.jpg
Geraud Darnis

Former President &
CEO of UTCBuilding
&IndustrialSystems



CAREER:

Career


Geraud Darnis servedretired from United Technologies (now Raytheon Technologies) in December 2015 as the President & ChiefExecutive Officer of UTC Building & Industrial Systems, the world's largest provider of high-technology building systems, whose brands include Otis, Carrier, Chubb, Kidde and Automated Logic from September 2013 to December 2015. UTC Building & Industrial Systems is a unitSystems. In this role, Mr. Darnis led all of United Technologies Corporation.non-aerospace activities, including Carrier Corp. and Otis Elevator which were later spun-off to become independent publicly traded companies. Mr. Darnis served as thestarted his career at UTC in 1983 in France and held a number of general management and financial positions stationed in Latin America, Europe and Asia until 2001 when he was named President of Carrier Corp. In 2011, UTC’s Fire and Security businesses were added to his portfolio when he became President and Chief Executive Officer of UTC Climate Controls and Security from September 2011 to September 2013.Security. In 2001,2013, Mr. Darnis also assumed the leadership of Otis when he served briefly as Presidentbecame president and CEO of UTC Power before being named President of Carrier, a position he held until 2011 when CarrierBuilding and UTC Fire & Security were combined into UTC Climate, Controls & Security. Prior to 2001,Industrial Systems. Mr. Darnis heldcurrently serves as the non-executive Chairman of Miliken & Company Inc. and as a numbermember of general managementits Human Resources and financial positions at UTC in Latin America, EuropeCompensation, Finance, and Asia.Nominating & Governance Committees. Mr. Darnis also served as a member on the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute from 2003 to 2006, including Chairman from November 2004 to November 2005, and then as an advisory member of the Executive Committee from 2007 to 2014.

Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT
REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Mr. Darnis for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant management experience as president of a major operating unit at a large global manufacturing company and his wide-ranging expertise in a variety of industries in which the Company operates, including industrial and aerospace.

Age:BOARD COMMITTEES:

 57■  


Director Since: October 2015

Board Committees:
Audit Committee

■  Compensation and Human Capital Committee

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT    27





11



DONALD DEFOSSET, JR.

 

Age: 72

Director since:

October 2011

FormerChairman,President &CEO of WalterIndustries, Inc.

defosset.jpg

CAREER:

Donald DeFosset, Jr.


Former Chairman,
President & CEO of
Walter Industries, Inc.


Career

Donald DeFosset, Jr.retired in 2005 as Chairman, President and& Chief Executive Officer of Walter Industries, Inc., a diversifiedpublic company with principal operating businesses in homebuilding and home financing, water transmission products and energy services. Mr. DeFosset had served since November 2000 as President and& Chief Executive Officer, and since March 2002 as Chairman, of Walter Industries. Over his career, Mr. DeFosset held significant leadership positions in major multinational corporations, including Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., a global supplier of engineered systems, Navistar International Corporation and AlliedSignal, Inc. Mr. DeFosset is currently a director of the following public companies: National Retail Properties Inc. since 2008 (Chairman(Non-Executive Chairman of Governance and Nominating Committee; Compensation Committee)the Board); Regions Financial Corporation since 2005 (Chairman of the Compensation Committee; RiskNominating & Governance Committee); and Terex Corporation since 1999 (Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee; Audit Committee). Mr. DeFosset is also a director of various private companies and not-for-profit organizations.

Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Mr. DeFosset for director of the Company, the Board considered his extensive experience as a chief executive of a large diversified industrial company and as a senior executive of an international machinery manufacturer. His service on the boards of directors of a variety of large public companies further enhances his experience and adds value to the Company'sCompany’s Board.

Age:BOARD COMMITTEES:

■   68Nominating and Governance Committee (Chair)

■  Audit Committee


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

Director Since:  October 2011


Other Public Company Boards:
National Retail Properties, Inc.

■  Regions Financial Corporation

■  Terex Corporation


Board Committees:
• Compensation & Personnel Committee
• Nominating & Governance Committee

NICHOLAS C. FANANDAKIS
nicholasfanandakis.jpg
Nicholas C. Fanandakis

Age: 64

Director since:

October 2016

FormerExecutive VicePresident

and Chief Financial
Officer of E.I. du Pont
de Nemours and
Company
DowDuPont



Career

CAREER:

Nicholas C. Fanandakis is currently servesretired. He served as theExecutive Vice President of DowDuPont until June 2019. FromNovember 2009 to December 2019, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.DuPont. He was appointed to his current position in November 2009 after havingpreviously served as Group Vice President of DuPont Applied BioSciences in 2008 and the Vice President of Corporate Plans in 2007. Prior to 2007, Mr. Fanandakis served in several positions within the DuPont organization ranging from a variety of plant, marketing and product management positions within Petrochemicals, Chemicals & Pigments, and Specialty Chemicals, as well as in the Industrial Solutions market space. Mr. Fanandakis joined DuPont in 1979 as an accounting and business analyst in the Petrochemicals Department. Mr. Fanandakis is currently a director of the following public company:companies: FTI Consulting, Inc. since January 2014 (Chairman of the Audit Committee) and Duke Energy Corporation (Finance and Risk Management Committee and Audit Committee).


Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Mr. Fanandakis for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant financial and business experience resulting from holding various management positions at a large public manufacturing company, his overall financial management abilities, including multinational legal, tax and banking expertise, and his experience and knowledge of global industrial markets.

BOARD COMMITTEES:

Age:■  Audit Committee

 60■  Compensation and Human Capital Committee


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

Director Since:■   October 2016


Other Public Company Boards:
FTI Consulting, Inc.

Board Committees:
• Audit Committee

■  Duke Energy Corporation




12



ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT    28

christinaagold.jpg
Christina A. Gold

Former President & CEO
of The Western Union Company


Career

Christina A. Gold was President and Chief Executive Officer of The Western Union Company, a leading company in global money transfer, from September 2006 to September 2010. She was President of Western Union Financial Services, Inc. and Senior Executive Vice President of First Data Corporation, former parent company of The Western Union Company, from May 2002 to September 2006. Prior to that, Ms. Gold served as Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Excel Communications, Inc., from October 1999 to May 2002. From 1998 to 1999, Ms. Gold served as President and CEO of Beaconsfield Group, Inc., a direct selling advisory firm that she founded. Ms. Gold began her career in 1970 at Avon Products, Inc., where she spent 28 years in a variety of significant leadership positions. She currently serves on the board of Carleton University. Ms. Gold is currently a director of the following public companies: International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. since 2013 (Compensation Committee; Governance Committee) and Korn/Ferry International since 2014 (Compensation and Personnel Committee; Governance Committee). Ms. Gold has also served as a director since 2001 of New York Life Insurance Company and currently serves on the board of the Safe Water Network.

Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT

In considering Ms. Gold for director of the Company, the Board considered her extensive experience as the Chief Executive Officer of a public company with wide ranging global leadership, management and marketing experience. The Board also considered her long history as a director and extensive knowledge of the Company, its operations and its people.
Age: 69

Director Since: December 1997

Other Public Company Boards:
• International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.
• Korn/Ferry International

Former Public Company Boards:
• Exelis Inc. (2011-2013)

Board Committees:
• Compensation & Personnel Committee (Chair)
• Audit Committee

RICHARD P. LAVIN

Age: 69

Director since:

May 2013

Chairman

FormerPresident& CEO ofCommercialVehicle Group,Inc.

richardplavin.jpg

CAREER:

Richard P. Lavin


Former President & CEO
of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.


Career
Richard P. Lavinwas Chief Executive Officer and& President of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., a leader in the development,manufacturing and fulfillment of fully integrated system solutions for the commercial vehicle market from May 2013 to November 2015. Prior to joining Commercial Vehicle Group, Mr. Lavin spent 29 years in a variety of positions with Caterpillar Inc. (“Caterpillar”), including as Vice President of manufacturing operations for the Asia Pacific Division, serving as Chairman of Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd. (SCM) —- now Caterpillar Japan Ltd. (CJL) —- and Chairman of Caterpillar (China) Investment Co., Ltd, and as a group president for Construction Industries and Growth Markets. Mr. Lavin is currently a director of the following public companies: USG Corporation since 2009 (Chairman of the Compensation Committee; Finance Committee) andcompany Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. since 2016 (Compensation Committee; Nominating & Governance Committee).

Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Mr. Lavin for director of the Company, the Board considered his experience overseeing Caterpillar Inc.'sCaterpillar’s largest operating division and extensive international experience through overseeing that company'scompany’s operations in China, India, Japan and the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, Mr. Lavin has a diverse legal and human resources background, having served as director of Corporate Labor and Human Relations and director of Compensation and Benefits, as well as the Vice President of Caterpillar'sCaterpillar’s Human Services Division.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

Age:  65

Director Since: May 2013

Other Public Company Boards:
• USG Corporation
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

■  
Former Public Company Boards:

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (2013-2015)

■  Board Committees:
USG Corporation (2009-2019)
• Compensation & Personnel Committee
• Nominating & Governance Committee



13



MARIO LONGHI
franktmacinnis.jpg
Frank T. MacInnis

Age: 66

Director since:

October 2017

FormerPresident &CEO of EMCOR Group, Inc.

UnitedStates SteelCorporation

CAREER:



Career


Frank T. MacInnis wasMario Longhi served as the President & Chief Executive Officer of EMCORUnited States Steel Corporation, an integrated producerand manufacturer of flat-rolled sheet and tubular steel products for a wide range of industries from September 2013 to May 2017. Previously, Mr. Longhi was President of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation from 2005 to 2006 and President and Chief Executive Officer from 2006 to 2011. He was also the Group President, Global Extrusions, at Alcoa Inc., onewhere he served in a number of increasingly responsible roles over a more than 20-year career with the world's largest providers of electrical and mechanical construction services, energy infrastructure and facilities services, from 1994 to 2011 and Chairman of the Board from 1994 to 2013.company. Throughout his career he has gained experience in the appliance, container, mining, automotive and transportation, aerospace, power generation, industrial machinery and construction industries. Mr. MacInnis has managed construction and operations all over the world, including in Tehran, Baghdad, Bangkok, the United Arab Emirates, London, the United States and Canada. Mr. MacInnisLonghi is alsocurrently a director of various private companiesthe following public companies: Harsco Corporation (Management Development & Compensation Committee; Audit Committee) and not-for-profit organizations.

UGI Corporation.
Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Mr. MacInnisLonghi for director of the Company, the Board considered his more than 25 years of broad-basedsignificant industrial leadership experience as a chief executive officer of a leading, publicly held, international mechanical and electrical construction, energy infrastructure and facilities services provider. The Board also considered his experiences on the boards of various other public companies, his leadership and insights in many of the commercial and defense markets served by the Company,global viewpoint, as well as his background in corporate governance, finance and accounting, legal, strategy and risk management. The Board also considered his long history as a director and extensivedeep knowledge of the Company, its operationssteel industry and its people.commodities, which are important to understanding the Company’s overall business and results.

BOARD COMMITTEES:

■  Audit Committee

■  Compensation and Human Capital Committee

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

■  Harsco Corporation

■  UGI Corporation

FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

■  United States Steel Corporation (2013-2017)

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT    29

Age: 70

Director Since: October 2001
Chairman Since: October 2011

Former Public Company Boards:
• EMCOR Group, Inc. (1994-2015)
• The Williams Companies, Inc. (1998-2016)

Board Committees:
• Nominating & Governance Committee (Chair)

REBECCA A. MCDONALD

Age: 68

Director since:

December 2013

Former CEOof LaurusEnergy Inc.

rebeccaamcdonald.jpg

CAREER:

Rebecca A. McDonald


Former CEO of Laurus Energy Inc.



Career

Rebecca A. McDonaldretired in July 2012, having served since December 2008 as Chief Executive Officer of Laurus EnergyInc., a company involved in underground coal gasification development. She previously served as President, Gas and Power, BHP Billiton from March 2004 to September 2007, and, from October 2001 to January 2004, she served as President of the Houston Museum of Natural Science. Ms. McDonald has more than 25 years of experience in the energy industry. She has been responsible for the development, construction and operation of natural gas and liquids pipelines, gas and electricity distribution companies, as well as power plant and gas processing facilities in North America, Asia, Africa and South America. Ms. McDonald is currently a director of the following public company: Veresen Inc. since 2008 (Audit Committee; Environment, Health & Safety Committee).

Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Ms. McDonald for director of the Company, the Board considered her significant expertise in the oil and gas industry, as well as her executive-level experience and extensive knowledge of business systems and operations. The Board also considered her experience as a director of a variety of public and private companies within the energy industry.

BOARD COMMITTEES:

■  Compensation and Human Capital Committee

■  Nominating and Governance Committee

FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

Age:  64

Director Since: December 2013

Other Public Company Boards:
• Veresen Inc.

Former Public Company Boards:
Aggreko plc (2001-2015)
(2012-2015)

■  Granite Construction Incorporated
(1994-2015)

■  CRH public limited company (2015-2016)

■  
Board Committees:
• Compensation & Personnel Committee
• Audit Committee
Veresen Inc. (2008-2017)




14



TIMOTHY H. POWERS
timothyhpowers.jpg
Timothy H. Powers

Age: 72

Director since:

February 2015

FormerChairman,

President and &CEO of
HubbellIncorporated


Career

CAREER:

Timothy H. Powers was the Chairman, President and& Chief Executive Officer of Hubbell Incorporated from 2004 to 2013. He wasappointed to the position of Chairman after having served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Hubbell from 2001 to 2004 and as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1998 to 2001. Mr. Powers also served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Business Development Americas Region at ABB, Inc. and as Vice President and Corporate Controller for BBC Brown Boveri, Inc. Mr. Powers is currentlyserved as a director of the following public company:company WestRock Company (formerly MeadWestvaco Corporation) sincefrom 2006 (Audit Committee; Compensation Committee).until January 2021. In addition, Mr. Powers served as a director of the National Electric Manufacturers Association and as a trustee for Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation until 2013.


Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Mr. Powers for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant experience as a Chief Executive Officer and finance officer in global manufacturing and engineering companies. The Board also considered his experience in the areas of management, strategic planning, and mergers and acquisitions in the manufacturing industry.

BOARD COMMITTEES:

■  Audit Committee (Chair)

■  Nominating and Governance Committee

FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

Age:■   68

Director Since: February 2015

Other PublicWestRock Company Boards:
(2006-2021)

■  • WestRock Company

Former Public Company Boards:
Hubbell Incorporated (2004-2014)

Board Committees:
• Audit Committee (Chair)
• Nominating & Governance Committee

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT    30

LUCA SAVI
deniseramos2.jpg
Denise L. Ramos

Age: 55

Director since:

January 2019

CEO and &President

ofITT Inc.

CAREER:



Career

Denise L. RamosLuca Savi was appointed Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of the Company in October 2011. SheJanuary 2019. He previouslyserved as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since August 2018 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2017. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President and President, Motion Technologies since February 2016 and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the CompanyPresident, Motion Technologies since 2007.November 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. RamosMr. Savi served as Chief FinancialOperating Officer, for Furniture Brands International from 2005 to 2007. From 2000 to 2005, Ms. Ramos served as Senior Vice President and Corporate TreasurerComau Body Welding at Yum! Brands, Inc. and Chief Financial Officer for the U.S. division of KFC Corporation. Ms. Ramos began her career in 1979 at Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), where she had more than 20 years of business and financial experience serving inComau, a number of increasingly responsible finance positions, including Corporate General Auditor and Assistant Treasurer. Ms. Ramos is currently a directorsubsidiary of the following public company: Phillips 66, since 2016 (AuditFiat Group responsible for producing and Finance Committee; Nominating & Governance Committee; Public Policy Committee). She serves on the Board of Trustees for the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivityserving advanced manufacturing systems, from 2009 to 2011 and Innovationas Chief Executive Officer, Comau North America from 2007 to 2009. Mr. Savi previously held leadership roles at Honeywell International, and is also a member of the Business RoundtableRoyal Dutch Shell and the Business Council. Ms. Ramos was included in the Top 100 CEO Leaders in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math publication by STEMconnector, she received a Distinguished Leadership Award from the New York Hall of Science and she was named to Fortune magazine's 2014 Top People in Business.

technical roles at Ferruzzi-Montedison Group.
Reasons for Election to the Board of ITT

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Ms. RamosMr. Savi for director of the Company, the Board considered Ms. Ramos' unique background which combines more than two decadesMr. Savi’s significant experience in many of the oil and gas industry with significant retail and customer-centric experience.Company’s most important end markets. The Board also considered herhis extensive operational, strategy and manufacturinggrowth and innovation experience with industrial companies and, in particular, her intimatehis knowledge of the Company'sCompany’s business and operations having served as its Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2011the President of the Company’s largest business unit and as its Chief Operating Officer since January 2017.

CHERYL L. SHAVERS

Age: 67

Director since:

October 2018

Chairman &CEO of GlobalSmarts, Inc.

CAREER:

Dr. Cheryl L. Shavers has served as the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Global Smarts, Inc., an advisory services andstrategy firm that specializes in integration of capital, technology and information across national borders, since 2011.February 2001. From 1999 to 2001, Dr. Shavers served as the Undersecretary of Commerce for Technology at the U.S. Department of Commerce, where she oversaw the Office of Technology Policy and the Technology Administration, the focal point for partnerships between the U.S. government and the private sector pertaining to commercial and industrial innovation, productivity and economic growth. She also served as Undersecretary Designate from April 1999 to November 1999. Dr. Shavers has also served as a director of the Knowles Corporation since 2007.

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Dr. Shavers for director of the Company, the Board considered her extensive experience as a highly regarded and sought after technical and business expert and her extensive experience with technology development, innovation and management of growth opportunities.

BOARD COMMITTEES:

■  Nominating and Governance Committee

■  Compensation and Human Capital Committee

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

■  Knowles Corporation

FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

■  Rockwell Collins Corporation (2001-2018)

■  Mentor Graphics Inc. (2016-2017)

■  Advanced Materials Technology Inc. (2008-2014)

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT    31

Age: 60

Director Since: October 2011

Other Public Company Boards:
• Phillips 66

Former Public Company Boards:
• Praxair Inc. (2014-2016)


SABRINA SOUSSAN

Age: 51

Director since:

October 2018

CEO ofdormakabaHolding AG

CAREER:

Sabrina Soussan assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer of dormakaba Holding AG effective April 1, 2021. Ms. Soussanpreviously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Siemens Mobility from October 2017 to July 2020. Before that she served as the Chief Executive Officer of Siemens AG’s High-Speed, Commuter Trains, Locomotive, Metro and Light Rail business unit from October 2015 to September 2017. Ms. Soussan has held several other leadership positions in various other divisions of Siemens, including the Vice President of Sustainability and Energy Management of the Siemens Switzerland Ltd. Building Technologies Division, the head of strategy, marketing and global account management for the Building Automation unit and the Head of Powertrain business for Renault Nissan (in Europe and Japan) for Siemens Automotive division. Ms. Soussan held various other positions at Siemens since she joined in 1997. Prior to Siemens, she was an Engine Research & Development Engineer for Renault. Ms. Soussan also has served as a director of Schaeffler AG since 2019.

REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:

In considering Ms. Soussan for director of the Company, the Board considered her extensive business and technical experience in the automotive, building technology, rail systems and aeronautics markets, as well as her leadership experience in a multinational organization.

BOARD COMMITTEES:

■  Audit Committee

■  Nominating and Governance Committee

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:

■  Schaeffler AG

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE 11 NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE AS DIRECTORS. UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE 11 NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE AS DIRECTORS.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT    32


15



Back to Contents
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election of the 10 nominees listed above as directors. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the election of the 10 nominees listed above as directors.

Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proxy Item No.RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

(PROXY ITEM NO. 2)

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm. To execute this responsibility, the Audit Committee engages in a comprehensive annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm'sfirm’s qualifications, performance and independence and considers whether the independent registered public accounting firm should be rotated and considers the potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has selected, and the Board of Directors has ratified the selection of, Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte"(“Deloitte”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2021. Deloitte has served as the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2002. In accordance with SEC rules and Deloitte policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements whichthat limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide service to our Company. For lead and concurring audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years. The process for selection of the Company'sCompany’s lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the Chair of the Audit Committee and the candidate for the role, as well as discussion by the full committee and with management.

The Audit Committee and Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders, and we are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2021. Although ratification is not required by our By-laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte to our shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders'shareholders’ views on the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that our shareholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered a recommendation to the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. In addition, even if shareholders ratify the selection of Deloitte, the Audit Committee may in its discretion select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Deloitte is a registered public accounting firm regulated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the "PCAOB"“PCAOB”). Representatives of Deloitte attended all regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee during 2016.2020. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm all communications required by auditing standards of the PCAOB. In addition, the committee discussed with the registered public accounting firm its independence from the Company and its management.management, the scope of Deloitte’s audit, the Company’s critical accounting estimates, significant accounting policies and the critical audit matters addressed during the audit. The Audit Committee annually reviews and considers Deloitte'sDeloitte’s performance of the Company's audit. Performance factors reviewed include Deloitte's:

Company’s audit, including the following performance factors:

■  independence
■ experience
■  independencetechnical capabilities
■  client service assessment
  responsiveness
■  financial strength
■  industry insight
■  leadership
experience■  non-audit services
technical capabilities■  management structure
client service assessment■  peer review program
responsiveness■  commitment to quality report
financial strength■  appropriateness of fees charged
industry insight■  compliance and ethics program

The Audit Committee also reviewed the terms and conditions of Deloitte'sDeloitte’s engagement letter including an agreement between the Company and Deloitte to submit disputes between Deloitte and the Company to a dispute resolution process.

The Audit Committee discussed the engagement letter, as well as Deloitte'sDeloitte’s fees and services with Deloitte and Company management. The Audit Committee also determined that any non-audit services (services other than those described in the annual audit services engagement letter) provided by Deloitte were permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC and rules promulgated by the PCAOB. Representatives of Deloitte will be present at the Annual Meeting to answer questions. Representatives of Deloitte also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT     33


16



Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES

Aggregate fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20162020 and 20152019 represent fees billed by Deloitte and its foreign affiliates.

Fiscal Year Ended
(in thousands)
 2016 2015
Audit Fees(1)
 $3,745
 $4,075
Audit-Related Fees(2)
 139
 105
Tax Fees:(3)
    
Tax Compliance Services 333
 116
Tax Planning Services 138
 501
Total Tax Services (sum of Tax Fees) 471
 617
All Other Fees 
 
Total $4,355
 $4,797

Fiscal Year Ended (in thousands) 2020  2019 
Audit Fees(1) $4,068  $4,454 
Audit-Related Fees(2)  91   105 
Tax Fees:(3)        
Tax Compliance Services  94   408 
Tax Planning Services  275   831 
Total Tax Services (sum of Tax Fees)  369   1,238 
All Other Fees     35 
TOTAL $4,528  $5,832 

(1)
(1)Fees for audit services billed in 20162020 and 20152019 consisted of:
audit of the Company's annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting;
reviews of the Company's quarterly financial statements;
statutory and regulatory audits, consents and other services related to SEC matters; and
financial accounting and reporting consultations.
audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting;
(2)reviews of the Company’s quarterly financial statements;
statutory and regulatory audits, consents and other services related to SEC matters; and
financial accounting and reporting consultations.
(2)Fees for audit-related services billed in 20162020 and 20152019 consisted of miscellaneous attest services.
(3)Fees for tax services billed in 20162020 and 20152019 consisted of tax compliance and tax planning and advice:
Tax compliance services are services rendered, based upon facts already in existence or transactions that have already occurred, to document, compute and obtain government approval for amounts to be included in tax filings consisting primarily of:
tax compliance services are services rendered, based upon facts already in existence or transactions that have already occurred, to document, compute and obtain government approval for amounts to be included in tax filings consisting primarily of:
-federal, foreign, state and local income tax return assistance;
-Internal Revenue Code and foreign tax code technical consultations; and
-transfer pricing analyses.
transfer pricing analyses.tax planning services are services and advice rendered with respect to proposed transactions or services to analyze an anticipated tax result. Such services consisted primarily of tax advice related to intra-group restructuring.
Tax planning services are services and advice rendered with respect to proposed transactions or services that alter the structure of a transaction to obtain an anticipated tax result. Such services consisted primarily of tax advice related to intra-group restructuring.

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services.

PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

The Audit Committee pre-approves audit services provided by Deloitte. The Audit Committee has a policy on pre-approval of permitted non-audit services provided by Deloitte. The purpose of the policy is to identify thresholds for services, project amounts and circumstances where Deloitte may perform permitted non-audit services. A second level of review and approval by the Audit Committee is required when such permitted non-audit services, project amounts or circumstances exceed the specified amounts.

The Audit Committee has determined that, where practical, all permitted non-audit services shall first be placed for competitive bid prior to selection of a service provider. Management may select the party deemed best suited for the particular engagement, which may or may not be Deloitte. The policy is reviewed and reaffirmed on a regular basis to assure conformance with applicable rules.

The Audit Committee has approved specific categories of audit, audit-related and tax services incremental to the normal auditing services, which Deloitte may provide without further Audit

Committee pre-approval. These categories include, among others, the following:

1.Due diligence, closing balance sheet audit services, purchase price dispute support and other services related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures;
2.Employee benefit advisory services, independent audits and preparation of tax returns for the Company'sCompany’s defined contribution, defined benefit and health and welfare benefit plans, preparation of the associated tax returns or other employee benefit advisory services;
3.Tax compliance and certain tax planning and advice work; and
4.Accounting consultations and support related to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").GAAP.


17



The Audit Committee has also approved specific categories of audit-related services, including the assessment and review of internal controls and the effectiveness of those controls, which outside internal audit service providers may provide without further approval.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT     34

If fees for any pre-approved non-audit services provided by either Deloitte or any outside internal audit service provider exceed a pre-determined threshold during any calendar year, any additional proposed non-audit services provided by that service provider must be submitted for second-level approval by the Audit Committee. Other audit, audit-related and tax services whichthat have not been pre-approved are subject to specific prior approval. The Audit Committee reviews the fees paid or committed to Deloitte during regularly scheduled meetings and at other times as necessary.

The Company has policies and procedures in place prohibiting, in some cases, employment of former Deloitte employees who were members of the audit engagement team.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR the ratification of Deloitte to serve as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the 2017 fiscal year. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be votedTHE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE TO SERVE AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR the ratification of Deloitte.THE 2020 FISCAL YEAR. UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE.

Audit Committee Report
Role of the Audit CommitteeAUDIT COMMITTEE .    REPORT

ROLE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors provides oversight on matters relating to the Company'sCompany’s financial reporting process and ensures that the Company develops and maintains adequate financial controls and procedures, and monitors compliance with these processes. This includes responsibility for, among other things:

determination of qualifications and independence of Deloitte, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm;
appointment, compensation and oversight of Deloitte in preparing or issuing audit reports and related work;
review of financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, and the annual independent audit of the Company's financial statements;
oversight and review of procedures developed for consideration of accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing-related complaints;
review of the Company's policies with respect to risk assessment, risk management and the Company's major financial risk exposures;
monitoring all elements of the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and
adoption of and monitoring the implementation and compliance with the Company's Non-Audit Services Policy.

determination of qualifications and independence of Deloitte, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;
appointment, compensation and oversight of Deloitte in preparing or issuing audit reports and related work;
review of financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, and the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements;
oversight and review of procedures developed for consideration of accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing-related complaints;
review of the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment, risk management and the Company’s major financial risk exposures;
monitoring all elements of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
adoption of and monitoring the implementation and compliance with the Company’s Non-Audit Services Policy.

The Audit Committee also has oversight responsibility for confirming the scope and monitoring the progress and results of internal audits conducted by the Company'sCompany’s internal auditor. The Audit Committee discussed with the Company'sCompany’s internal auditors and Deloitte the plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the internal auditors and Deloitte, with and without management present, and discussed the results of their examinations, their evaluation of the Company'sCompany’s internal controls, and the Company'sCompany’s financial reporting.

The Company'sCompany’s management has primary responsibility for the financial statements, including the Company'sCompany’s system of disclosure and internal controls. The Audit Committee may investigate any matter brought to its attention. In that regard, the Audit Committee has full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company, and the Audit Committee may retain outside counsel, auditors or other independent experts to assist the Committee in performing its responsibilities. Any individual may also bring matters to the Audit Committee by following the procedures set forth in this Proxy Statement under the heading "Communication“Communication with the Board of DirectorsDirectors.”

."

Audit Committee Charter.AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee review, and at least annually update and reaffirm. The charter sets out the purpose, membership and organization, and key responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT     35

Regular Review of Financial Statements.
Back to Contents

REGULAR REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During 2016,2020, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company'sCompany’s audited financial statements with management. The Audit Committee, management and Deloitte reviewed and discussed the Company'sCompany’s unaudited financial statements before the release of each quarter'squarter’s earnings report and filing on Form 10-Q, and the Company'sCompany’s audited financial statements before the annual earnings release and filing on Form 10-K.



18



Communications with Deloitte.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH DELOITTE

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte the matters required to be discussed under the standards of the PCAOB. These discussions included Deloitte'sDeloitte’s responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards in the United States, the scope of Deloitte’s audit, significant accounting policies and management judgments, the quality of the Company'sCompany’s accounting principles and accounting estimates.estimates, new accounting guidance and any critical matters addressed during the audit. The Audit Committee met privately with Deloitte eight times during 2016.

Independence of Deloitte.2020.

INDEPENDENCE OF DELOITTE

Deloitte is directly accountable to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte'sDeloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte their independence from management and the Company, any disclosed relationships and the impact of those relationships on Deloitte'sDeloitte’s independence.

Recommendation Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

In performing its oversight function with regard to the 20162020 financial statements, the Audit Committee relied on financial statements and information prepared by the Company'sCompany’s management. It also relied on information provided by the internal audit staff as well as Deloitte. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Company'sCompany’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020. Based on these discussions, and the information received and reviewed, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors that the Company'sCompany’s financial statements be included in the Company's 2016Company’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This report is furnished by the members of the Audit Committee.

• G. Peter D'Aloia   Geraud Darnis  Donald DeFosset, Jr.  Nicholas C. Fanandakis
• Christina A. Gold  Mario Longhi• Rebecca A. McDonald  Timothy H. Powers (Chair)  Sabrina Soussan

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT     36

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (Proxy Item No.PROXY ITEM NO. 3)

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution subject to shareholder vote to approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers as defined by the SEC in Item 402 of Regulation S-K (the "Named Executive Officers" or "NEOs") as disclosed later in this Proxy Statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The following resolution will be submitted for a shareholder vote at the Annual Meeting:

"

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of ITT Inc. (the "Company"“Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company'sCompany’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement for the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Item 402 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and narrative disclosures."

In considering their vote, shareholders may wish to review with care the information on the Company'sCompany’s compensation policies and decisions regarding the NEOs presented in this Proxy Statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

In particular, shareholders should note that the Company'sCompany’s Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee bases its executive compensation decisions on the following:

alignment of executive and shareholder interests by providing incentives linked to earnings per share, adjusted cash flow, operating margin and revenue performance;
the ability for executives to achieve long-term shareholder value creation without undue business risk;
creating a clear link between an executive's individual contribution and performance and his or her compensation;
the extremely competitive nature of the industries in which we operate and our need to attract and retain the most creative and talented industry leaders; and
comparability to the practices of peers in the industries that we operate in and other comparable companies generally.

alignment of executive and shareholder interests by providing incentives linked to the performance of certain financial metrics;
the ability for executives to achieve long-term shareholder value creation without undue business risk;
creating a clear link between an executive’s individual contribution and performance and his or her compensation;
the extremely competitive nature of the industries in which we operate and our need to attract and retain the most creative and talented industry leaders; and
comparability to the practices of peers in the industries that we operate in and other comparable companies generally.

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our NEOs, as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC'sSEC’s compensation disclosure rules.



19



The Board values the opinions of the Company'sCompany’s shareholders as expressed through their votes and other communications. This vote is advisory in nature and non-binding; however, the Board will review and consider the shareholder vote when determining executive compensation. The current frequency of non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation is an annual vote, and we anticipate that the next vote will be at next year'syear’s annual meeting.

 RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THIS MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT     37

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY38
RecommendationGOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION42
ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION44
2020 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN45
2020 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION48
BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES50
OTHER COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS50
POLICIES51

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND FINANCIAL RESULTS

During 2020, we experienced significant challenges to our end markets due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the significant decline in sales and operating income, we achieved record cash flow through a focus on cost containment and continued operational excellence by ITT employees. The following are highlights from our reported fiscal 2020 performance (all financial comparisons are versus 2019):

RevenueSegment
Operating Margin
EPSOperating Cash
Flow
$2.48B
(13%)
12.9%
(230 bps)
$0.78
(79%)
$436M
22%
Organic RevenueAdjusted
Segment
Operating Margin
Adjusted EPSFree Cash Flow
$2.46B
(14%)
15.2%
(80 bps)
$3.20
(16%)
$372M
40%

See the section titled “Key Performance Indicators and Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the reasons why we use non-GAAP financial measures and for reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ACTIONS RELATED TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

ITT’s Board of Directors and Management took quick and decisive action to address the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic and approved temporary changes to some compensation programs. The objective of these changes was to preserve cash and liquidity during a time of great uncertainty regarding the severity and length of the pandemic’s impact on our business conditions.

The annual salary of the Board of DirectorsCEO was reduced by 20% effective from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 and then reinstated effective January 1, 2021.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the advisory resolution approving the compensationannual salary rates of the Company's Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicitedother named executive officers were reduced by our Board will be voted FOR this management proposal.20% effective from April 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020 and then reinstated effective October 1, 2020.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT     38

Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Shareholder Votes on Executive Compensation (Proxy Item No. 4)
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in this Proxy Statement a separate proposal for shareholders
The annual salary rates of approximately 100 other ITT executives were reduced by 15% effective from May 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020 and then reinstated effective October 1, 2020.
ITT’s automatic and matching contributions to recommend, in a non-binding vote, whether a non-binding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 3 in this Proxy Statement) should occur every one, two or three years.
In considering their vote, shareholders may wish to review with care the information presented in connection with Proposal No. 3, as well as the information on the Company's compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
We believe that a shareholder vote on executive compensation should occur every year. We believe the one-year frequency provides the highest level of accountability and communication by enabling shareholders to express their approval of our executive compensation program when the most recent executive compensation information is presented in our proxy statement. In particular, because the 401(k) accounts of U.S. employees were suspended from May 1 through December 31, 2020, with the exception of employees represented by a union. Employees impacted by this suspension received a discretionary 401(k) contribution from ITT in February 2021 that will approximately replace ITT’s suspended contributions during the 4th quarter of 2020.

OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation of the following NEOs:

NameTitleITT Career
Luca SaviCEO and PresidentJoined ITT in 2011 as President of Motion Technologies and was appointed CEO in January 2019
Emmanuel CapraisSVP and CFOJoined ITT in 2012 as CFO of Motion Technologies and was appointed ITT CFO in October 2020
Mary Beth GustafssonSVP, General Counsel and Corporate SecretaryJoined ITT in 2014 as SVP and General Counsel  
Ryan FlynnSVP and President, Connect & Control Technologies (“CCT”)Joined ITT in 2016 as General Manager of the Motion Technologies business in China. Mr. Flynn was appointed SVP and President Asia-Pacific Region in January 2019 and then appointed SVP and President CCT in October 2020. Mr. Flynn relocated from China to the U.S. in December 2020.
George HannaFormer SVP and President, Industrial Process (“IP”)Joined ITT in 2011 as Vice President of Asia Pacific for IP and appointed SVP and President IP in March 2019. Mr. Hanna stepped down as SVP and President, IP on April 2, 2021 and will serve as an advisor to the Company until his separation from ITT on July 1, 2021.
Thomas M. ScaleraFormer EVP and CFOJoined ITT in 2006 and was appointed ITT CFO in 2011. As previously described on form 8-K filed June 30, 2020, Mr. Scalera stepped down as CFO in October  2020 and served as advisor to the Company until his separation from ITT in January 2021.

Mr. Hanna’s separation is typically limitednot the result of any disagreement between Mr. Hanna and the Company with respect to compensation decisions that relateany matter relating to the most recently completed fiscal year, shareholders may lack sufficient context to evaluate multiple years of compensation decisions ifCompany’s operations, policies or practices. His separation will be treated as a termination not for cause under the vote were to occur less often than annually.

We also believe that providing the vote only every two or three years may prevent shareholders from communicating in a meaningful manner. For example, we may not know whether the shareholder vote approves or disapproves of compensation for the reporting period or the compensation for previous reporting periods or both. As a result, the implicationsterms of the shareholder vote could be difficult to discern.
If we continue to hold anCompany’s executive compensation plans.

OUR SAY ON PAY AND ENGAGEMENT WITH SHAREHOLDERS

Our annual advisory vote on executive compensation (“Say on Pay”) received 97% support last year, and has received an average of 92% support over the last five years.

Our investor engagement effort, as described under “Corporate Governance and Related Matters - Shareholder Engagement,” reached the highest percentage of shares owned by our investors since we will present a resolution subject to a non-bindingadopted the current approach of shareholder vote to approveengagement in 2017. In 2020 we increased the compensationnumber of shareholders and percentage of shares covered by contacting shareholders representing 69% of ITT’s outstanding shares and engaging in conversations with shareholders representing over 47% of our named executive officers inoutstanding shares. During our discussions we heard the proxy materials for our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders. Such resolution will correspond to the resolution set forth in this Proxy Statement and in each of our annual meeting proxy statements since 2011.

following general themes:

investors understood and supported the compensation actions taken in light of the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our end markets;
investors appreciated the implementation of leadership succession planning and our strong internal pipeline through the transition of Board Chair, CEO, CFO and Value Center Presidents over the past two years; and
investors were encouraged by the disclosure of our Sustainability Reports and our continued effort in this area, while also suggesting that we consider additional metrics and goals in the future.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT     39

For the reasons stated above, the Board of Directors is recommending a vote for a one-year frequency for the non-binding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. Note that shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board of Directors with respect to this proposal. Instead, each proxy card provides for four choices with respect to this proposal: a one, two, or three-year frequency or shareholders may abstain from voting on this proposal.
Your vote on this proposal will be non-binding on us and the Board of Directors, and it will not be construed as overruling a decision by us or the Board of Directors. Your vote will not create or imply any change to our fiduciary duties or create or imply any additional fiduciary duties for us or the Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors values the opinions that our shareholders express in their votes and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions on the inclusion of such proposals in the proxy materials.


20



Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
Business Environment and Financial Results. During 2016, we faced a challenging market environment in many of our key end markets. Weakness in the global oil & gas, mining and general industrial markets reduced revenue from our Industrial Process and Interconnect Solutions business segments by 21%. We benefited from a diversified portfolio and partially offset these market challenges through aggressive cost management and growth and share gains in the automotive brake pad market, including incremental benefit from our 2015 acquisition of Wolverine Advanced Materials.
Our 2016 GAAP financial results include the following:
Revenue declined 3% to $2.4B,
Operating margin declined 450 basis points to 10.8%, and
Earnings per share (EPS) was $2.02.
Despite financial headwinds, we delivered 8% total shareholder return in 2016, and we continued to make investments in the future of our business, as reflected by our acquisition of Axtone Railway Components, which was announced in November 2016 and completed in January 2017. We also continue to focus on human capital by driving a healthy, high performing culture and focusing on our people, enabling our leaders to drive the Company's strategy in the years to come.

Our Commitment to Pay for Performance Alignment.

OUR COMMITMENT TO PAY FOR PERFORMANCE ALIGNMENT

We have designed our compensation programs to align the pay of our senior executives with both our short-term and long-term financial results and the performance of our stock.

sayonpaymarch10.jpg
Our annual advisory vote on executive compensation ("Say on Pay") has received an average of 97% support over the last four years. We believe this support affirms our program design and our pay for performance approach.
The majority of pay for our CEO and other NEOs is 'at risk'“at risk” and is impacted by our financial results and stock price.
ceotargetpaymarch4.jpgotherneotargetpaymarch4.jpg




21



price performance.

THE IMPACT OF BUSINESS RESULTS ON OUR 2020 INCENTIVE PLANS

The Impact of Business ResultsCOVID-19 pandemic had a significant negative impact on Our 2016 Incentive Plans. As a resultmany of our below target financialend markets including auto, aerospace and oil and gas. Our 2020 AIP includes metrics and weightings that encourage both growth (20% Adjusted EPS and 20% Organic Revenue) and operational excellence (20% Adjusted Free Cash Flow and 20% Adjusted Operating Margin), in addition to a 20% component that rewards executive officers for individual and team performance. 2020 was the final performance year of our 2018 PSU award, which had a payout determined by our return on average, our incentive plans paid out below target.

Our CEO received an annual incentive plan (AIP) payout that was 80.5%invested capital (“ROIC”), and is intended to encourage efficient and disciplined use of targetcapital, and the average payoutrelative total shareholder return (“TSR”), which is intended to directly align executive pay with shareholder return relative to our other NEOs was 75%peer companies. More information on how ROIC and relative TSR are calculated can be found in “2020 Long-Term Incentive Compensation -- Performance Stock Units.”

Despite the challenging business conditions that resulted from the pandemic, ITT generated record adjusted free cash flow and achieved adjusted operating margin that was close to the target that was approved in February 2020, before the scale of the financial impact of the pandemic was known. These results drove an AIP payout that was less than target, but was an exceptional result considering the downturn in some of our key end markets. Our CEO, Mr. Savi, received an AIP payout that was 86% of target, and the average payout to our other NEOs was 77%.
The payout of the 2018 PSU awards was above target due to our strong relative TSR and ROIC results over the past three years. All of our NEOs received a 2018 PSU award, which paid out at 159% of target.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT40
The 2014-2016 performance unit (long-term incentive) awards had a zero payout.
Back to Contents
ceoaippayoutmarch4.jpga2014psupayouta03.jpg
The Impact of Business Results on

CEO Realized Pay. We believe that the Summary Compensation Table (the "SCT") should be supplemented with realized CEO pay because long-term incentive awards are valued based on accounting rules rather than the actual value of the shares vested or realized by the CEO.

The chart below shows the alignment between the actual pay received by our CEO and the Company's three-year shareholder returns. In 2015, our three-year TSR (representing total shareholder returns for the period 2013-2015) was +55%. In 2016, our three-year TSR (representing total shareholder returns for the period 2014-2016) was -11%. Realized pay decreased from 2015 to 2016 due to the zero payout of the 2014-2016 performance unit awards and the below target payout of the 2016 AIP.
ceorealizablemarch4a01.jpg
Target pay for each calendar year includes: annual salary + AIP award at target payout + the grant date fair value of long-term incentive (LTI) awards granted during the year.
Realized pay for each calendar year includes: annual salary + actual AIP payout + the value of LTI awards as of the vesting date, that vested during the year (which were granted three years ago).

Explanation of the Pay Decisions for Our CEO.PAY DECISIONS

In the first quarter of each year, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee meets to determine CEO pay decisions for base salary, annual incentive planAIP and LTI award grants reflectinginclusive of both prior year performance and appropriate positioning versus the representative peer groupRepresentative Peer Group described on page 25.43. The following table displays the decisions made during 2016 and 2017.



22



Pay Component2016 Pay Decisions2017 Pay DecisionsDecision Driver for First Quarter 2017 Decisions
Base Salary$1,000,000$1,000,000The Committee considered Ms. Ramos' base salary to be competitively positioned and did not change the base salary.




Annual Incentive Plan
$1,162,000
(Earned in 2015 and paid in 1Q2016 and shown in SCT for 2015)
$805,000
(Earned in 2016 and paid in 1Q2017 and shown in SCT for 2016)
Ms. Ramos received an AIP payout that was 80.5% of target. As described below, 90% of the AIP payout for NEOs is tied directly to ITT's financial results. The Committee chose to award Ms. Ramos at 125% for the 10% individual component of the AIP for the following accomplishments:
Strong leadership while key markets such as oil & gas were undergoing a structural reset.
Realignment of the organization to create the Chief Operating Officer role, in order to drive better operational execution and efficiencies.
Continuing to position ITT well for the future through prudent acquisitions, a strong balance sheet and investments in R&D, people and culture.

Ms. Ramos' AIP target for 2017 remained at 100% of base salary.
Long-Term Incentives(1)
$4,500,000$4,500,000The Committee considered Ms. Ramos' LTI award value to be competitively positioned and did not change the target value from the previous year.
Total
Earned Direct Compensation
$6,662,000$6,305,000 
with respect to CEO compensation.

Pay Component 2020 Target Pay 2021 Target Pay Drivers for Pay Decisions
Base Salary $1,000,000 $1,000,000 

In February 2020, the Committee considered the performance of ITT and the performance of Mr. Savi during 2019 and increased Mr. Savi’s 2020 base salary from $900,000 to $1,000,000 to be more competitive.

On March 29, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting economic uncertainty, the Committee approved a reduction of base salaries of our NEOs, including the CEO, by 20% effective on April 1, 2020. As a result, Mr. Savi’s salary was reduced to $800,000 from April 1 until December 31, 2020. Mr. Savi’s base salary of $1,000,000 was reinstated effective January 1, 2021 and no retroactive payments were made. Mr. Savi’s earned salary in 2020 was approximately $832,000.

In February 2021, the Committee determined that Mr. Savi’s base salary was competitive and did not increase his salary for 2021.

Annual Incentive Plan Target $1,100,000 $1,150,000 

In February 2020, the Committee approved an increase to Mr. Savi’s AIP Target from 100% to 110% of base salary for 2020 to increase alignment of pay and performance and to better align with peer company benchmarking. This target represented 110% of base salary before the reduction due to the COVID-19 pandemic referenced above.

Mr. Savi received a bonus payout of $946,000 for 2020 performance, which was 86% of target. As described below, 80% of the AIP payout for NEOs is tied directly to ITT’s financial results. The Committee chose to award Mr. Savi at 30% for the 20% individual component of the AIP for the following accomplishments:

■  provided exceptional leadership throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and successfully prioritized the health of ITT’s employees, business and financials;

■  drove operational excellence that resulted in financial stability and record cash flow during a historic downturn; and

■  ensured a laser focus on customers needs and key commercial strategies to gain share in key markets. In February 2021, the Committee approved an increase to Mr. Savi’s AIP target from 110% to 115% of salary for 2021 to further increase alignment of pay and performance.

Long-Term Incentives (LTI)(1) $3,800,000 $4,200,000 The Committee considered Mr. Savi’s performance and peer company benchmarking and increased the 2021 LTI award to $4,200,000. LTI ties the actual amount that Mr. Savi will receive in pay to ITT’s financial performance and stock price, and encourages retention.
TOTAL TARGET COMPENSATION $5,900,000 $6,350,000  

(1)
(1)The 20162020 LTI award value for Mr. Savi differs from what is displayed in the SCTSummary Compensation Table (“SCT”) and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020 table, for 2016, each of which present the grant date fair value recorded for accounting purposes. The 2017of the LTI awards as calculated under GAAP. Mr. Savi’s 2021 LTI award was granted in February 2017March 2021 and is not included in the SCT and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT41

Governance and Compensation
Executive Compensation Philosophy. GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

We have designed our compensation programs to help us recruit and retain the executive talent required to successfully manage our business, achieve our business objectives, and maximize their long-term contributions to our success. We include compensation elements that are designed to align the interests of executives with our goals of enhancing shareholder value and achieving our long-term strategies. We determine total annual compensation by reviewing the median of the competitive market, then position compensation at, above or below the median based on experience, performance, critical skills and the general talent market for each senior executive.

Best Practices that Support Our Executive Compensation Philosophy.

BEST PRACTICES THAT SUPPORT OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee oversees the design and administration of our executive compensation programs and evaluates these programs against competitive practices, legal and regulatory developments and corporate governance trends.

The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee has incorporated the following best practices into our programs:

WHAT WE DOWHAT WE DON’T DO
What We Do
üEmphasize Long-Term Compensation to Ensure Alignment of Pay With Long-Term Performance
ü
No Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock
Significant Majority of Pay is Performance-Based and Not Guaranteed
üStock Ownership Requirements Require Meaningful Holdings
üDouble-Trigger Change in Control Vesting of Equity Awards
üClawback Policy That Applies to Our Annual Incentive Plan and Equity Awards
üLimited Perquisites and Personal Benefits
What We Don't Do
ûNo Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock
û
No Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards or Severance Benefits Solely Upon a Change in Control
û
Stock Ownership Requirements Require Meaningful HoldingsNo Tax Gross-Ups (unless related to international assignment or relocation)
û
Double-Trigger Change in Control Vesting of Equity AwardsNo Golden Parachutes
û
Clawback Policy That Applies to Our Annual Incentive Plan and Equity AwardsNo Repricing of Stock Options
û
Proactive Engagement with ShareholdersNo Supplemental Defined Benefit Pension for Executives
Engage an Independent Compensation ConsultantNo Excessive Perquisites or Personal Benefits


23



Key Participants in the Compensation Process.
Role of the Compensation and Personnel Committee

KEY PARTICIPANTS IN THE COMPENSATION PROCESS

ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE

The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee reviews and approves the compensation elements and the compensation targets for each of our executive officers, including the NEOs. The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee also makes determinations with respect to the AIP as it relates to our executive officers, including the approval of annual performance goals and subsequent full-year achievement against those goals. It administers all elements of the Company'sCompany’s long-term incentive plan, and approves the benefits and perquisites offered to executive officers. Further, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee evaluates the Company'sCompany’s compensation programs on an annual basis to ensure that our plans do not induce or encourage excessive risk-taking by participants. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee may delegate authority to act upon specific matters to a subcommittee.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT42
Role of Management
Back to Contents

ROLE OF MANAGEMENT

During 2016,2020, our CEO and Chief Human Resources Officer made recommendations to the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee regarding executive compensation actions and incentive awards. The Chief Human Resources Officer serves as the liaison between the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee and Pay Governance, providing internal data on an as-needed basis so that Pay Governance can produce comparative analyses for the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee. In 2016,2020, the Company'sCompany’s human resources, finance and legal departments supported the work of the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee by providing information, answering questions and responding to various requests of committee members.

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

ROLE OF THE INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

In 2016,2020, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee continued to use the services of Pay Governance in fulfilling its obligations under its charter, the material terms of which are described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading "Corporate“Corporate Governance and Related Matters—Compensation and Personnel Committee."

Human Capital Committee.”

Pay Governance attended the four regularly-scheduledregularly scheduled meetings of the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee in 20162020 and provided the committeeCommittee with objective expert analyses, assessments, research, and recommendations for executive compensation programs, incentives, perquisites and compensation standards. In this capacity, they provided services that related solely to work performed for, and at the direction of, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee, including analysis of material prepared by management for the Compensation and Personnel Committee'sCommittee’s review. Pay Governance provided no other servicesalso provides advice related to compensation for directors to the Company during 2016. The total amount of fees paid to PayNominating and Governance for 2016 services was $146,800. In addition, the Company reimburses Pay Governance for reasonable travel and business expenses.

Committee.”

The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee selected Pay Governance to serve as its Independent Compensationindependent compensation consultant only after assessing the firm'sfirm’s independence. As part of its independence review, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee reviewed the Company'sCompany’s relationship with Pay Governance and determined that no conflicts of interest existed. The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate consultants, including Pay Governance, with respect to compensation matters.

External Benchmarking.

EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING

In 2016,2020, as in past years, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee looked toconsidered competitive market compensation data, for companies comparablein addition to ITT to establish overallother factors, in determining policies and programs that address executive compensation, benefits and perquisites in line with its stated pay philosophy.

perquisites.

For 20162020 pay decisions for the CEO and CFO, the Company usedCommittee reviewed a peer group of 16 companies comparable to ITT in terms of revenue, market capitalization and industry in order to better evaluate executive compensation market practices (the "Representative“Representative Peer Group"Group”). The CEOWhen making pay decisions the Committee also considers other factors such as individual experience and CFO roles are more easily compared from company to company because their pay is disclosed inperformance, the need for critical skills and the general talent market for each company's proxy statement.senior executive. The 2016 Representative Peer Group consisted of the following companies:



24



Representative Peer Group
Actuant Corporation (ATU)Flowserve Corporation (FLS)
AMETEK, Inc. (AME)Harsco Corporation (HSC)
Barnes Group, Inc. (B)Hubbell Incorporated (HUB)
Carlisle Companies Inc. (CSL)IDEX Corporation (IEX)
Colfax Corporation (CFX)Nordson Corporation (NDSN)
Crane Co. (CR)Roper Industries, Inc. (ROP)
EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO)SPX Flow Inc. (FLOW)
Esterline Technologies Corp (ESL)Woodward, Inc. (WWD)

The Compensation and Personnel Committee annually reviews and evaluates this Representative Peer Group to ensure that it remains appropriate. For 2016, SPX Flow, Inc. replaced SPX in

2020 Representative Peer Group
■  Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC)■  Curtiss-Wright (CW)■  Nordson Corporation (NDSN)
■  AMETEK, Inc. (AME)■  EnPro Industries (NPO)■  Sensata (ST)
■  Barnes Group, Inc. (B)■  Flowserve Corporation (FLS)■  SPX Flow Inc. (FLOW)
■  Carlisle Companies Inc. (CSL)■  Harsco Corporation (HSC)■  Woodward, Inc. (WWD)
■  Colfax Corporation (CFX)■  Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB)
■  Crane Co. (CR)■  IDEX Corporation (IEX)

During 2020, the Committee approved a change to the 2021 Representative Peer Group following SPX Flow's spin-off from SPX Corporationthat included replacing Enerpac Tool Group with Ingersoll Rand. Enerpac Tool Group conducted a divestiture in late 2015.

2019, which reduced annual revenue to below $1B. Ingersoll Rand is a more appropriate peer company for ITT considering revenue and market capitalization. The 2021 Representative Peer Group will be used for compensation decisions that are made in 2021.

The Compensation and Personnel Committee'sHuman Capital Committee’s review of external market data also included as the primary reference for the other NEOs (and as a secondary reference for the CEO and CFO), analysis of thecompensation benchmark data from Willis Towers Watson Compensation Data Bank (the "CDB") and other compensation survey information provided by Pay Governance. This data provides a broader view of executive compensation benchmarking for jobs that are not reported in the Proxy Statement. In particular, the Compensation and Personnel Committee'sCommittee’s analysis used a benchmark group from a Willis Towers Watson survey consisting of 7088 companies from the Industrials, Materials and Energy sectors that were available in the CDB with annual revenue between approximately $1.25 billion and $5 billion in order to provide a representative sample of the Company's broader market for executive talent (see Appendix A).

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT43

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

NEO COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AT A attached).

Elements of Compensation
NEO Compensation Elements at a Glance. The disclosure of our NEO compensation for 2016 covers the following executive officers, including leaders of certain of our business segments ("Segments"):
Denise L. Ramos, Chief Executive Officer and President;
Thomas M. Scalera, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Luca Savi, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;
Mary Beth Gustafsson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer
Aris C. Chicles, Former Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process

On January 5, 2017, we announced that Luca Savi had been named Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, effective immediately. Mr. Savi had served as Executive Vice President and President, Motion Technologies since November 2011. In addition, we announced that Aris C. Chicles, Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process, will be departing the Company on March 30, 2017. Mr. Chicles' separation will be treated as a termination not for cause under the terms of the Company's executive compensation plans.
GLANCE

The compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, is reviewed in detail by the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee during the first quarter of every year. NEO direct compensation for 20162020 consisted of a base salary, an AIP award and long-term incentive awards,LTI award, each of which is detailed below.

2020 Compensation
Element
2016 Compensation
Element
Form
FormMetrics & WeightingsRationale for Providing
Base SalaryCashNot ApplicableBase salary is a competitive fixed pay element tied to role, experience, performance, and criticality of skills.
Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) AwardCash

  Adjusted EPS (20%)

  Adjusted Operating Margin (20%)

  Adjusted Free Cash Flow (20%)

  Organic Revenue (20%)

  Individual and Team Goals (20%)

The AIP is designed to reward achievement of the Company, Segmentsbusiness unit (where applicable) and individual performance.performance objectives. The AIP is structured to emphasize overall performance and collaboration among the Segments.business units. It uses metrics (adjusted earnings per share, adjusted cash flow, adjusted operating margin and adjusted revenue) that are the fundamental short-term drivers of shareholder value. Each NEO also has 10%20% of his or her AIP tied to the achievement of individual and team goals.


25



2016 Compensation
Element
FormRationale for Providing AIP may pay out from 0% to 200% of target.
Long-Term Incentive (LTI) AwardsStock

PSU Awards:

  Relative TSR (50%)

  ROIC (50%)

The LTI plan is designed to reward performance that drives long-term shareholder value through the use of three-year cliff vesting:

• Performance Units (50%

  PSUs (60% of LTI mix) provide rewards linked to absolute stock price performance (due to denomination as ITT share units) and can go up or down based on two key measures, equally weighted, and aligned with long-term growth:

○ Relative Total Shareholder Return
○ Relative Return on Invested Capital
growth. PSUs may pay out from 0% to 200% of target.

  RSUs (25%(40% of LTI mix) link executive compensation to absolute stock price performance and strengthen retention value.

• Stock options (25% of LTI mix) only provide value if there is stock price appreciation.

The actual awardgrant date of stock options,PSUs and RSUs and performance units is determined on the date on which the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee approves these awards, which is typically in February or March.

The Company also provides benefits and limited perquisites to its NEOs that it believes are competitive with the external market for talent. For a more detailed discussion of these benefits and perquisites, see the discussion under the heading "Benefits“Benefits and Perquisites."

2016 Base Salary Increases. Perquisites.”

2020 BASE SALARY INCREASES

The Compensation and Personnel Committee approved the elimination of the automobile allowance for NEOs and certain other executives based in the U.S., effective January 1, 2016. This decision was based on our approach of aligning our compensation practices with prevalent market practices and reducing perquisites where appropriate. With the exception of the CEO, the annual value of the automobile allowance was converted into the salary and annual bonus target for each individual, such that the annual total target cash compensation of each individual remained constant. The Compensation and Personnel Committee did not adjust the salary or bonus target of the CEO in conjunction with eliminating the automobile allowance. In addition, because Mr. Savi is employed by ITT Italy Holding s.r.l. and is not eligible for a U.S. auto allowance, he did not receive this salary adjustment.

The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee reviewed the compensation level of each NEO based oncompared to the Representative Peer Group andand/or the external survey data. Based on the Committee'sCommittee’s targeted pay positioning theand evaluation of each NEO'sNEO’s performance, and the external market data on competitive pay levels provided by Pay Governance, the Committee awarded base salary merit increases for Mr. Scalera, Mr. Savi, and Ms. Gustafsson that were effective February 2016. Mr. Chicles received a base salary merit increase that was effective June 2016. The CEO did not receive a salary increase during 2016 becausein March 2020 to each NEO, including the Committee considered her salary to be competitively positioned.CEO.

  2019 Annual
Base Salary
 2020 Annual
Base Salary(1)
 Percent
Increase
Luca Savi $900,000  $1,000,000   11.1%
Emmanuel Caprais(2)  355,000   450,000   26.8%
Mary Beth Gustafsson  482,000   500,000   3.7%
Ryan F. Flynn(3)  391,304   425,000   8.7%
George Hanna  370,000   400,000   8.1%
Thomas M. Scalera  540,000   560,000   3.7%

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT44
Named Executive Officer2015 Cash Compensation 2016 Cash Compensation
Year-to-Year Change(2)
Salary Rate on Dec. 31, 2015Annual Auto AllowanceAnnual Auto AllowanceSalary Rate on Jan. 1, 2016Salary Rate After 2016 Increase
Denise L. Ramos$1,000,000
$15,600
 Eliminated$1,000,000
$1,000,000
(1.5)%
Thomas M. Scalera475,000
15,600
 Eliminated483,920
500,000
1.9%
Luca Savi(1)
461,760
N/A
 N/A461,760
471,750
2.2%
Mary Beth Gustafsson428,500
15,600
 Eliminated437,420
446,500
0.5%
Aris C. Chicles438,500
15,600
 Eliminated447,420
455,000
0.2%


26


(1)The annual salary of all executive officers, including the CEO, were reduced by 20% effective on April 1, 2020. The normal salary of each executive officer was reinstated effective October 1, 2020, except for the CEO salary which was reinstated effective January 1, 2021. The 2020 Annual Base Salary column reflects the normal salary rate, after the 20% reduction was lifted.
(1)(2)Mr. Savi is employed by ITT Italy Holding s.r.l.Caprais received a salary increase from $355,000 to $370,000 in March 2020 during his role as Vice President, Finance. He received additional responsibilities in May 2020 and is paidreceived a salary increase from $370,000 to $400,000 at that time. He then received a salary increase from $400,000 to $450,000 in Euros. His 2015 annual base salary of €416,000 and his 2016 annual base salary of €425,000 were convertedOctober 2020 when he was promoted to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate of 1.11 dollars per euro for both years. As previously reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 5, 2017, Mr. Savi's annual salary was increased to €477,500 in connection with his appointment to the position of ExecutiveSenior Vice President and Chief OperatingFinancial Officer.
(2)(3)Reflects the difference between the sumMr. Flynn’s salary was converted from Chinese Renminbi to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of the base0.15. Mr Flynn received a salary rateincrease from ¥2,700,000 ($391,304) to ¥2,800,000 ($405,800) as Senior Vice President and annual auto allowancePresident, APAC, Mr. Flynn then received a salary increase from ¥2,800,000 to ¥2,935,000 ($425,000) in 2015,October 2020 when he was named Senior Vice President and the salary rate after the 2016 increase. Mr. Savi is not eligible for the U.S annual auto allowance.President, CCT.

2016 Annual Incentive Plan
2020 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

For 2016,2020, AIP payouts averaged 76%78% of target for all of the NEOs, reflecting below target achievement,the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on average, of annualour end markets and our financial goals.results. The Company'sCompany’s AIP provides for an annual cash payment to participating executives established as a target percentage of base salary. In setting AIP awards, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee approves target AIP awards after careful consideration of external data, individual roles and responsibilities, and individual performance.

The Company pays for AIP performance that demonstrates substantial achievement of plan goals. We established strong incentives and set aggressive goals for all financial metrics. The Company must achieve a certain threshold for each of the four financial performance metrics discussed below in order for each performance component to be considered in the calculation of the AIP payout. Performance below the threshold performance level results in a zero payout for that particular performance component.

The formula to determine each NEO'sNEO’s AIP total potential payment is as follows:

20162020 AIP Potential Payout =
(Base Salary) Salary Rate) x (Target(Target Award Percentage) x (AIP(AIP Performance Factor)
Both the individual performance component of the AIP and the overall

AIP award payoutpayouts are capped at 200% of an individual'sindividual’s annual cash bonus target.

2016

2020 AIP Awards Paid in 2017. AWARDS PAID IN 2021

The 20162020 AIP awards paid in March 20172021 are as follows:

Named Executive Officer2016 Target AIP Awards as Percentage of Base Salary2016 Target AIP Awards2016 AIP Awards (Paid in First Quarter 2017)2016 AIP Awards as Percentage of Target (Paid in First Quarter 2017)
Denise L. Ramos100% $1,000,000
 $805,000
80.5%
Thomas M. Scalera75% 375,000
 300,000
80%
Luca Savi(1)
75% 353,813
 491,800
139%
Mary Beth Gustafsson75% 334,875
 274,598
82%
Aris C. Chicles75% 341,250
 0
0%

Named Executive Officer 2020 Target
AIP Awards as
Percentage of
Base Salary
 2020 AIP Target
Amounts
 2020 AIP
Awards (Paid in
2021)
 2020 AIP
Awards as
Percentage of
Target (Paid in
2021)
Luca Savi  110% $1,100,000  $946,000   86%
Emmanuel Caprais(1)  70%  260,000   231,530   89%
Mary Beth Gustafsson  75%  375,000   285,000   76%
Ryan F. Flynn(2)  75%  293,000   161,105   55%
George Hanna  75%  300,000   264,000   88%
Thomas M. Scalera(3)  75%  420,000   319,200   76%

(1)
(1)In 2016 the Committee approved a target bonus increase from 65% to 75% of annual salary for Mr. Savi. He is employed by ITT Italy Holding s.r.l. and his 2016 Target AIP Award and 2016The 2020 AIP Award paid have been converted from Euro (€) to U.S. dollars usingMr. Caprais was prorated based on the 2016 average exchange rate of 1.11. As previously reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 5, 2017, Mr. Savi's annual AIPsalary and bonus target for 2017 was increased to 85%the 3 months (October - December) in the role of SVP and CFO and the salary and bonus target for the 9 months (January - September) of his baseprevious role as VP, Financial Analysis & Planning and Investor Relations.
(2)The 2020 AIP Award paid to Mr. Flynn was prorated based on the salary and bonus target for the 3 months (October - December) in connection withthe role of SVP and President of CCT and the salary and bonus target for the 9 months (January - September) of his appointment toprevious role as SVP and President, APAC.
(3)Mr. Scalera is the position offormer Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.Financial Officer and eligible for a full-year 2020 bonus.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT45
2016

2020 AIP Performance Metrics and Weightings. PERFORMANCE METRICS AND WEIGHTINGS

Based on the Company's 2016Company’s 2020 business objectives, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee identified four financial performance metrics and an individual component, for the 20162020 performance year, which together comprise the AIP Performance Factor. The following table shows the weighting assigned to each NEO for each AIP performance metric:



27



Named Executive OfficerAdjusted Earnings Per ShareAdjusted ITT Cash FlowAdjusted ITT Operating MarginAdjusted ITT RevenueAdjusted Segment Free Cash Flow
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin 
Adjusted Segment RevenueIndividual Component
Denise L. Ramos30%25%25%10%10%
Thomas M. Scalera30%25%25%10%10%
Luca Savi30%25%25%10%10%
Mary Beth Gustafsson30%25%25%10%10%
Aris C. Chicles30%25%25%10%10%

MetricWeightingReason for SelectionDetails
Adjusted Earnings Per Share or Adjusted EPS20%Important measure of the value provided to shareholdersAdjusted EPS is defined as income from continuing operations attributable to ITT Inc. per diluted share, adjusted to exclude special items on an after-tax basis. The after-tax basis of each special item is determined using the jurisdictional tax rate of where the expense or benefit occurred.
Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow20%Important measure of how the Company converts its net earnings into deployable cashAdjusted Free Cash Flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures, adjusted for cash payments for restructuring costs, realignment actions, other significant items that impact current results which management views as unrelated to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance. Adjusted Free Cash Flow in this Proxy Statement, unlike in our Annual Reports on 10-Ks and Quarterly Reports on 10-Qs, does include net asbestos cash flows. Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow is defined as segment level net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures, adjusted for special items and the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted Segment Operating Margin20%Emphasizes the importance of maintaining healthy marginsAdjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted Segment Operating Margin are defined as the ratio of Adjusted Operating Income or Adjusted Segment Operating Income, over Organic Revenue, adjusted to exclude special items that include, but are not limited to, asbestos-related impacts, restructuring costs, realignment costs, certain asset impairment charges, certain acquisition-related impacts, and unusual or infrequent operating items. Special items represent significant charges or credits that impact the current results, which management views as unrelated to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance.
Organic Revenue and Organic Segment Revenue20%Reflects the Company’s emphasis on growthOrganic Revenue is defined as revenue, excluding the estimated impact of foreign currency fluctuations, acquisitions, and divestitures. Adjusted Segment Revenue is defined as segment level revenue excluding the estimated impact of foreign currency fluctuations, acquisitions, and divestitures. In both cases, divestitures include sales of portions of our business that did not meet the criteria for presentation as a discontinued operation.
Individual Component20%Provides focus on supporting enterprise initiatives that will create growth and increase shareholder value

Each NEO establishes several personal or team goals related to Company initiatives or segment-specific initiatives that are aligned with the strategy of the business and the goals of the CEO. For 2020, the areas established at the start of the performance period were:

  Financial: Deliver on our financial commitments.

  Culture and Talent: Focus on our people and their work environment by continuing our culture journey through engaging and energizing employees around our strategy, purpose and principles, and increasing the skills of our leaders.

  Execution: Differentiate ourselves through safety, effectiveness and efficiency; ensure each part of the organization or segment is optimized and delivering on our commitments to our customers.

  Growth and Innovation: Advance technology and customer relationships to create new opportunities and growth.

  Capital Deployment: Drive actions to optimize the portfolio through mergers and acquisitions and organic investments.

As permitted by the ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee may exclude the impact of acquisitions, dispositionsdivestitures and other special items in computing AIP awards. Special items represent significant charges or credits that impact current results, which management views as unrelated to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance. Special items may include, but are not limited to, asbestos-related costs, restructuring costs, realignment costs, pension settlement and other curtailment costs, certain acquisition-related expenses, income tax settlements or adjustments, and unusual and infrequent items. The four financial performance metrics applicable to each NEO are therefore non-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered a substitute for measures determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies or those that we use in theour Form 10-K or other external financial presentations. Descriptions of each of the performance metrics are as follows:

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT46
Back to Contents
MetricReason for SelectionDetails
Adjusted Earnings Per ShareImportant measure of the value provided to shareholdersReflects the adjusted non-GAAP earnings per share from continuing operations of the Company. Special items may include, but are not limited to, asbestos-related costs, restructuring and realignment, asset impairment charges, unbudgeted acquisition-related expenses, income tax settlements or adjustments, and other unusual or infrequent non-operating items. Special items represent charges or credits on an after-tax basis that impact current results, but may not be related to the Company's ongoing operations and performance.
Adjusted ITT Cash Flow and Adjusted Segment Free Cash FlowImportant measure of how the Company converts its net earnings into deployable cashAdjusted ITT Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measurement defined as consolidated net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures, cash payments for realignment costs, net asbestos cash flows, and other significant items that impact current results that management believes are not related to ongoing operations and performance. Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP measurement, is defined as Segment level net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures and adjusted for special items.
Adjusted ITT Operating Margin and Adjusted Segment Operating MarginEmphasizes the importance of maintaining healthy marginsAdjusted ITT Operating Margin is defined as the ratio of adjusted consolidated operating income, over adjusted consolidated revenue. Adjusted Segment Operating Margin is defined as the ratio of adjusted segment operating income over adjusted segment revenue. Adjustments include, but are not limited to, the impact of unbudgeted acquisitions and divestitures and special items.
Adjusted ITT Revenue and Adjusted Segment RevenueReflects the Company's emphasis on growthAdjusted ITT Revenue is defined as consolidated GAAP revenue excluding the estimated impact of foreign currency fluctuations and the impact from unbudgeted acquisitions and divestitures made in the last 12 months. Adjusted Segment Revenue is defined as segment level GAAP revenue excluding the estimated segment impact of foreign currency fluctuations and the segment impact from unbudgeted acquisitions and divestitures made in the last 12 months.
Individual ComponentProvides focus on supporting enterprise initiatives that will create growth and increase shareholder value
Each NEO establishes several personal or team goals related to Company initiatives or Segment initiatives that are aligned with the strategy of the business and the goals of the CEO. For 2016, four areas that were established at the start of the performance period were:
Portfolio: Drive actions to optimize merger and acquisition activity and integration into current businesses.
Operating System: Differentiate for our customers through strong relationships, operational efficiencies, technology and innovation.
Culture and Talent: Continue our journey by focusing on ITT purpose and principles, enabling our talent and leaders, and implementing our diversity and inclusion strategy.
Execution: Delivering our financial commitments.
2016

2020 AIP Performance Targets and Results. PERFORMANCE TARGETS AND RESULTS

The Adjusted EPS, Adjusted Free Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Margin and AdjustedOrganic Revenue targets were based on the Company's 2016Company’s 2020 operating plan.budget. These targets were set early in 2016, whenFebruary 2020, before the magnitudescope of the global downturn of the oil & gas industryCOVID-19 pandemic was still being realized.known. The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee reviewed the operating planbudget with management to ensure that the targets were appropriate. The Compensationappropriate and Personnel Committee determined that the achievement of the combination of financial goals would be challenging and reflect strong performance. These goals were not adjusted after approval in February 2020. In addition to these metrics, ITT Corporate and each of the Segments have working capital financial targets that if not achieved will result in up to a 5 point reduction of the final AIP financial score. The table below sets forth the target and actual results for each 20162020 AIP financial performance metric at the corporate level.



28



Corporate Financial Performance Targets.
Metric
Threshold
(50%)
Target
(100%)
Maximum
(200%)
2016 Results(1)
2016 Payout
Adjusted Earnings Per Share$2.30$2.55$2.93$2.3152%
Adjusted ITT Cash Flow$126M$149M$178M$154M117%
Adjusted ITT Operating Margin11.9%13.2%15.1%12.0%55%
Adjusted ITT Revenue$2,180M$2,422M$2,665M$2,392M94%
(1)For purposes of the AIP payout calculation, $1M of unbudgeted restructuring savings was excluded from our Adjusted Earnings Per Share and therefore the amount of $2.31 shown in the table is less than the $2.32 reported in our Annual Report Form 10-K.
Segment Financial Performance Targets.

CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE TARGETS

The financial performance targets for Mr. Savi, (Motion Technologies)Mr. Caprais, Ms. Gustafsson and Mr. Chicles (Industrial Process)Scalera reflect ITT Corporate targets.

Metric Threshold
(50%)
 Target
(100%)
 Maximum
(200%)
 2020 Results 2020 Achievement
Adjusted Earnings Per Share $3.48  $3.87  $4.26  $3.20   0%
Adjusted Free Cash Flow $246.6M  $290.2M  $348.2M  $379.8M   200%
Adjusted Operating Margin  14.0%  15.5%   17.8%   14.8%   78.5%
Organic Revenue $2,535M  $2,817M  $3,098M  $2,470M   0%

SEGMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE TARGETS

The financial targets for Mr. Flynn and Mr. Hanna reflect their respective Segments.

Metric
Threshold
(50%)
Target
(100%)
Maximum
(200%)
2016 Results2016 Payout
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin (Motion Technologies)16.0%17.8%20.5%18.2%114%
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin (Industrial Process)13.8%15.3%17.6%7.3%0%
Adjusted Segment Revenue (Motion Technologies)$832M$925M$1,017M$977M157%
Adjusted Segment Revenue (Industrial Process)$843M$937M$1,030M$828M0%
business segments, in addition to the ITT Corporate Adjusted Earnings Per Share target. The Company doesbusiness segments receive an additional benefit to their financial score and bonus payout pool when ITT exceeds financial targets, which did not reportoccur in 2020.

Mr. Flynn held the role of Senior Vice President and President of the Asia Pacific Region from January 2019 until October 2020. In October 2020 he was appointed Senior Vice President and President of the CCT business segment. Mr. Flynn’s 2020 bonus payout is prorated based on the Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow metric, as disclosing this specific target would resultmonths he managed each business segment. The 2020 financial results of CCT were below threshold. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee assessed the overall performance of CCT, including the resiliency of employees in competitive harmadapting to the Company in that it may inform competitorsCOVID-19 pandemic conditions while continuing to serve customers needs and assessed an AIP score of 40%. The CCT AIP score was applied for Mr. Flynn and approximately 260 other partiesemployees eligible for a bonus based on CCT results. The 2020 financial targets and results of the Asia Pacific Region were as follows:

Metric Threshold
(50%)
 Target
(100%)
 Maximum
(200%)
 2020 Results 2020 Achievement
Adjusted Region Free Cash Flow $69.6M $81.9M $98.3M $74.6   70.1%
Adjusted Region Operating Margin  17.1%  19.0%  21.8%  20.1%  137.9%
Organic Region Revenue $374M $416M $457M $353M  0%

Financial Targets and results of the IP business segment, which apply to the basis for future business decisions and provide insights into the Company's confidential planning process and strategies.Mr. Hanna, were as follows:

Metric Threshold
(50%)
 Target
(100%)
 Maximum
(200%)
 2020 Results 2020 Achievement
Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow $103.7M $122.0M $146.3M $200.2M  200%
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin  13.1%  14.6%  16.7%  14.2%  88.1%
Organic Segment Revenue $863M $959M $1,055M $851M  0%

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT47

AIP Individual Component Considerations. INDIVIDUAL COMPONENT CONSIDERATIONS

Each NEO has 10%20% of their AIP bonus target based on the individual component, which rewards achievement of their individual and team goals. The Compensation and PersonalHuman Capital Committee considered the following achievements when determining the individual component payout of each NEO. The considerations for the CEO were described previously in the Executive“Executive Summary. The Industrial Process business did not achieve its goals

Emmanuel Caprais, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:

Delivered strong financial results during a historic market downturn
Increased liquidity and delivered record cash flow to stabilize outlook in an uncertain environment
Strengthened the capability and diversity of the finance function through hires and the development of internal talent

Mary Beth Gustafsson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer:

Managed execution of strategic legal matters that provide a significant financial benefit to ITT
Deeply involved in strategic M&A decision-making
Continued focus on legal cost containment in challenging environment

Ryan F. Flynn, Senior Vice President and President, CCT:

Successfully managed COVID-19 pandemic crisis across APAC region and developed safety protocols shared across ITT globally
Led APAC team to deliver strong financial performance despite market downturn
Transitioned from leading the APAC region to leading the global CCT business quickly and effectively  

George Hanna, Former Senior Vice President and President, IP:

Delivered strong cash flow and operating income despite market downturn
Successfully led the continued turnaround of the IP business and drove operational improvements globally
Gained share in key markets

Thomas M. Scalera, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:

Effectively transitioned CFO role to an internally developed successor
Increased liquidity and delivered record cash flow to stabilize outlook in an uncertain environment

2020 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

In 2020, the Compensation and therefore Mr. Chicles did not receive a bonus paymentHuman Capital Committee approved two types of grants for 2016.

Thomas M. Scalera, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Drove aggressive cost management in the face of declining oil & gas, mining and general industrial markets
Effectively managed the balance sheet and returned $114M to stockholders through share repurchases and dividends
Managed corporate strategy including expanding our portfolio in the transportation market
Luca Savi, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer:
Delivered exceptional financial results for Motion TechnologiesCompany’s annual LTI awards with growth that significantly outpaced the automotive brake pad market
Completed the acquisition of Axtone Railway Components and continued to integrate the Wolverine acquisition
Improved Motion Technologies' competitive position in North America
Mary Beth Gustafsson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer:
Implemented an internal reorganization that separated operating assets from ITT's legacy liabilities and associated insurance assets
Managed complex negotiations of significant legal matters
Continued to improve the execution and efficiency of the legal function
2016 Long-Term Incentive Compensation
In 2016, the Company's LTI program took a portfolio approach by using three distinct vehicles, each addressing long-term shareholder value alignment in different ways. The CompensationCommittee believes that granting a combination of PSUs and Personnel Committee believed these three types of awards in combination were appropriate in 2016 to provideRSUs provides alignment with shareholder alignment,interests, retention value and a direct connection between pay and the opportunity to leverage awards up and down consistent with stock price performance as well asof our Company performance over the long term. In 2016, long-term incentivesThe 2020 LTI award grants for our NEOs were allocated as follows:
50% granted in performance units;
25% granted in Restricted Stock Units (RSUs); and
25% granted in stock options.


29



60% PSUs+40% RSUs

The following table shows the target value of the 2020 LTI award grants made to NEOs in February 2016March 2020 as part of the Company'sCompany’s regular annual compensation process. These LTI values were determined, taking into account base pay and annual incentive values, in developing market competitive total compensation levels and an appropriate mix of fixed versus variable and short-term versus long-term incentives. These values also considered each NEO'sNEO’s role, potential long-term contribution, performance, experience and skills.

Named Executive OfficerPerformance Units (Target Award)RSUs
Stock
Options
Total(1)
Denise L. Ramos $2,250,000
 $1,125,000
 $1,125,000
 $4,500,000
Thomas M. Scalera 450,000
 225,000
 225,000
 900,000
Luca Savi 300,000
 150,000
 150,000
 600,000
Mary Beth Gustafsson 337,500
 168,750
 168,750
 675,000
Aris C. Chicles 390,000
 195,000
 195,000
 780,000

Named Executive Officer PSUs
(Target Award)
 RSUs Total(1)
Luca Savi $2,280,000  $1,520,000  $3,800,000 
Emmanuel Caprais(2)  384,000   376,000   760,000 
Mary Beth Gustafsson  468,000   312,000   780,000 
Ryan F. Flynn  228,000   152,000   380,000 
George Hanna  270,000   180,000   450,000 
Thomas M. Scalera  600,000   400,000   1,000,000 

(1)
(1)The values in this table differ slightly fromreflect target amounts approved by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee; the values reported in the SCT and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2016 table, each of whichtables present the grant date fair value recordedas calculated under GAAP.
(2)Mr. Caprais was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in October and received an LTI award with a target value of $400,000 that was granted as 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs. Mr. Caprais also received an LTI award in March with a target value of $360,000 for accounting purposes.his previous role of Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis and Investor Relations that was granted as 60% RSUs and 40% PSUs.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT48
Performance Units. Performance units

PERFORMANCE STOCK UNITS

PSUs are settled in shares after a three-year performance vesting period, with performance tied equally to the Company's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) relative to the performance of companies in the Representative Peer Group (described on page 25) and the Company'sCompany’s three-year total shareholder return (TSR)TSR performance relative to the performancea group of the S&P 400 Capital Goods Index, of which ITT is a member.

In 2016, the Committee selected Relative ROIC as a metric to better align executive pay with performance against peer companies in driving efficient and disciplined deployment of capital. In previous awards, the ROIC metric payout was based on achievement of a specific target value.
Relative TSR was again selected as a metric by the Committee to ensure executive compensation is aligned with shareholder value creation.
Company’s ROIC.

Delivery of shares generally requires employment throughout the three-year performance period. Performance units thereforePSUs provide alignment with absolute stock performance, relative stock performance, Company performance and potential retention value. There areFor each eligible employee, there may be up to three outstanding performance unit awardsPSU award periods at any time. No dividend equivalents are paid on unvested performance units.

Measuring Relative PSUs.

ROIC Performance

(50% WEIGHTING)

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee approved ROIC as a metric to align executive pay with the Company’s performance in driving efficient and disciplined deployment of capital.
ROIC for the 2016 performance units2020 PSUs is a percentage that will be calculated by dividing (A) after-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the Company, adjusted to exclude the after-tax impact from special items, interest income or expense and amortization of expense from intangible assets by (B) average total assets from continuing operations, less asbestos-related assets (including deferred tax assets on asbestos-related matters) and non-interest bearing current liabilities for the five preceding quarterly periods. Special items represent significant charges or credits that impact results, such as unbudgeted acquisitions or divestitures, but may not be related to the Company'sCompany’s ongoing operations and performance, as disclosed in the Company'sCompany’s filings with the SEC.

RELATIVE TSR (50% WEIGHTING)

Relative TSR was selected by the Committee to ensure executive compensation is aligned with shareholder value creation.
Relative ROICThe relative TSR peer group includes companies in the S&P 400 Capital Goods index and additional companies from the transportation and industrial pump/flow industries (collectively, the “peer companies”) in order to provide a broad set of companies that align with ITT’s portfolio mix.
TSR performance is measured by comparing the average closing stock price for the 2016month of December prior to the start of the three-year performance units will be measuredcycle, to the average closing stock price for the month of December that concludes the three-year performance.
Vesting at the end of the applicable three-year performance period is based on ITT's 2018 ROIC results and the Representative Peer Group companies' ROIC results that most closely align withCompany’s TSR performance ranked against the timingTSR performance of ITT's 2018 year-end closing.the other peer companies.

If Company's Relative ROIC Performance is:
Payout Factor for ROIC Component of
Performance Units*
at the 80th percentile or greater200%
at the 50th percentile100%
at the 35th percentile50%
less than the 35th percentile0%
* Payouts for performance between the percentiles shown are interpolated


30



Measuring Relative TSR Performance
TSR performance is measured for all companies in the index by comparing the average closing stock price for the month of December prior to the start of the three-year performance cycle, to the average closing stock price for the month of December that concludes the three-year performance cycle, including adjustments for reinvested dividends and extraordinary payments.
Vesting at the end of the applicable three-year performance period is based on the Company's TSR performance ranked against the TSR performance of the other companies within the index.
If Company'sCompany’s Relative Total Shareholder Return Performance is:
Payout Factor for TSR Component of
Performance Units*
PSUs*
at the 80th 80th percentile or greater200%
at the 50th 50th percentile100%
at the 35th 35th percentile50%
less than the 35th 35th percentile0%
* Payouts for performance between the percentiles shown are interpolated
Zero Payout on 2014 Performance Units.

*Payouts for performance between the percentiles shown are interpolated.

PAYOUT ON PSUs GRANTED IN 2018

In 2014,2018, ITT granted performance unitsPSUs to certain executives, including each of the NEOs. The three-year performance targets were based equally on the Company'sCompany’s TSR performance relative to the performance of companies in the S&P 400 Capital Goods Index and additional companies from the Company'stransportation and industrial pump/flow industries, and the Company’s ROIC relative to certain performance targets were not met. Therefore the Compensation and Personnel Committee determined that no recipients will receive any value from these awards.

2014-2016 TSR Results: During the three-year performance period, ITT's TSR was at the 19th percentileperformance. The payout of the index2018 PSUs was 159% of companies, which was belowtarget based on the threshold metric of at least the 35th percentile.
2014-2016 ROIC Results: ITT's ROIC performance was 9.4%, which was below the threshold metric of 10.65%.
Restricted Stock Units.following results:

2018-2020 ROIC Results (50% weighting): ITT’s 3-year average ROIC was 11.3%, which was higher than the target of 11.1%. The payout for the ROIC metric was 118% of target.
2018-2020 Relative TSR Results (50% weighting): During the three-year performance period, ITT’s TSR was at the 83rd percentile of the peer companies. The payout for the TSR metric was 200% of target.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

RSUs are settled in shares after a three-year vesting period and provide alignment with stock performance and retention value. Grants of RSUs provide NEOs with stock ownership of unrestrictedITT shares after the restrictions lapse. NEOs receive RSU awards because, in the judgment of the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee, and based on management recommendations, these individuals are in positions most likely to influence the achievement of the Company'sCompany’s long-term value creation goals and to create shareholder value over time. The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee reviews all grants of RSUs for executive officers prior to the award, including awards based on performance, retention-based awards, and

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT49

awards contemplated for new employees as part of employment offers. The CEO has the authority to grant RSUs to other employees in certain situations. These grants are reviewed by the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee at its next scheduled meeting. RSUs do not grant dividend or voting rights to the holder over the vesting period, however, dividend equivalents are accrued and paid after vesting. In certain cases, such as for new hires or to facilitate retention, selected employees may receive RSUs subject to different vesting terms.

Stock Options.Stock options provide the right to buy ITT stock in the future at a price equal to the stock's closing value on the date of the option grant, which is the stock option exercise price. Stock options have a 10 year term and a three-year vesting period for executive officers before becoming exercisable and provide alignment with stock price growth. Stock option awards to employees other than executive officers generally vest one-third per year over the three years. Non-qualified stock option terms were selected after the Compensation and Personnel Committee's review and assessment of market practices and consideration of terms best suited to the Company.
In 2016, the fair value of stock options granted under the employee stock option program was calculated using a binomial lattice valuation model, a financial model used to determine the value of stock options. This model applies a binomial approach to discrete time periods to value the option to purchase a share of stock.
Key elements of the non-qualified stock options granted to NEOs in 2016 were as follows:
The option exercise price of stock options awarded is the NYSE closing price of the Company's common stock on the date the award is approved by the Compensation and Personnel Committee.
Stock options granted to new executives have an exercise price equal to the closing price on the grant date, generally during the first of the month of employment.


31



The 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2011 Plan") prohibits the repricing of, or exchange of, stock options and stock appreciation rights that are priced below the prevailing market price with lower-priced stock options or stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval, except in the event of an equity restructuring.
There may be adjustments to the post-employment exercise period of a stock option grant if an employee's tenure with the Company is terminated due to death, disability, retirement or termination by the Company other than for cause, provided that any post-employment exercise period cannot exceed the original expiration date of the stock option.
Special Grants.

TRANSITION-RELATED GRANTS

In addition to annual LTI awards, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee may award specialother grants in the form of performance units,PSUs, RSUs or stock options. These grants are used to attract new senior executives to ITT, provide additional retention incentive or reward extraordinary performance. One NEO received a special grant in February 2016, which is not reflected in the table above. Ms. Gustafsson received a special grant of $100,000 in RSUs, which vest in full three years after the grant date. The award was granted to recognize Ms. Gustafsson's leadership of ITT's legal team and her performance on several critical projects.

What's New for 2017
For 2017, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee approved a change to the mix of LTIdid not approve any transition awards granted to ourfor executive officers. 2017 LTI awards are comprised of the following:
50% was grantedofficers in performance units (weighted equally based on the Company's Relative ROIC and Relative TSR); and
50% was granted in RSUs.
Stock options were not granted as part of the LTI award mix in 2017. The elimination of stock options was made because RSUs are perceived to have higher executive retention value. However, stock options will continue to be considered for LTI awards in future years.
As previously reported, the Compensation and Personnel Committee increased Mr. Savi's target equity compensation to $900,000 in connection with his appointment to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. During its annual compensation review in February 2017, the Committee approved an increase to Mr. Savi's target equity compensation of $150,000 to $1,050,000 to recognize his exceptional performance. The award was granted on February 23, 2017 and consisted of 50% performance units and 50% RSUs.
2020.

Benefits and Perquisites
BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES

All of the NEOs, except for Mr. SaviFlynn who iswas employed by ITT Italy Holding s.r.l.,China Ltd. during 2020, are eligible to participate in the Company'sCompany’s broad-based U.S. employee benefits program. The program includes the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, which provides before-tax and after-tax savings features, group medical and dental coverage, group life insurance, group accidental death and dismemberment insurance and other benefit plans. Prior to the spin-off of our defense and water businesses on October 31, 2011 which established us as a new diversified global, multi-industrial company (the “Spin Transaction”), employees also participated in a defined benefit pension program.

All of the NEOs, except for Mr. Savi,Flynn, together with most of the Company'sCompany’s other salaried employees who work in the United States, participate in the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, a tax-qualified savings plan, which allows employees to contribute to the plan on a before-tax basis, on an after-tax basis, or as a Roth contribution. The Company makes a core contribution of 3% or 4% of pay to the plan for all eligible employees and matches 50% of employee contributions, up to 6% of pay. The core contribution is 3% for employees whose age plus years of service is less than 50, and 4% for employees whose age plus years of service is at least 50. In addition, employees who were participating in the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan at the time it was frozen, as described below, and whose age andplus years of service was at least 60 at that time, may behave been eligible for up to five years of transition employer contributions following the Spin Transaction. The transition employer contributions ended on October 31, 2016.

The Company provides only those perquisites that it considers to be reasonable and consistent with competitive practices. Perquisites available for Ms. Ramos, Mr. Scalera, Ms. Gustafsson and Mr. Chiclesour U.S.-based NEOs are financial and estate planning reimbursement of up to $15,000 per year. As noted above,Due to the automobile allowance was eliminated on January 1, 2016.impact of the COVID-10 pandemic, reimbursements for this perquisite were suspended from May 2020 through December 2020. Mr. SaviFlynn received a company car, which is on an international assignment from Italy to China and receives a transportation allowancecommon market practice for senior executives based in connection with that assignment. Since 2011, the Company has not provided any tax gross-up for personal income taxes due on these perquisites.



32



Shanghai, China.

Amounts reported as perquisites also include reimbursement of certain relocation-related expenses, which are described in detail in the notes to the "All“All Other Compensation Table" laterTable” in this Proxy Statement.

Retirement Plan for Mr. Savi. Mr. Savi participates in a supplemental retirement plan provided under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement applicablesection entitled “Compensation Tables.”

OTHER COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

ITT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

For periods prior to Dirigenti (Executives) of Industrial companies. These benefits are provided in addition to the Italian government-provided retirement benefits. Under the terms of the plan Mr. Savi can contribute up to €6,000 annually and receive a company matching contribution of up to €6,000.

Employee Benefits for Mr. Savi. Mr. Savi is eligible for other statutory retirement and health and welfare benefits that are generally provided to2020, our employees in Italy that have the classification of Dirigenti (Executive). During Mr. Savi's assignment in China, he and his family will be covered by ITT's international healthcare coverage plan, which covers all employees that participate in an international assignment.
Other Compensation and Benefits
CEO Compensation and Employment Agreement. Ms. Ramos has an employment agreement with the Company that governs the terms of her employment. The agreement was entered into on October 31, 2011 and amended on May 16, 2016 and does not have a stated expiration date. Ms. Ramos' compensation for 2016 is set forth above under the heading "Explanation of the Pay Decisions for our CEO."
If the Company terminates her employment other than for cause (as defined in her employment agreement) and other than as a result of her death or disability, or as an acceleration event, Ms. Ramos will, subject to certain conditions and limitations set forth in her employment agreement, be entitled to severance pay in an amount equal to two times the sum of her then-current annual base salary and target annual incentive payable in installments over 24 months and will also be entitled to receive certain benefits during that time.
If the Company terminates her employment as a result of an acceleration event, Ms. Ramos will, subject to certain conditions and limitations set forth in her employment agreement, be entitled to severance pay in an amount equal to three times the sum of (x) annual base salary and (y) the greater of the annual incentive (assumed at target) or the actual bonus most recently paid, payable in installments over 24 months. In addition, she will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to three times her highest annual base salary rate during the three years preceding termination or the acceleration event times the highest percentage rate of the Company's contributions to the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (such percentage rate not to exceed 7% per year), as well as three years of healthcare benefits and life insurance.
Her current employment agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 16, 2016.
Post-Employment Compensation.
ITT Deferred Compensation Plan.  Our NEOs, except Mr. Savi, areFlynn, were eligible to participate in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. This plan provides United Statesprovided U.S. executives an opportunity to defer receipt of between 2% and 90% of any AIP awards they earn.earned. The amount of deferred compensation ultimately received reflectswould also reflect the performance of benchmark investment funds made available under the ITT Deferred Compensation Planplan as selected by the executive. Participants in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan may elect a fund that tracks the performance of the Company'sITT’s common stock. Beginning in 2020, executives were no longer be able to defer compensation under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan, but will still be entitled to receive any compensation deferred prior to 2020 in accordance with the plan.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT50

ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN

Until October 31, 2011, most of our salaried employees who workworked in the United StatesU.S. participated in the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. Under the plan, participants could elect, on an annual basis, to be covered by either a Traditional Pension Plan (described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading "��Compensation Tables—20162020 Pension Benefits"Benefits”) or a Pension Equity Plan formula for future pension accruals. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was a tax-qualified plan, which provided a base of financial security for employees after they cease working. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was transferred by the Company to Exelis Inc., our defense business that was spun off in the Spin Transaction, effective on October 31, 2011, and both2011. Both service credit and accrued benefits were frozen as of that date, and certain participants arewere eligible to receive transition employer contributions into the ITT Retirement Savings Plan.



33



Severance Plan Arrangements. Exelis, Inc. was later acquired by Harris Corporation and Harris Corporation and L3 Technologies merged in 2019 to become L3Harris Technologies Inc. In 2020, Mr. Scalera was the only NEO with benefits under this plan.

SEVERANCE PLAN ARRANGEMENTS

The Company maintains severance arrangements for most of its senior executives, including all of the NEOs except Mr. Savi.NEOs. These arrangements are included in two plans, one covering most severance circumstances (the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan), and the other covering severance following a change-in-control event (the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan). These plans do not allow for the payment of tax gross-ups on severance pay or other benefits. These plans are regularly reviewed by the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee.

The purpose of the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan is to provide a period of transition for senior executives.executives upon termination of employment. The terms of the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan apply to Mr. Scalera and Ms. Gustafsson,each NEO, however the length of Mr. Scalera'sScalera’s severance benefit is specified in a 2011 employment letter entered into at the time of the Spin Transaction. The severance terms for Ms. Ramos areMr. Flynn were covered under heran employment agreement. The severance terms for Mr. Savi are covered under the National Collective Agreement for the Industrial Sector Managersletter entered into when he was hired by ITT China Ltd. in Italy.2016. This agreement provides Mr. SaviFlynn with termination benefits in the event his employment is terminated for other than cause. In December 2020, Mr. Flynn relocated from China to the U.S. and his severance is now covered by the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan rather than his employment letter. Senior executives, who are full-time salaried employees of the Company or any subsidiary, who are paid under a U.S. payroll and who report directly to the CEO, are covered by the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. The plan generally provides for severance payments if the Company terminates a senior executive'sexecutive’s employment without cause.

In the event that any payment would constitute an excess parachute payment within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, then the aggregate of all payments would be reduced so that the present value of the aggregate of all payments is maximized, but is not subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or the deduction limitation of Section 280G of the Code.

The purpose of the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan is to provide compensation in the case of termination of employment in connection with an acceleration event (defined under the heading "“Compensation Tables—Potential Post—EmploymentPost-Employment Compensation—Change in Control Arrangements"Arrangements”) including a change in control. The ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Pay Plan applies to Mr. Scalera, Mr. Savi, Ms. Gustafsson and Mr. Chicles. The severance terms for Ms. Ramos in the event of an acceleration event are covered under her employment agreement.all NEOs. The provisions of this plan are specifically designed to address the inability of senior executives to influence the Company'sCompany’s future performance after certain change of control events. The plan is structured to encourage executives to act in the best interests of shareholders by providing for certain compensation and retention benefits and payments in the case of an acceleration event.

event and qualifying termination of employment.

These plans, including the potential post-employment payments that our NEOs would receive pursuant to these plans, are described in more detail elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading "“Compensation Tables—Potential Post-Employment Compensation."Compensation.” The severance plans apply to our key employees as defined by Section 409A.

Policies
POLICIES

THE ROLE OF RISK AND RISK MITIGATION

The Role of Risk and Risk Mitigation. In 2016, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee evaluatedregularly reviews risk factors associated with our businesses in determining compensation structure and pay practices. The structure of the Board of Directors'Directors’ committees facilitates this evaluation and determination. More specifically, during 2016, the Chair of the Compensation and Personnel Committee was a member of the Audit Committee. This membership overlap provides insight into the Company's business risks and affords the Compensation and Personnel Committee access to the information necessary to consider the impact of business risks on compensation structure and pay practices. Further, overall enterprise risk is considered and discussed at Board meetings, providing additional important information to the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer attendCEO attends those portions of the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee meetings at which plan features and design configurations of our annual and long-term incentiveLTI plans are considered and approved.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT51

We believe our executive compensation program appropriately balances risk with maximizing long-term shareholder value. The following features of our executive compensation program help to contribute to the achievement of this goal.

Emphasis on Long-Term CompensationBy granting long-term incentive compensation at 42%37% to 70%64% of our NEOs'NEOs’ total compensation package, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee believes that it is encouraging strategies that correlate with the long-term interests of the Company. Our LTI awards, described elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading "2016“2020 Long-Term Incentive Compensation," feature a three-year vesting threshold forat the senior vice presidentspresident level and 10 year stock option terms,above, encouraging behavior focused on long-term value creation. Performance unitsPSUs focus on ITT'sITT’s three-year stock priceTSR and Return on Invested Capital,ROIC performance, encouraging behavior focused on long-term goals while discouraging behavior focused on short-term risks.long- term goals.
Pay Mix15%17% to 33%38% of total target compensation is fixed for NEOs while the remaining total compensation is tied to performance, consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy. As scope of responsibility increases, the amount of performance-based pay increases and fixed pay decreases relative to other officers. Our incentive design provides multiple performance time frames and a variety of financial measures that are intended to drive profitable and sustained growth.


34



Clawback PolicyWe have a policy that provides for recoupment of performance-based compensation, if the Board of Directors determines that a senior executive has engaged in fraud or willful misconduct that caused or otherwise contributed to the need for a material restatement of the Company'sCompany’s financial results. In such a situation, the Board will review all compensation awarded to, or earned by, that senior executive on the basis of our financial performance during fiscal periods materially affected by the restatement. This would include annual cash incentive and bonus awards and all forms of equity-based compensation. If, in the Board'sBoard’s view, the compensation related to our financial performance would have been lower if it had been based on the restated results, the Board will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, seek recoupment from that senior executive of any portion of such compensation as it deems appropriate after a review of all relevant facts and circumstances. The policy covers all executives that receive performance units,PSUs, including our NEOs.
Required Executive Stock OwnershipNEOs are required to own Company shares or share equivalents with a value equal to a multiple of their base salary, as discussed in more detail below. We believe that this requirement aligns their interests with the interests of the Company'sCompany’s shareholders and also discourages behavior that is focused only on the short-term.
Prohibition Against Speculating, Hedging or Pledging StockWe have a policy prohibiting employees from hedging and speculative trading in and out of the Company'sCompany’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options. We also prohibit employees from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

The Board of Directors has authorized the use by executive officers of prearranged trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. Rule 10b5-1 permits insiders to adopt predetermined plans for selling specified amounts of stock or exercising stock options under specified conditions and at specified times. Executive officers may only enter into a trading plan during an open trading window and they must not possess material nonpublic information regarding the Company at the time they adopt the plan. Using trading plans, insiders can diversify their investment portfolios while avoiding concerns about transactions occurring at a time when they might possess material nonpublic information. Generally, under these trading plans, the individual relinquishes control over the transactions once the plan is put into place. Accordingly, sales may occur at any time, including possibly before, simultaneously with, or immediately after significant events involving the Company. Both new plans and modifications are subject to a mandatory "waiting period"“waiting period” designed to safeguard the plans from manipulation or market timing. Trading plans adopted by executive officers are reviewed and approved by the Legal Department.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT52
Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines.
Back to Contents

EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for all of its executive officers, including the NEOs. Executive officers have five years in order to meet the guidelines.

Stock ownership guidelines for officers specify the desired levels of Company stock ownership and encourage a set of behaviors for each officer to reach the guideline levels. The guidelines specify expected stock ownership levels expressed as a multiple of base salary, as set forth in the table below. Only the following equity holdings count towardstoward achieving these ownership levels: shares owned outright, Company unvested RSUs, shares held in the Company'sCompany’s dividend reinvestment plan, shares owned in the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, and "phantom"“phantom” shares held in a fund that tracks an index of the Company'sCompany’s stock in the deferred compensation plan. Stock options and unvested performance units,PSUs, which comprise a significant percentage of total compensation for the CEO and other NEOs, do not count towards the achievement of our executive stock ownership guidelines.

Until an executive has attained the ownership levels set forth in the guidelines, executives are prohibited from selling any restricted stock that vests and becomes unrestricted, as well as required to hold all shares acquired through the exercise of stock options (except to the extent necessary to meet tax and exercise price obligations). Both the The guidelines, and compliance with the guidelines, are monitored periodically. As of the date of this Proxy Statement,December 31, 2020, all continuing NEOs either have met the guidelines, or are on track to meet the guidelines.

Chief Executive Officer5 X6 x Annual Base Salary
Executive Vice Presidents3 X4 x Annual Base Salary
Senior Vice Presidents2 X3 x Annual Base Salary
Selected Vice Presidents1 Xx Annual Base Salary
Considerations of Tax and Accounting Impacts.

HEDGING POLICY

Our NEOs are subject to the Company’s hedging policy described at page 22.

CONSIDERATIONS OF TAX AND ACCOUNTING IMPACTS

In establishing total compensation for the executive officers, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee considershas considered the effect of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.Code and the accounting rules associated with the Company’s compensation programs. As a general matter, Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction for compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to the CEO, the CFO and the three other highest-paid NEOs, other thanNEOs. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) made several changes to Section 162(m), the CFO, unlessmost significant of which was removing an exception for “performance-based” compensation from the calculation of compensation qualifies as "performance-based."




35



Whilesubject to the $1,000,000 deduction limitation.

The primary objective of the Company’s compensation program is to support the Company’s business strategy. Prior to the adoption of the Tax Act, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee generally seekssought to preserve the deductibility of most compensation paid to executive officers, the primary objectivebut believed it also should have flexibility to award non-deductible compensation. As a result of the compensation program is to supportTax Act’s elimination of the Company's business strategy. Thus,exception for performance-based compensation, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee believesdid not design the 2020 executive compensation program to preserve the deductibility of compensation that is paid to executive officers, as it should have flexibility in awarding compensation, even though some compensation awards may result in non-deductible compensation expenses.

Our AIP awards, as well as awards under our LTI program (including performance units, RSUs and stock options), are intendeddid prior to qualify as performance-based compensation deductible under Section 162(m). There can be no guarantee that awards will be treated as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).
For purposes of Section 162(m) compliance in performance units and RSUs, the payout of awards requires the Company to meet a threshold adjusted EBITDA target during the three-year performance period. If the threshold is achieved, the Compensation and Personnel Committee may use discretion and approve payouts that range from zero to 200%adoption of the units initially awarded, depending onTax Act. The elimination of the Company's performance. A threshold adjusted EBITDA target is also used for our AIP awards forperformance-based pay exemption did not otherwise affect the Company’s 2020 executive officers, and if the threshold is achieved then the award is fully funded and the Compensation and Personnel Committee uses discretion to approve a payout according to the established financial performance metrics discussed above in the section entitled "compensation program.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT53

2016 Annual Incentive Plan."COMPENSATION

TABLES

Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned by each of our NEOs.

Name and Principal PositionYearSalaryBonus
Stock Awards(1)
Option Awards(2)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Comp(3)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Comp
Earnings(4)
All Other
Comp(5)
Total
Denise L. Ramos
Chief Executive Officer & President
2016$1,000,000
$
$3,500,125
$1,125,012
$805,000
$35,585
$211,818
$6,677,540
2015992,308

3,335,117
1,062,571
1,162,000
24,729
244,883
6,821,608
2014942,308

2,760,828
907,789
1,412,689
234,036
355,421
6,613,071
Thomas M. Scalera
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2016497,526

700,224
225,002
300,000
4,017
78,681
1,805,450
2015468,077

828,180
200,034
417,525

87,092
2,000,908
2014426,615

512,893
168,588
469,899
18,845
88,073
1,684,913
Luca Savi
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
(6)
2016468,541

466,760
150,002
491,800

635,070
2,212,173
2015460,394

655,384
81,309
432,207

732,586
2,361,880
2014539,162

345,518
77,833
457,725

164,713
1,584,951
Mary Beth Gustafsson
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
2016445,103

625,188
168,752
274,598
1,828
67,288
1,582,757
2015427,192

487,500
162,500
373,438

64,216
1,514,846
2014387,692

897,143
163,407
454,246

40,751
1,943,239
Aris C. Chicles
Former Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process
2016451,793

606,805
195,038

14,250
76,294
1,344,180
2015437,192

588,785
187,543
348,608

144,675
1,706,803
2014428,462

512,893
168,588
382,969
109,950
152,670
1,755,532

                 Change in       
                 Pension       
                 Value and       
                 Non-qualified       
              Non-Equity  Deferred       
Name and
Principal Position
 Year  Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards(1)
  Incentive Plan
Comp(2)
  Comp
Earnings(3)
  All Other
Comp(4)
  Total 
Luca Savi  2020  $832,307  $  $3,993,378  $946,000  $  $853,695  $6,625,380 
Chief Executive Officer  2019   900,000      3,498,822   1,314,000      1,355,751   7,068,573 
and President  2018   649,309      1,582,038   877,630      738,900   3,847,877 
Emmanuel Caprais  2020   377,042      794,785   231,530      36,982   1,440,339 
Senior Vice President and                                
Chief Financial Officer                                
Mary Beth Gustafsson  2020   445,385      820,020   285,000      58,497   1,608,902 
Senior Vice President,  2019   480,174      820,519   502,490      75,576   1,878,759 
General Counsel,                                
Corporate Secretary and                                
Chief Compliance Officer  2018   470,579      770,277   526,250      55,503   1,822,609 
Ryan F. Flynn  2020   367,061      399,626   161,105      305,093   1,232,885 
Senior Vice President                                
and President, Connect &                                
Control Technologies                                
George Hanna(5)  2020   353,310   90,000   473,312   264,000      43,558   1,224,180 
Former Senior Vice                                
President and President,                                
Industrial Process                                
Thomas M. Scalera  2020   498,875      1,051,175   319,200   11,755   75,028   1,956,033 
Former Executive Vice                                
President and Chief  2019   538,135      1,093,625   550,800   14,167   88,142   2,284,869 
Financial Officer  2018   527,694      2,080,799   580,350      85,488   3,274,331 

(1)
(1)Amounts include the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for performance unitsPSUs and RSUs. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 1617, Long-Term Incentive Employee Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 20162020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)Amounts in this column include the aggregate grant date fair value of non-qualified stock option awards in the year of grant based on a binomial lattice valuation. A discussion of assumptions relating to stock option awards may be found in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2016 Form 10-K.
(3)
As described in the "2016“2020 Annual Incentive Plan"Plan” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the amounts reported reflect compensation earned for performance under the annual incentive compensation program for that year. AIP payments were made in March 2017. Ms. Gustafsson deferred 90% of her 2016 AIP payout into the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan.


36



(4)(3)The change in the present value in accrued pension benefits was determined by measuring the present value of the accrued benefit at the representative dates using a discount rate of 4.3% for December 31, 2015 and 4.11% for December 31, 2016 (corresponding to the discount rates used for the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan). This pension plan iswas frozen in 2011 and no additional benefits are being accrued, so the change in Mr. Scalera’s reported pension value reported is a result of changes to the actuarial assumptions used to calculate the present value of the benefits rather than an increase of the benefits. Below isThe actuarial assumptions used to calculate this amount can be found immediately after the change in pension value for each NEO from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016.
Named Executive OfficerITT Salaried Retirement Plan
Denise L. Ramos $14,015
 
Thomas M. Scalera 4,017
 
Luca Savi 
 
Mary Beth Gustafsson 
 
Aris C. Chicles 14,250
 
Assumptions used to calculate the above amounts can be found immediately after the 2016 Pension Benefits table. The value of the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan benefits increased during 2016 due to the decrease in the discount rate and the change in the mortality assumptions as of December 31, 2016. Ms. Gustafsson was hired after October 31, 2011, the date on which the plans were frozen. Mr. Savi is eligible for retirement benefits in Italy.
The non-qualified deferred compensation earnings include investment returns that were in excess of 3.13%, which was 120% of the Applicable Federal Long-term Rate (AFR) in December 2015 when the deferred compensation plan fixed rate option percentage was set. Ms. Ramos received $21,570 and Ms. Gustafsson received $1,828 as a result of the earnings in excess of the AFR. The earnings were calculated by applying the rate of 0.62%, which is the difference between the fixed rate option return of 3.75% and the AFR of 3.13%.
2020 Pension Benefits table.
(5)(4)Amounts in this column for 20162020 represent items specified in the All Other Compensation Table.
Table below.
(6)(5)Mr. Savi’s compensation was converted from Euro (€) to U.S. dollars based onHanna received a cash payment in connection with the average exchange rate forsuccessful close and integration of the year Mr. Savi was paid. The exchange rates used were 1.11, 1.11 and 1.33 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.Rheinhutte Pumpen acquisition.
All Other Compensation Table
 Denise L. RamosThomas M. ScaleraLuca SaviMary Beth GustafssonAris C. Chicles
Executive Perquisites:          
Financial Counseling(1)
 $11,201
 $9,000
 $
 $7,960
 $6,447
Assignment and Relocation Expense(2)
 
 
 384,616
 
 11,538
Total Perquisites 11,201
 9,000
 384,616
 7,960
 17,985
All Other Compensation:          
Tax Reimbursements(3)
 
 
 151,942
 
 
Insurance Benefits(4)
 7,524
 804
 17,851
 2,040
 2,075
Retirement Plan Contributions(5)
 193,093
 68,877
 80,661
 57,288
 56,234
Total All Other Compensation $211,818
 $78,681
 $635,070
 $67,288
 $76,294

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT54

(1)

ALL OTHER COMPENSATION TABLE

                 Thomas 
  Luca  Emmanuel  Mary Beth  Ryan F.  George  M. 
  Savi  Caprais  Gustafsson  Flynn  Hanna  Scalera 
Executive Perquisites:                        
Financial Counseling(1) $  $  $1,575  $  $  $15,000 
Company Car(2)           34,057       
Assignment and Relocation Expense(3)           243,316       
Total Perquisites        1,575   277,373      15,000 
All Other Compensation:                        
Tax Reimbursements(4)  724,098                
Insurance Benefits(5)  4,049   588   3,145      4,641   811 
Vacation Payout(6)           27,720       
Retirement Plan Contributions(7)  125,548   36,394   53,777      38,917   59,217 
Total All Other Compensation $853,695  $36,982  $58,497  $305,093  $43,558  $75,028 

(1)Amounts represent taxable financial and estate planning services fees paid during 2016.
2020, before the program was suspended.
(2)Amounts representMr. Flynn received a company car, which is common market practice for senior executives in China. ITT does not provide a company car perquisite to executive officers in the following:
Mr. Savi started an international assignment in China during 2015. This assignment places one of ITT's senior leaders in China, which is a country with significant potential growth for ITT. In connection with his assignment and pursuant to the ITT International Assignment policy, ITT provides allowances for the costs that Mr. Savi and his family incur in excess of their costs had they remained in Italy. The total amount includes: housing costs in China ($132,727), costs for his children to attend school in China ($112,705), cost of living and hardship allowances ($84,546), transportation costs ($42,388) and other assignment-related costs including China immigration fees.
Mr. Chicles received a taxable $5,000 month allowance that was initiated in June 2014 for housing and commuting expenses in connection with his appointment to lead Industrial Process. In March 2016, Mr. Chicles moved his primary office from Seneca Falls to White Plains, NY and therefore this allowance ceased at that time.


37



U.S.
(3)Under ITT's International Assignment policy, employeesMr. Flynn joined ITT in 2016 as senior executive in China and has received allowances for housing and children’s schooling, which is a common market practice for foreign national executives that reside and work in China. In 2020 Mr. Flynn received reimbursement for housing costs in China ($105,270), and costs for his children to attend school ($108,680). These allowances ceased when Mr. Flynn and his family relocated to the U.S. in December 2020 and he is no longer eligible for assignment related allowances.
(4)Mr. Savi was previously on an international assignment in China that ended in July 2019 with his relocation to another country maintain the tax treatment they would have received if they remained in their home country. Any incremental home or host country taxes associated withU.S. In 2020, the assignment are paid by the Company. The Company paid $77,501$370,965 for taxes and $353,133 for gross-ups for Mr. Savi in connectionassociated with his assignment from Italy to China. In addition, Mr. Savi is a U.S. green card holder and had a U.S.2019 tax liability of $74,441 that was paid by the Companyliabilities for the 2015 tax year.
assignment. Tax gross-ups are only permitted as they relate to international assignments or relocation.
(4)(5)Amounts include taxable group term-life insurance premiums attributable to each NEO, except Mr. Savi. Mr. Savi's insurance benefits include taxable amounts for medical, business trip, life and disability.
U.S. based NEO.
(5)(6)Mr. Flynn received a payout for vacation earned and accrued in China upon his relocation to the U.S. in December. Amounts shown in table were converted from Chinese Renminbi to U.S. dollars based on the 2020 average exchange rate of 0.15.
(7)Amounts represent the total employer contributions under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan. 20162020 contributions to the ITT Retirement Savings Plan are: $24,513 for Ms. Ramos, $18,550$18,795 for Mr. Scalera, $18,550Savi, $19,925 for Mr. Caprais, $20,183 for Ms. Gustafsson, and $18,550$16,731 for Mr. Chicles.Hanna and $20,034 for Mr. Scalera. Contributions to the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan are discussed in the 20162020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table. The amountTable. Retirement plan contributions include a 2.5% discretionary contribution for Mr. Savi is2020 that was credited in February 2021. This discretionary contribution was provided to all employees impacted by the employer contributionsuspension of ITT’s contributions to the Italian statutory termination indemnity fund that would be paid upon termination from the Company.ITT Retirement Savings Plan and ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan in 2020.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT55

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2016
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2020

The following table provides information about 20162020 equity and non-equity awards for the NEOs. The table includes the grant date for equity-based awards, the estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards (which consist of potential payouts under the 20162020 AIP) and estimated future payouts under 20162020 equity incentive plan awards, which consist of potential payouts related to the performance unitsPSUs granted in 20162020 for the 2016-20182020-2022 performance period. Also provided is the number of shares underlying all other stock and option awards, which arefor 2020 were composed solely of RSU and non-qualified stock option awards. The table also provides the exercise price of the non-qualified stock option awards, reflecting the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date and the grant date fair value of each equity award computed under FASB ASC Topic 718. The compensation plans under which the grants in the following table were made are the AIP andunder the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

NameAction DateGrant Date
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(3) (#)
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options(4) (#)
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards(5) ($)
Grant Date Fair Value: Equity Incentive Plan Awards(6)
($)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
 
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Denise L. Ramos2/19/20162/19/2016$500,000
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
        
2/19/20162/19/2016    35,693
71,385
142,770
   $2,374,979
 2/19/20162/19/2016       34,085
  $1,125,146
 2/19/20162/19/2016        123,900
$33.01
$1,125,012
Thomas M. Scalera2/19/20162/19/2016$187,500
$375,000
$750,000
        
2/19/20162/19/2016    7,140
14,280
28,560
   $475,096
 2/19/20162/19/2016       6,820
  $225,128
 2/19/20162/19/2016        24,780
$33.01
$225,002
Luca Savi2/19/20162/19/2016$176,907
$353,813
$707,626
        
 2/19/20162/19/2016    4,760
9,520
19,040
   $316,730
 2/19/20162/19/2016       4,545
  $150,030
 2/19/20162/19/2016        16,520
$33.01
$150,002
Mary Beth Gustafsson2/19/20162/19/2016$167,438
$334,875
$669,750
        
2/19/20162/19/2016    5,355
10,710
21,420
   $356,322
 2/19/20162/19/2016       8,145
  $268,866
 2/19/20162/19/2016        18,585
$33.01
$168,752
Aris C. Chicles2/19/20162/19/2016$170,625
$341,250
$682,500
        
2/19/20162/19/2016    6,188
12,375
24,750
   $411,716
 2/19/20162/19/2016       5,910
  $195,089
 2/19/20162/19/2016        21,480
$33.01
$195,038

    Estimated Future Payouts  Estimated Future Payouts  All Other  Grant Date 
    Under Non-Equity Incentive  Under Equity Incentive  Stock  Fair Value: 
    Plan Awards(1)  Plan Awards(2)  Awards:  Equity 
                      Number of  Incentive 
                      Shares of  Plan 
  Grant Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Stock or  Awards(4) 
Name Date ($)  ($)  ($)  (#)  (#)  (#)  Units(3) (#)  ($) 
Luca Savi 3/4/2020  550,000   1,100,000   2,200,000                     
  3/4/2020              19,278   38,555   77,110       2,473,303 
  3/4/2020                          24,850   1,520,075 
Emmanuel Caprais 3/4/2020  157,500   315,000   630,000                     
  3/4/2020              930   1,860   3,720       119,319 
  3/4/2020                          2,700   165,159 
  3/16/2020              420   840   1,680       37,380 
  3/16/2020                          1,195   51,062 
  10/1/2020              2,125   4,250   8,500       261,758 
  10/1/2020                          2,735   160,107 
Mary Beth Gustafsson 3/4/2020  187,500   375,000   750,000                     
  3/4/2020              3,958   7,915   15,830       507,747 
  3/4/2020                          5,105   312,273 
Ryan F. Flynn 3/4/2020  159,375   318,750   637,500                     
  3/4/2020              1,930   3,860   7,720       247,619 
  3/4/2020                          2,485   152,007 
George Hanna 3/4/2020  150,000   300,000   600,000                     
  3/4/2020              2,285   4,570   9,140       293,166 
  3/4/2020                          2,945   180,146 
Thomas M. Scalera 3/4/2020  210,000   420,000   840,000                     
  3/4/2020              5,075   10,150   20,300       651,123 
  3/4/2020                          6,540   400,052 

(1)
(1)Amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum payment levels, respectively, if an award payout is achieved under the AIP. These potential payments are based on achievement of specific performance metrics and are completely at risk. The AIP targetTarget award is computed based upon the applicable range of net estimated payments denominated in dollars where the target award is equal to 100% of the award potential, the threshold is equal to 50% of target, and the maximum is equal to 200% of target. Zero payment is possible for performance below the threshold. Mr. Savi is employed by ITT Italy Holding s.r.l. and his amounts have been converted from Euro (€) to U.S. dollars using a 2016 average exchange rate of 1.11.


38



(2)Amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum unit levels, respectively, if anof potential PSU award payout is achieved under the Company's performance units.payouts. These potential unit amounts are based on achievement of specific performance metrics and are completely at risk. The performance unitPSU is computed based upon the applicable range of net estimated payments denominated in units where the target award is equal to 100% of the award potential, the threshold is equal to 50% of target and the maximum is equal to 200% of target.
(3)Amounts reflect RSU awards granted in 20162020 to the NEOs.
(4)Amounts reflect non-qualified stock options granted in 2016 to the NEOs.
(5)The stock option exercise price for non-qualified stock options granted in 2016 was the closing price of our common stock on the date the non-qualified stock options were granted.
(6)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for performance unit,PSU and RSU and non-qualified stock option awards granted to the NEOs in 2016.2020. A discussion of assumptions relating to these LTI awards may be found in Note 1617, Long-Term Incentive Employee Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 20162020 Form 10-K.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT56
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year End
  Option Awards Stock Awards
NameGrant DateNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable(1) (#)
Equity 
Incentive Plan Award: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)
Option Exercise Price
($)
Option Expiration Date 
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2)
(#)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(3)
($)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(2)
(#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(3)
($)
Denise L. Ramos11/7/2011150,000


20.28
11/7/2021  
  $
 
$
3/8/2012136,100


22.80
3/8/2022  
  
 

 3/5/2013105,295


26.76
3/5/2023  
  
 

 3/4/2014
74,470

43.52
3/4/2024  20,110
  775,643
 

 2/25/2015
92,720

41.52
2/25/2025  25,595
  987,199
 26,485
1,021,526
 2/19/2016
123,900

33.01
2/19/2026  34,085
  1,314,658
 35,693
1,376,679
Thomas M. Scalera11/7/201149,928


20.28
11/7/2021  
  
 

3/8/201229,115


22.80
3/8/2022  
  
 

 3/5/201322,975


26.76
3/5/2023  
  
 

 3/4/2014
13,830

43.52
3/4/2024  3,735
  144,059
 

 2/25/2015
17,455

41.52
2/25/2025  9,640
  371,815
 4,987
192,349
 2/19/2016
24,780

33.01
2/19/2026  6,820
  263,047
 7,140
275,390
Luca Savi3/8/201213,295


22.80
3/8/2022  
  
 

 3/5/201310,290


26.76
3/5/2023  
  
 

 3/4/2014
6,385

43.52
3/4/2024  4,225
  162,958
 

 2/25/2015
7,095

41.52
2/25/2025  11,595
  447,219
 2,027
78,181
 2/19/2016
16,520

33.01
2/19/2026  4,545
  175,301
 4,760
183,593
Mary Beth Gustafsson3/4/2014
13,405

43.52
3/4/2024  12,815
  494,275
 

2/25/2015
14,185

41.52
2/25/2025  3,915
  151,002
 4,053
156,324
 2/19/2016
18,585

33.01
2/19/2026  8,145
  314,153
 5,355
206,542
Aris C. Chicles3/5/201323,650


26.76
3/5/2023  
  
 

3/4/2014
13,830

43.52
3/4/2024  3,735
  144,059
 

 2/25/2015
16,365

41.52
2/25/2025  4,520
  174,336
 4,675
180,315
 2/19/2016
21,480

33.01
2/19/2026  5,910
  227,949
 6,188
238,671
(1)Stock options vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
Back to Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2020 FISCAL YEAR END

    Option Awards Stock Awards
                    Equity
                  Equity Incentive
        Equity         Incentive Plan Awards:
        Incentive         Plan Awards: Market or
        Plan Award:       Market Number of Payout Value
    Number of Number of Number of     Number Value of Unearned of Unearned
    Securities Securities Securities     of Shares Shares or Shares, Units Shares, Units
    Underlying Underlying Underlying     or Units of Units of or Other or Other
    Unexercised Unexercised Unexercised Option   Stock That Stock That Rights That Rights That
  Grant Options
Exercisable
 Options
Unexercisable
 Unearned
Options
 Exercise
Price
 Option
Expiration
 Have Not
Vested(1)
 Have Not
Vested(2)
 Have Not
Vested(1)
 Have Not
Vested(2)
Name Date (#) (#) (#) ($) Date (#) ($) (#) ($)
Luca Savi 3/8/2012 13,295   22.80 3/8/2022    
  3/5/2013 10,290   26.76 3/5/2023    
  3/4/2014 6,385   43.52 3/4/2024    
  2/25/2015 7,095   41.52 2/25/2025    
  2/19/2016 16,520   33.01 2/19/2026    
  2/26/2018      14,080 1,084,442 23,101 1,779,239
  3/4/2019      21,935 1,689,434 16,963 1,306,490
  3/4/2020      24,850 1,913,947 19,278 1,484,792
Emmanuel 2/26/2018      751 57,842 1,233 94,966
Caprais 3/4/2019      1,440 110,909 743 57,226
  5/23/2019      576 44,364  
  3/4/2020      2,700 207,954 930 71,629
  3/16/2020      1,195 92,039 420 32,348
  10/1/2020      2,735 210,650 2,125 163,668
Mary Beth 2/26/2018      6,855 527,972 11,248 866,321
Gustafsson 3/4/2019      5,145 396,268 3,978 306,386
  3/4/2020      5,105 393,187 3,958 304,845
Ryan F. 2/26/2018      940 72,399 1,543 118,842
Flynn 3/4/2019      2,400 184,848 1,858 143,103
  3/4/2020      2,485 191,395 1,930 148,649
George 2/19/2016 2,190   33.01 2/19/2026    
Hanna 2/26/2018      540 41,591 891 68,625
  3/4/2019      860 66,237 443 34,120
  3/22/2019           1,890 145,568 1,465 112,834
  3/4/2020      2,945 226,824 2,285 175,991
Thomas M. 2/26/2018      9,155 705,118 15,019 1,156,763
Scalera 8/6/2018      8,055 620,396 13,094 1,008,500
  3/4/2019      6,855 527,972 5,303 408,437
  3/4/2020      6,540 503,711 5,075 390,877

(2)(1)RSUs generally vest 100% on the third anniversary of the grant date. Performance unitsPSUs vest upon the completion of a three-year performance period beginning January 1 of the grant year and are shown at threshold payout.payout, with the exception of the PSUs granted on February 26, 2018, which are shown at 159% of target based on the actual three-year relative TSR and ROIC results.
(2)Reflects the Company’s closing stock price of $77.02 on December 31, 2020. Under the Equity Incentive Plan Awards column, the 2014 performance units2018 PSUs granted on March 4, 2014February 26, 2018 vested on December 31, 2020 and are shown as zero because theat 159% of target based on three-year TSR and ROIC performance thresholds were not met.results.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT
(3)Reflects the Company's closing stock price of $38.57 on December 30, 2016. Under the Equity Incentive Plan Awards column, the 2014 performance units granted on March 4, 2014 are shown as zero because the TSR and ROIC performance thresholds were not met.57




Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2016
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2020

The following table provides information regarding the values realized by our NEOs upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock awards in 2016.

 Option Awards Stock Awards
Named Executive Officer# of Shares Acquired on ExerciseValue Realized on Exercise # of Shares Acquired on VestingValue Realized on Vesting
Denise L. Ramos242,237 $3,802,462
 116,742 $4,343,970
Thomas M. Scalera16,329 265,896
 25,471 947,776
Luca Savi(1)
 
 8,844 329,085
Mary Beth Gustafsson 
  
Aris C. Chicles177,728 2,927,925
 35,563 1,323,299
(1)Mr. Savi's 2013 RSU award of 3,531 shares, which vested in 2016, was settled in cash rather than shares, and the value realized was $131,389, which is not included in the table. The 8,844 shares acquired on vesting were for Mr. Savi's 2013 performance units which settled in shares.
2020.

  Option Awards Stock Awards
  # of Shares   # of Shares   
  Acquired on Value Realized Acquired on Value Realized
Named Executive Officer Exercise on Exercise Vesting on Vesting
Luca Savi    $   33,580  $2,110,809 
Emmanuel Caprais        6,396   407,449 
Mary Beth Gustafsson  46,175   1,630,409   22,387   1,407,226 
Ryan F. Flynn          6,545   422,024 
George Hanna        5,355   334,500 
Thomas M. Scalera        29,586   1,859,740 

2016 Pension Benefits
2020 PENSION BENEFITS

Effective on October 31, 2011, all of the Company'sCompany’s pension benefits described in this section were frozen, and the cumulative liability of these benefits was assumed by Exelis Inc. only. Ms. Ramos,Only Mr. Scalera and Mr. Chicles participated in the plans described below and they remainremains eligible for frozen pension benefits under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.

ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN

Under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, participants had the option, on an annual basis, to elect to be covered under either a Traditional Pension Plan or a Pension Equity Plan formula for future pension accruals. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was a funded and tax-qualified retirement program. The plan is described in detail below.

While the Traditional Pension Plan formula paid benefits on a monthly basis after retirement, the Pension Equity Plan formula enabled participants to elect to have benefits paid as a single sum payment upon employment termination, regardless of the participant'sparticipant’s age. The Traditional Pension Plan benefit payable to an employee depended upon the date an employee first became a participant under the plan.

Traditional Pension Plan

TRADITIONAL PENSION PLAN

A participant first employed prior to January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan would receive an annual pension that would be the total of:

2% of his or her "average final compensation" (as defined below) for each of the first 25 years of benefit service, plus
1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each of the next 15 years of benefit service, reduced by
1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.

2% of his or her average final compensation (as defined below) for each of the first 25 years of benefit service, plus
1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each of the next 15 years of benefit service, reduced by
1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.

A participant first employed on or after January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan would receive an annual pension that would equal:

1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each year of benefit service up to 40 years, reduced by
1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.

1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each year of benefit service up to 40 years, reduced by
1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.

For a participant first employed prior to January 1, 2005, average final compensation (including salary and approved bonus or AIP awards) is the total of:

The participant's average annual base salary for the five calendar years of the last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual base salary amount, plus
The participant's average annual pension eligible compensation, not including base salary, for the five calendar years of the participant's last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual compensation amount.


40



The participant’s average annual base salary for the five calendar years of the last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual base salary amount, plus
The participant’s average annual pension eligible compensation, not including base salary, for the five calendar years of the participant’s last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual compensation amount.

For a participant first employed on or after January 1, 2005, average final compensation is the average of the participant'sparticipant’s total pension eligible compensation (salary, bonus and annual incentive payments for NEOs and other exempt salaried employees) over the highest five consecutive calendar years of the participant'sparticipant’s final 120 months of eligibility service.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT58

As it applies to participants first employed prior to January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan, Standard Early Retirement is available to employees at least 55 years of age with 10 years of eligibility service. Special Early Retirement is available to employees at least age 55 with 15 years of eligibility service or at least age 50 whose age plus total eligibility service equals at least 80. For Standard Early Retirement, if payments begin before age 65, payments from anticipated payments at the normal retirement age of 65 (the "Normal“Normal Retirement Age"Age”) are reduced by one-fourth of one percent for each month that payments commence prior to the Normal Retirement Age. For Special Early Retirement, if payments begin between ages 60-64,60- 64, benefits will be payable at 100%. If payments begin prior to age 60, they are reduced by five-twelfths of one percent for each month that payments start before age 60 but not more than 25%. For participants first employed from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004, under the Traditional Pension Plan, Standard Early Retirement was available as described above. Special Early Retirement was also available to employees who attained at least age 55 with 15 years of eligibility service (but not earlier than age 55). For Special Early Retirement, the benefit payable at or after age 62 would be at 100%; if payments commenced prior to age 62 they would be reduced by five-twelfths of one percent for each of the first 48 months prior to age 62 and by an additional four twelfths of one percent for each of the next 12 months and by an additional three-twelfths of one percent for each month prior to age 57.

For participants first employed on or after January 1, 2005, and who retire before age 65, benefits may commence at or after age 55 but they would be reduced by five ninths of one percent for each of the first 60 months prior to age 65 and an additional five eighteenths of one percent for each month prior to age 60.

Pension Equity Plan

PENSION EQUITY PLAN

A participant under the Pension Equity Plan would receive a single sum pension that would equal the total accumulated percentage (as described below) times average final average compensation (as defined above).

Total accumulated percentage is the sum of annual percentages earned for each year of benefit service. The percentage earned for any given year of benefit service ranges from three percent to six percent based on age:

Under age 30: 3% per year of benefit service
Age 30 to age 39: 4% per year of benefit service
Age 40 to age 49: 5% per year of benefit service
Age 50 and over: 6% per year of benefit service

Under age 30: 3% per year of benefit service
Age 30 to age 39: 4% per year of benefit service
Age 40 to age 49: 5% per year of benefit service
Age 50 and over: 6% per year of benefit service

Effective January 1, 2008, the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was amended to provide for a three-year vesting requirement. In addition, for employees who were already vested and who were involuntarily terminated and entitled to severance payments from the Company, additional months of age and service (not to exceed 24 months) were to be imputed based on the employee'semployee’s actual service to his or her last day worked, solely for purposes of determining eligibility for early retirement.

The 20162020 Pension Benefits table provides information on the pension benefits for the NEOs. Ms. Ramos, Mr. Scalera and Mr. Chicles participated under the terms of the plan in effect for employees hired after January 1, 2005. The Traditional Pension Plan accumulated benefit an employee earned over his or her career with the Company is payable on a monthly basis starting after retirement. Employees may retire as early as age 50 under the terms of the plan. Pensions may be reduced if retirement starts before age 65. Possible pension reductions are described above. The Pension Equity Plan benefit can be received as a lump sum or an annuity following termination. Mr. Scalera participated in the Pension Equity Plan formula prior to 2011. Ms. Ramos and Mr. Chicles have always participated only under the Traditional Pension Plan formula. Benefits under this plan are subject to the limitations imposed under Sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code in effect as of December 31, 2011. Section 415 limits the amount of annual pension payable from a qualified plan. For 2016,2020, this limit is $210,000$230,000 per year for a single-life annuity payable at an IRS-prescribed retirement age. This ceiling may be actuarially adjusted in accordance with IRS rules for items such as employee contributions, other forms of distribution and different annuity starting dates. Section 401(a)(17) limits the amount of compensation that may be recognized in the determination of a benefit under a qualified plan. For 2016,2020, this limit is $265,000.



41



2016 Pension Benefits Table
Named Executive OfficerPlan NameNumber of Years Credit Service (#)Present Value of Accumulated Benefit at Earliest Date for Unreduced BenefitPayments During Last Fiscal Year
Denise L. RamosITT Salaried Retirement Plan4.33 $168,587
  $
 
Thomas M. Scalera(1)
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan5.77 47,746
  
 
Luca Savi(2)
ITT Salaried Retirement PlanN/A N/A
  N/A
 
Mary Beth Gustafsson(3)
ITT Salaried Retirement PlanN/A N/A
  N/A
 
Aris C. ChiclesITT Salaried Retirement Plan5.42 161,213
  
 
$285,000.

2020 PENSION BENEFITS TABLE

      Present Value of Payments
    Number of Accumulated Benefit During
    Years Credit at Earliest Date for Last Fiscal
Named Executive Officer Plan Name Service (#) Unreduced Benefit ($) Year ($)
Luca Savi(1) ITT Salaried Retirement Plan N/A N/A N/A
Emmanuel Caprais(2) ITT Salaried Retirement Plan N/A N/A N/A
Mary Beth Gustafsson(2) ITT Salaried Retirement Plan N/A N/A N/A
Ryan F. Flynn(3) ITT Salaried Retirement Plan N/A N/A N/A
George Hanna(2) ITT Salaried Retirement Plan N/A N/A N/A
Thomas M. Scalera(4) ITT Salaried Retirement Plan 5.77 77,125 

(1)As previously described, Mr. Savi became eligible for U.S. benefits in 2020 and is not eligible for pension, however, he continues to have a statutory retirement benefit under Italian law for his previous ITT service in Italy.
(1)(2)Mr. Caprais, Ms. Gustafsson and Mr. Hanna were hired after October 31, 2011, the date on which the plans were frozen, therefore they are not eligible to participate in the plans.
(3)Mr. Flynn was employed by ITT China Ltd. in 2020, and is not eligible for pension.
(4)Mr. Scalera has an accrued benefit under both the Traditional Pension Plan formula and the Pension Equity Plan formula. His lump sum Pension Equity Plan benefit is $50,515$53,744 under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2016.2020.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT
(2)Mr. Savi receives statutory retirement benefits under Italian law and additional benefits applicable to Dirigenti employees.
(3)Ms. Gustafsson was hired after October 31, 2011, the date on which the plans were frozen, therefore she is not eligible to participate in the plans.59

Assumptions used to determine present value as of December 31, 20162020 are generally consistent with those used by Harris CorporationL3Harris Technologies Inc. (the acquirerultimate owner of the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan from Exelis Inc. in 2015)). The assumptions utilized were as follows:

Measurement date: December 31, 2016
Discount Rate: 4.11%
Mortality (pre-commencement): None
Mortality (post-commencement): RP-2014 Annuitant Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females
Mortality projection (post-commencement): Generational projection with MP-2014 Mortality Improvement Scale, with 0.75 Long-Term Rate adjustment factor and 15 year convergence period.
Normal retirement date: age 65
Unreduced retirement date: age 65
Assumed benefit commencement date: age 65
Accumulated benefit is calculated based on credited service and pay as of October 31, 2011
For benefits under the Traditional Pension Plan formula, present value is based on the single life annuity payable at assumed benefit commencement date.
For benefits under the Pension Equity Plan formula, present value is based on projected lump sum value at assumed benefit commencement date; Pension Equity Plan value is projected from December 31, 2016,

Measurement date: December 31, 2020
Discount Rate: 2.41%
Mortality (pre-commencement): None
Mortality (post-commencement): Pri-2012 Healthy Annuitant Mortality Tables, separate rates for males and females
Mortality projection (post-commencement): Generational projection with MP-2020 Mortality Improvement Scale from 2012.
Normal retirement date: age 65
Unreduced retirement date: age 65
Assumed benefit commencement date: age 65
Accumulated benefit is calculated based on credited service and pay as of October 31, 2011
For benefits under the Traditional Pension Plan formula, present value is based on the single life annuity payable at assumed benefit commencement date.
For benefits under the Pension Equity Plan formula, present value is based on projected lump sum value at assumed benefit commencement date; Pension Equity Plan value is projected from December 31, 2020, to age 65 using an interest crediting rate of 1.55% for the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.
All results shown are estimates only; actual benefits will be based on precise credited service and compensation history, which will be determined at benefit commencement date.

2020 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.

All results shown are estimates only; actual benefits will be based on precise credited service and compensation history, which will be determined at benefit commencement date.
2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
ITT Deferred Compensation Plan.DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

The ITT Deferred Compensation Plan is a tax deferral plan.plan that was frozen to new deferrals effective as of 2020. The ITT Deferred Compensation Plan permitspermitted eligible employees with a base salary of at least $200,000 to defer between 2% and 90% of their AIP payment. The AIP amount deferred is included in the Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. Withdrawals under the plan are available on payment dates elected by participants at the time of the deferral election. The withdrawal election is irrevocable, except in cases of demonstrated hardship due to an unforeseeable emergency as provided by the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred will be unsecured general obligations of the Company to pay the deferred compensation in the future and employees will have the rights of an unsecured general creditor with respect to those funds.

Participants can elect to have their account balances allocated into one or more of the 25 phantom investment funds (including a phantom Company stock fund) and can change their investment allocations on a daily basis. All plan accounts are maintained on the accounts of the Company and investment earnings are credited to a participant'sparticipant’s account (and charged to corporate earnings) to mirror the investment returns achieved by the investment funds chosen by that participant.



42



A participant can establish up to six "accounts"“accounts” into which AIP award deferrals are credited and he or she can elect a different form of payment and a different payment commencement date for each "account."“account.” One account may be selected based on a termination date (the "Termination Account"“Termination Account”) and five accounts are based on employee-specified dates (each a "Special“Special Purpose Account"Account”). Each Special Purpose Account and Termination Account may have different investment and payment options. Termination Accounts will be paid in the seventh month following the last day worked. Changes to Special Purpose Account distribution elections must be made at least 12 months before any existing benefit payment date, may not take effect for at least 12 months, and must postpone the existing benefit payment date by at least five years. Additionally, Termination Account distribution elections are irrevocable.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT60
Back to Contents

The table below shows the annual rate of return for the funds available under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan, as reported by the administrator for the calendar year ended December 31, 2016.

Name of FundRate of Return 1/1/16 to 12/31/16Name of FundRate of Return 1/1/16 to 12/31/16
Fixed Rate Option(1)
3.75%American Funds EuroPacific Growth (REREX)0.69%
PIMCO Total Return Institutional (PTTRX)2.59%First Eagle Overseas A (SGOVX)5.59%
PIMCO Real Return Institutional (PRRIX)5.03%Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Open (LZOEX)20.17%
T Rowe Price High Yield (PRHYX)14.51%Clearbrige Small Cap Growth IS (LMOIX)6.25%
Dodge & Cox Stock (DODGX)21.28%DFA US Targeted Value I (DFFVX)26.86%
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Inv (VDVIX)2.36%Invesco Global Real Estate A (AGREX)1.57%
Vanguard 500 Index (VFINX)11.82%
Model Portfolio(2) — Conservative
3.89%
American Funds Growth Fund of America R4 (RGAEX)8.44%
Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate Conservative
6.45%
Artisan Mid Cap (ARTMX)(0.89)%
Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate
8.32%
Vanguard Selected Value Inv (VASVX)16.34%
Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate Aggressive
9.70%
Vanguard Federal Money Market Inv (VMFXX)0.30%
Model Portfolio(2) — Aggressive
10.50%
Harbor International (HIINX)(0.14)%ITT Stock Fund (ITT)7.61%
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index (VBMFX)2.50%  
2020.

  Rate of   Rate of
  Return   Return
  1/1/20 to   1/1/20 to
Name of Fund 12/31/20 Name of Fund 12/31/20
Fixed Rate Option(1) 3.00% American Funds EuroPacific Growth (REREX) 24.81%
PIMCO Total Return Institutional (PTTRX) 8.88% First Eagle Overseas A (SGOVX) 6.95%
PIMCO Real Return Institutional (PRRIX) 12.09% Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Open (LZOEX) (0.29)%
T Rowe Price High Yield (PRHYX) 4.95% Clearbrige Small Cap Growth IS (LMOIX) 44.01%
Dodge & Cox Stock (DODGX) 7.16% DFA US Targeted Value I (DFFVX) 3.77%
American Funds Growth Fund of America R4 (RGAEX) 37.79% Invesco Global Real Estate A (AGREX) (12.44)%
Vanguard 500 Index Admiral (VFIAX) 18.37% Model Portfolio(2) — Conservative 8.64%
Vanguard Selected Value Inv (VASVX) 5.85% Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate Conservative 10.34%
Artisan Mid Cap (ARTMX) 58.75% Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate 11.52%
Hartford Schroders Int’l Multi-Cap Value S (SIDRX) 1.14% Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate Aggressive 12.47%
Vanguard Federal Money Market Inv (VMFXX) 0.45% Model Portfolio(2) — Aggressive 13.66%
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Adm (VBTLX) 7.72% ITT Stock Fund (ITT) 30.72%
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Adm (VTMGX) 10.26%    

(1)
(1)The Fixed Rate Option rate is based on guaranteed contractual returns from the insurance company provider.
(2)The returns shown in the model portfolio are not subsidized by the Company, but represent returns for a managed portfolio based on funds available to deferred compensation participants.

ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan.SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

Since federal law limits the amount of compensation that can be used to determine employee and employer contribution amounts to the tax-qualified plan to $265,000($285,000 in 2016,2020), the Company has established and maintains a non-qualified unfunded ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan to allow for Company contributions based on base salary and actual annual bonus paid in excess of these limits. All balances under this plan are maintained on the books of the Company and earnings are credited to the accumulated savings under the plan based on the earnings in the Stable Value Fund in the tax-qualified plan. Benefits will be paid in a lump sum in the seventh month following the last day worked. Effective January 1, 2012, the plan was amended to no longer permit employee contributions.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT61

43




2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

2020 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

The table below shows nonqualified deferred compensation activity for the NEOs for 2016.

Name
Executive Contributions Last Fiscal Year(1)
Registrant Contributions Last Fiscal Year(2)
Aggregate Earnings Last Fiscal Year(3)
Aggregate Withdrawals/DistributionsAggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End
Denise L. Ramos          
Non-qualified savings $
 $168,580
 $14,665
 $
 $825,503
Deferred compensation
 
 132,033
 160,804
 3,621,781
Total 
 168,580
 146,698
 160,804
 4,447,284
Thomas M. Scalera          
Non-qualified savings 
 50,327
 3,007
 
 192,379
Deferred compensation
 
 
 
 
Total 
 50,327
 3,007
 
 192,379
Luca Savi          
Non-qualified savings 
 
 
 
 
Deferred compensation
 
 
 
 
Total 
 
 
 
 
Mary Beth Gustafsson          
Non-qualified savings 
 15,211
 996
 
 68,815
Deferred compensation336,094
 23,527
 11,059
 
 370,680
Total 336,094
 38,738
 12,055
 
 439,495
Aris C. Chicles          
Non-qualified savings 
 37,684
 4,553
 
 283,434
Deferred compensation
 
 
 
 
Total 
 37,684
 4,553
 
 283,434
Note:  "Non-qualified savings" represent amounts in the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan. "Deferred compensation" earnings under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan are calculated by reference to actual earnings of the investment funds as provided in the table above.
2020.

Name Executive
Contributions
Last Fiscal Year(1)
  Registrant
Contributions
Last Fiscal Year(2)
  Aggregate
Earnings Last
Fiscal Year
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
  Aggregate Balance
at Last Fiscal
Year End(3)
 
Luca Savi                    
Non-qualified savings $  $106,753  $1,671  $  $114,756 
Deferred compensation               
TOTAL $  $106,753  $1,671  $  $114,756 
Emmanuel Caprais                    
Non-qualified savings $  $16,469  $1,636  $  $87,859 
Deferred compensation               
TOTAL $  $16,469  $1,636  $  $87,859 
Mary Beth Gustafsson                    
Non-qualified savings $  $33,594  $3,905  $  $201,973 
Deferred compensation        (159,771)     1,040,826 
TOTAL $  $33,594  $(155,866) $  $1,242,799 
Ryan F. Flynn                    
Non-qualified savings $  $  $  $  $ 
Deferred compensation               
TOTAL $  $   $   $  $  
George Hanna                    
Non-qualified savings $  $2,489  $620  $  $32,483 
Deferred compensation  281,385   19,697   37,956   173,097   372,151 
TOTAL $281,385  $22,186  $38,576  $173,097  $404,634 
Thomas M. Scalera                    
Non-qualified savings $���  $39,183  $8,204  $  $411,762 
Deferred compensation                    
TOTAL $  $39,183  $8,204  $  $411,762 

Note:“Non-qualified savings” represent amounts in the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan. “Deferred compensation” earnings under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan are calculated by reference to actual earnings of the investment funds as provided in the table above.

(1)Employee elected contributions to the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan were frozen in 2020, therefore no additional executive contributions are allowed after 2020.
(1)(2)Ms. Gustafsson deferred a portion of her 2015 bonus that was paid in March 2016. None of the other NEOs elected to defer their 2015 bonus.
(2)Amounts represent the core, match and applicable transition employer contributions into the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (Non-qualified savings) and.
(3)Non-qualified savings plan balances include a 2.5% discretionary contribution for 2020 that was credited in February 2021. This discretionary contribution was provided to all employees impacted by the suspension of ITT’s contributions to the ITT Deferred CompensationRetirement Savings Plan (Deferred compensation).and ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan in 2020.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT
(3)As noted in the Summary Compensation Table, the fixed rate investment option in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan was set at 3.75% for 2016. The rate exceeded the Applicable Federal Long-term Rate of 3.13% by 0.62 percentage points. Ms. Ramos received $21,570 and Ms. Gustafsson received $1,828 as a result as a result of the earnings in excess of the AFR. The rate of 3.75% is based on a guaranteed contractual return from the insurance company provider.62

Potential Post-Employment Compensation
POTENTIAL POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

The potential post-employment compensation tables reflect the amount of compensation payable to each of the NEOs in the event their ITT employment with us ceases, including voluntary termination, termination for cause, death or disability, termination without cause, or termination in connection with a change of control, except with respect to Mr. Chicles, whose actual post-employment compensation is reflected.control. Post-separation compensation of our NEOs, other than Mr. Savi,Flynn, is governed by the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan. In addition, post-separation compensation of all of our NEOs is governed by the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan (applicable to situations involving a change of control) and our equity award agreements. In the case of Mr. Scalera, the length of his severance benefit is specified in a 2011 employment letter entered into at the time of the Spin Transaction. Ms. Ramos' post-separation compensation and the severance terms applicable to her in the event of an acceleration event are covered under her employment agreement.

The amounts shown in the potential post-employment compensation tables are estimates, assuming that the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2016,2020, including amounts that would be earned through such date (or



44



that would be earned during a period of severance), and where applicable, are based on the closing price of the Company'sCompany’s stock on December 30, 2016,31, 2020, the last trading day of 2016,2020, which was $38.57.
$77.02.

The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive'sexecutive’s separation from the Company.

Payments and Benefits Provided Generally to Salaried Employees.    

PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS PROVIDED GENERALLY TO SALARIED EMPLOYEES

The amounts shown in the tables in this section do not include payments and benefits to the extent these payments and benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. These include:

Accrued salary and vacation pay.
Regular pension benefits under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan (frozen as of the date of the Spin Transaction and transferred to Exelis Inc., which was acquired by Harris Corporation). ITT participants do not accrue any additional service credit under the plan in the event of a termination. See the section "Post-Employment Compensation" in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more information.
Health care benefits provided to retirees under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, including retiree medical and dental insurance (if eligible as of the date of the Spin Transaction). Employees who terminate prior to retirement are eligible for continued benefits under COBRA.
Distributions of plan balances under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and amounts under the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan.

Accrued salary and vacation pay.
Regular pension benefits under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan (frozen as of the date of the Spin Transaction and transferred to L3Harris Technologies Inc.). ITT participants do not accrue any additional service credit under the plan in the event of a termination. See the section “Post-Employment Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more information.
Health care benefits provided to retirees under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, including retiree medical and dental insurance (if eligible as of the date of the Spin Transaction). Employees who terminate prior to retirement are eligible for continued benefits under COBRA.
Distributions of plan balances under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and amounts under the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan.

No perquisites are available to any NEOs in any of the post-employment compensation circumstances. With respect to the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, frozen benefits under such plan may be deferred to age 65, but may become payable at early retirement age, or earlier for benefits under the Pension Equity Plan formula. Employees of the Company do not have to terminate employment in order to receive their benefits from the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan since the plan is now sponsored by Harris Corporation.

L3Harris Technologies Inc.

ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan.SENIOR EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

The ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan provides overall cash severance benefits to executives, provides participants with outplacement assistance for one year and does not allow for the vesting of equity awards during the severance period. The amount of severance pay under this plan depends on the executive'sexecutive’s base pay and years of service, not to exceed 12  months of base pay. The Company considers these severance pay provisions appropriate transitional provisions given the job responsibilities and competitive market in which senior executives function.

No severance is provided if an employee is terminated for cause, because the Company believes employees terminated for cause should not receive additional compensation.

In addition, the Company'sCompany’s obligation to continue severance payments stops if the executive does not comply with the Company'sCompany’s Code of Corporate Conduct. We consider this cessation provision to be critical to the Company'sCompany’s emphasis on ethical behavior. The Company'sCompany’s obligation to continue severance payments also stops if the executive does not comply with non-competition provisions of the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. These provisions protect the integrity of our businesses and are consistent with typical commercial arrangements.

If a covered executive receives or is entitled to receive other compensation from another company, the amount of that other compensation could be used to offset amounts otherwise payable under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. For six months following the termination date, the executive will continue to be eligible for healthcare benefits and for 12 months the executive will entitled to outplacement support. Severance pay will start within 60 days following the covered executive'sexecutive’s scheduled termination date.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT63
Ms. Ramos.    Under the terms of Ms. Ramos' employment agreement, should Ms. Ramos be terminated by the Company other than for cause and other than in the event of a change of control, Ms. Ramos is entitled to a severance benefit in an amount equal to two times the sum of her then-current base salary and target annual incentive. The information under the heading "CEO Compensation and Employment Agreement" and the Potential Post-Employment Compensation table for Ms. Ramos below provides additional information.
Back to Contents


45



ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan.SENIOR EXECUTIVE CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

This plan provides two levels of benefits for covered executives, based on their position within the Company. The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee considered two levels of benefits appropriate based on the relative ability of each level of employee to influence future Company performance. Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents receive the higher level and certain Vice Presidents the second level. Under the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, if a covered executive is terminated within two years of a change in control or in contemplation of a change in control event that ultimately occurs or if the covered executive terminates his or her employment for good reason within two years of a change in control, he or she would be entitled to:

Any accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus (AIP award), vacation and unreimbursed expenses;
Two or three times the current base salary and target annual incentive as of the termination date;
A lump sum payment equal to two or three times the highest annual base salary rate during the three years preceding termination or an acceleration event times the highest percentage rate of the Company's contributions to the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, such percentage rate not to exceed 7% per year;
Subsidized healthcare benefits for six months after termination; and
One year of outplacement assistance.

Any accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus (AIP award), vacation and unreimbursed expenses;
Two or three times the current base salary and target annual incentive as of the termination date;
A lump sum payment equal to two or three times the highest annual base salary rate during the three years preceding termination or an acceleration event times the highest percentage rate of the Company’s contributions to the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, such percentage rate not to exceed 7% per year;
Subsidized healthcare benefits for six months after termination; and
One year of outplacement assistance.

All of the NEOs other than Ms. Ramos, are covered at the highest level of benefits. The severance terms for Ms. Ramos in the occurrence of an acceleration event are covered under her employment agreement.

Change in Control Arrangements.

CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

There are change in control provisions in various Company plans, which were adopted to mitigate the concern that, in the event the Company is considering a change in control transaction, the employees involved in considering the transaction might otherwise be motivated to act in their own interests rather than in the interests of the shareholders.

The payment or vesting of awards or benefits under certain of the plans listed below are accelerated solely upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. As described on the next page, our equity plans and our severance pay plans have "double“double triggers," requiring both a change in control and a termination of employment to accelerate the vesting of unvested awards.

The following Company plans have change in control provisions:

2011 Omnibus Incentive PlanITT Change in Control Severance Pay Plan
2003 Equity Incentive PlanITT Deferred Compensation Plan
ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive OfficersITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan

ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan
Ramos Employment AgreementITT Change in Control Severance Pay Plan
ITT Deferred Compensation Plan
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan

The 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, and ITT Change in Control Severance Pay Plan consider a change in control to have occurred if one of the following acceleration events occurs:

1.A report on Schedule 13D was filed with the SEC disclosing that any person, other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary, had become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company'sCompany’s outstanding stock.
2.A person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary purchased the Company'sCompany’s shares in connection with a tender or exchange offer, if after consummation of the offer the person purchasing the shares is the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company'sCompany’s outstanding stock.
3.The shareholders of the Company approved, and the Company fully executed:

(a)Any consolidation, business combination or merger of the Company other than a consolidation, business combination or merger in which the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to the merger would hold 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company or the surviving corporation of the merger and would have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation that they held in the Company immediately prior to the merger; or
(b)Any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

4.A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company changed within a 12 month period, unless the election or nomination for election of each of the new directors by the Company's shareholders had been approved by two-thirds of the directors still in office who had been directors at the beginning of


46



the 12 month period or whose nomination for election or election was recommended or approved by a majority of directors who were directors at the beginning of the 12 month period.
5.Any person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary became the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company's outstanding stock.
The ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan and ITT Deferred Compensation Plan consider a change in control to have occurred if one of the following acceleration events occurs:
1.A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company changed within a 12 month period, unless the election or nomination for election of each of the new directors by the Company'sCompany’s shareholders had been approved by two-thirds of the directors still in office who had been directors at the beginning of the 12 month period or whose nomination for election or election was recommended or approved by a majority of directors who were directors at the beginning of the 12 month period.
5.Any person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary became the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT64

The ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan and ITT Deferred Compensation Plan consider a change in control to have occurred if one of the following acceleration events occurs:

1.A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company changed within a 12-month period, unless the election or nomination for election of each of the new directors by the Company’s shareholders had been approved by two-thirds of the directors still in office who had been directors at the beginning of the 12-month period or whose nomination for election or election was recommended or approved by a majority of directors who were directors at the beginning of the 12-month period.
2.Any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), acquires ownership of shares that, together with shares held by such person or group constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the shares of the Corporation.
3.Either (i) a person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), acquires ownership of shares possessing 30% or more of the total voting power of the shares of the Corporation, taking into account all such shares acquired during the 12 month12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition, or (ii) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors is replaced during any 12 month12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of such Board of Directors prior to the date of the appointment or election, but only if no other corporation is a majority shareholder.
4.A change in the ownership of a substantial portion of assets occurs on the date on which any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), other than a person or group of persons that is related to the Company, acquires assets that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions, taking into account all such assets acquired during the 12 month12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition.

Beginning with the Company'sCompany’s annual grant cycle in March 2014, all long-term incentive awards (performance units,(PSUs, RSUs and stock options) have included a "double trigger"“double trigger” provision, whereby no benefits will be paid to an executive unless (i) a change in control of the Company has occurred and (ii) there has been a specified change in the employment status of the executive within a period of time following the change in control. For example, if a covered executive is terminated without cause within two years of a change in control or terminates his or her employment for good reason within two years of a change in control, or is terminated before the change in control occurs, but after its announcement or at the request of a participant, he or she would be entitled to vesting of long-term incentive awards pursuant to the award agreements. The ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Plan and ITT Change in Control Severance Pay Plan also have double trigger provisions. We utilize "double trigger"“double trigger” vesting to ensure management talent will be available to assist in the successful integration following a change in control and to align with prevailing governance practices.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT65

Potential post-employment compensation arrangements are more fully described for the NEOs in the following table. As noted above, this table assumes a triggering event as of December 31, 2016.



47



 Resignation or Termination for Cause
Death or
Disability
 
Termination
Not For Cause
 Termination Not For Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control
Denise L. Ramos            
Cash Severance(1)
 $
  $
  $2,000,000
  $3,000,000
 
AIP 
  
  2,000,000
  3,000,000
 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)
 
  8,562,757
  4,150,642
  8,562,757
 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)
 
  
  
  210,000
 
Other Benefits(4)
 
  
  59,124
  73,686
 
Total(5)
 $
  $8,562,757
  $8,209,766
  $14,846,443
 
Thomas M. Scalera            
Cash Severance(1)
 $
  $
  $583,333
  $1,500,000
 
AIP 
  
  
  1,125,000
 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)
 
  1,852,213
  910,698
  1,852,213
 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)
 
  
  
  105,000
 
Other Benefits(4)
 
  
  37,896
  37,896
 
Total(5)
 $
  $1,852,213
  $1,531,927
  $4,620,109
 
Luca Savi            
Cash Severance(1)
 $
  $
  $471,750
  $1,415,250
 
AIP 
  
  
  1,061,438
 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)
 
  1,400,917
  723,551
  1,400,917
 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)
 
  
  
  
 
Other Benefits(4)
 
  
  30,000
  30,000
 
Total(5)
 $
  $1,400,917
  $1,225,301
  $3,907,605
 
Mary Beth Gustafsson            
Cash Severance(1)
 $
  $
  $412,154
  $1,339,500
 
AIP 
  
  
  1,004,625
 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)
 
  1,788,456
  1,074,417
  1,788,456
 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)
 
  
  
  93,765
 
Other Benefits(4)
 
  
  37,896
  37,896
 
Total(5)
 $
  $1,788,456
  $1,524,466
  $4,264,242
 
Aris C. Chicles(6)
            
Cash Severance(1)
 $
  $
  $530,833
  $
 
AIP 
  
  
  
 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)
 
  
  859,926
  
 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)
 
  
  
  
 
Other Benefits(4)
 
  
  37,896
  
 
Total(5)
 $
  $
  $1,428,655
  $
 
2020.

        Termination Not For 
  Resignation or      Cause or With Good 
  Termination for       Death or      Termination Not       Reason After Change 
  Cause  Disability  For Cause  of Control 
Luca Savi                   
Cash Severance(1) $  $  $1,000,000  $3,000,000 
AIP           3,300,000 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)     12,048,377   6,998,101   15,341,999 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)           210,000 
Other Benefits(4)        40,271   40,271 
TOTAL(5) $  $12,048,377  $8,038,372  $21,892,270 
Emmanuel Caprais                
Cash Severance(1) $  $  $450,000  $1.350,000 
AIP           1,012,500 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)     1,468,329   579,028   1,851,630 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)           94,500 
Other Benefits(4)        40,271   40,271 
TOTAL(5) $  $1,468,329  $1,069,299  $4,348,901 
Mary Beth Gustafsson                
Cash Severance(1) $  $  $500,000  $1,500,000 
AIP           1,125,000 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)     3,408,620   2,306,592   4,131,599 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)           105,001 
Other Benefits(4)        37,036   37,036 
TOTAL(5) $  $3,408,620  $2,843,628  $6,898,636 
Ryan F. Flynn(6)                
Cash Severance(1) $  $  $212,500  $1,275,000 
AIP           956,250 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)     1,150,856   632,693   1,495,078 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)            
Other Benefits(4)        30,000   30,000 
TOTAL(5) $  $1,150,856  $875,193  $3,756,328 
George Hanna                
Cash Severance(1) $  $  $400,000  $1,200,000 
AIP            900,000 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)     1,194,611   601,332   1,575,641 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)           72,001 
Other Benefits(4)        33,470   33,470 
TOTAL(5) $  $1,194,611  $1,034,802  $3,781,112 
Thomas M. Scalera(7)                
Cash Severance(1) $  $  $653,333  $1,680,000 
AIP           1,260,000 
Unvested Equity Awards(2)     6,119,647   4,551,402   7,062,792 
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3)           100,800 
Other Benefits(4)        37,037   37,037 
TOTAL(5) $  $6,119,647  $5,241,772  $10,140,629 

(1)
(1)Under the terms of Ms. Ramos' employment agreement, should she be terminated other than for cause and other than for an acceleration event, Ms. Ramos will be entitled to receive severance pay in an amount equal to two times the sum of her (x) annual base salary and (y) target annual incentive. Under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, and taking into account Mr. Scalera'sScalera’s 2011 employment letter entered into at the time of the Spin Transaction, and as described elsewhere in this section, the other NEOs willfollowing executives would receive base salary after termination without cause for the following severance periods: Mr. Scalera 14Savi 12 months, Mr. SaviCaprais 12 months, Ms. Gustafsson 48 weeks,12 months, Mr. Flynn 6 months, Mr. Hanna 12 months, and Mr. ChiclesScalera 14 months. In the event of termination following a change of control, all NEOs with the exception of Ms. Ramos, are covered under the Company'sCompany’s ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan described elsewhere in this section and, under the terms of the plan, would be paid a lump sum payment equal to the sum of (x) three (3) times the current annual base salary rate paid at the time of termination of employment, and (y) three (3) times the current annual bonus paid or awarded (whether or not deferred). In the event of termination following a change of control, Ms. Ramos will, subject

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT66
(2)
(2)Unvested equity awards reflect the market value of stock and in the money value of stock options based on the Company'sCompany’s December 30, 201631, 2020 closing stock price of $38.57.$77.02. The value of PSUs under Terminate Not for Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control is calculated using a payout of 159%, which is the greater of target payout and last year’s (2018) PSU payout. Termination provisions are set forth in the specific award agreements.


48



(3)No additional ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan payments are made in the event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination for cause. Amount reflects the additional cash payment representing Company contributions, which would be made following a change of control as described in the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan.
(4)"Other Benefits" includes healthcare benefits and outplacement services. Under Ms. Ramos' employment agreement, Ms. Ramos will continue to be eligible to participate in Company benefit plans for a period of two years after termination not for cause. Under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and the other NEOsITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, eligible executives will continue to receive subsidized healthcare benefits during the severance period for the first six months after termination without cause. In the eventSenior executives are eligible for up to one year of a changeoutplacement services with an estimated value of control, Ms. Ramos will continue to be eligible to participate in Company benefit plans for a period of three years as outlined in her employment agreement. The other NEOs are covered under the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, and will receive subsidized healthcare benefits during the severance period for the first six months after termination without cause.
$30,000.
(5)Values in this table show the full payments per the applicable plan documents under the potential termination scenarios. In the event of a change of control a "best net"“best net” provision would apply, which provides either an unreduced benefit or a reduction in payments sufficient to avoid triggering an excise tax, whichever is better after-tax.
(6)As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Chicles will depart the Company effective March 30, 2017. The values reported in this table reflect the amounts that we will pay to Mr. Chicles pursuantFlynn’s post-employment compensation was determined by his employment agreement. He has since transferred to the terms of his separation agreementU.S. and applicable award agreements for equity incentive awards grantedis now covered under the 2011ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan.
(7)Mr. Chicles' departure is regardedScalera separated from ITT on January 6, 2021. The post-employment compensation amounts were applicable as a termination not for cause for purposes of his LTI awards.December 31, 2020.

CEO PAY RATIO

We are required to calculate and report a reasonable estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median annual total compensation of our other employees. For 2020, we calculated the CEO Pay Ratio to be 104.

The median employee used to calculate the 2019 CEO pay ratio left the Company during 2020, so we conducted the following process to identify the median employee for 2020. The date used to determine the median employee was December 31, 2020. We used annual salary rate as the consistently applied measure to determine the median employee. To account for employees paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, we used currency exchange rates as of December 31, 2020 to convert their compensation into U.S. dollars. We started with 10,356 full time, part-time and temporary employees who were paid directly by ITT or our subsidiaries, and also included contractors for whom ITT or our subsidiaries determine compensation, but were employed by third parties as of December 31, 2020.

We then excluded all 501 of our employees in Argentina, Poland, and Venezuela under an applicable exemption for limited numbers of non-U.S. employees. The excluded employees in Argentina, Poland, and Venezuela represented less than 5% of our total employee population. No cost of living adjustments were utilized in identifying our median employee or calculating the annual total compensation.

We identified the median employee to be a full-time hourly employee located in the U.S. We then determined the annual total compensation of the median employee, which included actual annual salary, overtime and company contributions toward benefits (medical and dental premiums and contributions to the employee’s 401(k) account). The total annual compensation of our median employee was determined to be $63,801. For 2020, the annual compensation for Mr. Savi was $6,625,380, which is shown in the Summary Compensation Table.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT67

COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL

COMMITTEE REPORT

ITT’s Compensation and Personnel Committee Report

ITT's Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee is responsible for the overall design and governance of the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation program, senior leadership development and talent management programs. The Compensation and Personnel Committee'sHuman Capital Committee’s primary objective is to establish a competitive executive compensation program that clearly links executive compensation to business performance and shareholder return. The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee considers and monitors appropriate risk factors in structuring compensation to discourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking behaviors and encourage long-term value creation.
Recommendation Regarding Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In performing its governance function, with regard to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee relied on statements and information prepared by the Company'sCompany’s management. It also relied on information provided by Pay Governance. The Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee recommended to the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company's 2016Company’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Proxy Statement.

This report is furnished by the members of the Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee.

■   Orlando D. Ashford (Chair)■   Geraud Darnis■   Nicholas C. Fanandakis
■   Mario Longhi
• Christina A. Gold (Chair)• Donald DeFosset, Jr.■   Rebecca A. McDonald
• Orlando D. Ashford• Richard P. Lavin■   Cheryl L. Shavers

2016 Non-Management Director Compensation
2020 NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The table below represents the 20162020 compensation for our non-management directors. As discussed in more detail in the narrative following the table, all non-management directors receive the same cash fees and stock awards for their service, which consists of a $100,000 annual cash retainer and an annual RSU award with a value of $100,000,$125,000, except for the following: Mr. MacInnis,Lavin, as Non-Executive Chairman, received an additional $62,500 cash payment and an additional RSU award with a value of $62,500; Mr. D'AloiaPowers as Audit Committee Chair, received an additional $15,000 cash payment; and Ms. GoldMr. Ashford as Compensation and PersonnelHuman Capital Committee Chair, received an additional $10,000 cash payment; and Mr. DeFosset as the Nominating and Governance Committee Chair received an additional $10,000 cash payment. As a management director, Ms. RamosMr. Savi does not receive compensation for Board service.

The total annual compensation of non-employee directors elected at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting in May was reduced by 20% effective from the annual meeting on May 15, 2020 through December 31, 2020 and then reinstated on a pro-rata basis for the balance of their term effective January 1, 2021.

Compensation is paid to non-management directors in a lump sum following the annual meeting at which they are elected. Non-management directors who join the Board of Directors during the course of a year receive their compensation promptly following their election, in amounts that are pro-rated to reflect their partial year of service



49



on the Board. Non-managementFor periods prior to 2020, our non-management directors were eligible to participate in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. Because of changes to the Plan described on page 50, for periods after 2020, non-management directors may alsoonly choose to defer receipt of either or both of their cash retainer and equity retainer. The grant date fair value of stock awards granted to non-management directors in 20162020 is provided in footnote (2) to the table below. Stock awards are composed of RSUs.
Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1)
Stock
Awards(2)
Total
Orlando D. Ashford$100,000
$100,014
$200,014
G. Peter D'Aloia115,000
100,014
215,014
Geraud Darnis100,000
100,014
200,014
Donald DeFosset, Jr.100,000
100,014
200,014
Nicholas C. Fanandakis(3)
66,667
66,680
133,347
Christina A. Gold110,000
100,014
210,014
Richard P. Lavin100,000
100,014
200,014
Frank T. MacInnis162,500
162,506
325,006
Rebecca A. McDonald100,000
100,014
200,014
Timothy H. Powers100,000
100,014
200,014

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT68
(1)

  Fees Earned or  Stock    
Name Paid in Cash(1)  Awards(2)  Total 
Orlando D. Ashford $110,000  $100,028  $210,028 
Geraud Darnis  96,875   100,028   196,903 
Donald DeFosset, Jr.  110,000   100,028   210,028 
Nicholas C. Fanandakis  96,875   100,028   196,903 
Christina A. Gold(3)         
Richard P. Lavin  156,250   150,041   306,291 
Mario Longhi  96,875   100,028   196,903 
Frank T. MacInnis(3)         
Rebecca A. McDonald  96,875   100,028   196,903 
Timothy H. Powers  114,375   100,028   214,403 
Cheryl L. Shavers  96,875   100,028   196,903 
Sabrina Soussan  96,875   100,028   196,903 

(1)Fees may be paid in cash at the time they are earned, or deferred, at the election of the director. Non-management directors may irrevocably elect deferral into an interest-bearing cash account or into the ITT Stock Fund, which is a tracking fund that invests in Company stock.
For periods after 2020, directors are no longer allowed to defer their cash retainers.
(2)Awards are made in RSUs and they reflect a grant date fair value computed in accordance with GAAP. The grant date fair value of the RSUs granted on May 11, 2016,15, 2020 was based on the date of our 2016 annual meeting, was $100,014. TheITT stock closing price of ITT stock on that$48.51. Non-management directors may elect to defer the receipt of their RSUs until a later date was $34.97. The equity component ofor when they leave the non-management director compensation program was increased from $90,000 to $100,000 in May 2016 after a review by Pay Governance of market comparison data. Non-management director compensation had been unchanged since prior to the Spin Transaction.
Board.
(3)Ms. Gold and Mr. Fanandakis was elected toMacInnis retired from the Board of Directors on October 20, 2016 and therefore he received compensation that was pro-rated to reflect his partial year of service onfollowing the Board for the 2016-2017 director term. He was paid cash of $66,667 and was granted RSUs on October 20, 2016 with a grant date fair value of $66,680 on the grant date. The closing price of ITT stock on that date was $34.16.2020 Annual Meeting.
Non-Management Director Stock Awards and Option Awards Outstanding at December

NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR STOCK AWARDS AND OPTION AWARDS OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31, 2016

Fiscal Year-End
Non-Management Director Name
Stock 
Awards
Option Awards
Orlando D. Ashford2,860

G. Peter D'Aloia12,396

Geraud Darnis2,860

Donald DeFosset, Jr.5,079

Nicholas C. Fanandakis1,952

Christina A. Gold20,997

Richard P. Lavin2,860

Frank T. MacInnis20,397
1,430
Rebecca A. McDonald5,031

Timothy H. Powers5,031

2020 FISCAL YEAR-END

Non-Management Director NameStock AwardsOption Awards
Orlando D. Ashford2,062
Geraud Darnis6,028
Donald DeFosset, Jr.9,181
Nicholas C. Fanandakis6,028
Richard P. Lavin7,059
Mario Longhi6,028
Rebecca A. McDonald10,598
Timothy H. Powers13,458
Cheryl L. Shavers2,062
Sabrina Soussan2,062

Outstanding stock awards include unvested RSUs granted under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan and vested but deferred restricted shares and RSUs granted under the 2011 Plan, the ITT 1996 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the Amended and Restated 2003 EquityOmnibus Incentive Plan. RSUs granted to non-management directors vest one business day prior to the next annual meeting. Unvested RSUs do not earn dividends or carry voting rights while unvested, however dividend equivalents are accrued during this period and are paid out in cash following vesting of the award.

ITT reimburses directors for expenses they incur to travel to and from Board, Committee and shareholder meetings and for other Company-business relatedCompany business-related expenses (including travel expenses of spouses if they are specifically invited to attend an event for appropriate business purposes).

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT69

50



Non-Management Director Stock Ownership Guidelines.  ITT's

NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

ITT’s stock ownership guidelines currently provide for non-management directors to achieve stock ownership levels of five times the annual base cash retainer amount within five years of joining the Board. Non-management directors receive a portion of their retainer in RSUs, which are paid in shares when the RSUs vest. Non-management directors are required to hold such shares until their total share ownership meets or exceeds the ownership guidelines. Both the guidelines, and compliance with the guidelines, are monitored periodically. All non-management directors with at least one full year of service on the Board of Directors own stock in the Company. Directors are also subject to the Company's policy prohibiting hedging and speculative trading in and out of the Company's securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options. The Company also prohibits directors from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

Indemnification and Insurance.

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE

As permitted by its By-laws, ITT indemnifies its directors to the fullfullest extent permitted by law and maintains insurance to protect the directors from liabilities, including certain instances where ITT could not otherwise indemnify them. All directors are covered under a non-contributory group accidental death and dismemberment policy that provides each of them with $1,000,000 of coverage. They may elect to purchase additional coverage under that policy. Non-management directors also may elect to participate in an optional non-contributory group life insurance plan that provides $100,000 of coverage.

HEDGING POLICY

Our directors are subject to the Company’s policy prohibiting hedging and speculative trading in and out of the Company’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options, as described on page 22.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT70

Stock OwnershipCONSIDERATION OF A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS

(PROXY ITEM NO. 4)

The following shareholder proposal will be voted on at the Annual Meeting if properly presented by or on behalf of the shareholder proponent. Other than minor formatting changes, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement as they were submitted to us, and we have not endeavored to correct any erroneous statements or typographical errors contained therein. Share holdings of the shareholder proponent, and where applicable, of co-filers, will be supplied upon request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary. Our Board of Directors Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders

has recommended a vote against the proposal for the reasons set forth following the proposal.

Clarifying Note from the Board of Directors

The following table showsshareholder proposal incorrectly identifies the beneficial ownership threshold needed to call a special shareholder meeting as 30%. The Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of our common stock, as of January 31, 2017, by each director, by eachIncorporation provide that the threshold to call a special meetings is 25% of the NEOs, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each non-management director or executive officer has been determined under the rules of the SEC, which provide that beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting or dispositive power, and any shares which the person would have the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise indicated, each non-management director or executive officer has sole dispositive and voting power or shares those powers with his or her spouse. No directors or executive officers have pledged any shares of common stock.
Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of Beneficial OwnershipPercent of Class
Total Shares Beneficially Owned
Shares Owned Directly(1)
Options(2)
Stock Units(3)
Denise L. Ramos620,603
134,628
465,865
20,110
*
Thomas M. Scalera151,612
32,029
115,848
3,735
*
Luca Savi49,909
15,714
29,970
4,225
*
Mary Beth Gustafsson26,220

13,405
12,815
*
Aris C. Chicles66,950
25,735
37,480
3,735
*
Orlando D. Ashford13,389
13,389


*
G. Peter D'Aloia13,782
4,246

9,536
*
Geraud Darnis11,658
11,658


*
Donald DeFosset, Jr.13,932
11,713

2,219
*
Nicholas C. Fanandakis



*
Christina A. Gold35,951
17,814

18,137
*
Richard P. Lavin7,393
7,393


*
Frank T. MacInnis39,580
22,400
1,430
15,750
*
Rebecca A. McDonald5,205
3,034

2,171
*
Timothy H. Powers2,728
557

2,171
*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (18 persons)1,079,021
306,075
676,847
96,099
1.2%
*Less than 1%
(1)Includes units held as of January 31, 2017 representing interests in the ITT Stock Fund held within the ITT Retirement Savings Plan.


51



(2)Exercisable within 60 days of January 31, 2017. The amounts for our executive officers include stock options that vested and became exercisable in March 2017.
(3)Reflects RSUs that vest or that may be settled within 60 days of January 31, 2017. The amounts for Ms. Ramos, Mr. Scalera, Mr. Chicles and Mr. Savi include RSUs that vested, and were settled in stock, in March 2017. Non-management directors' total shares beneficially owned include RSUs that have vested but for which settlement is deferred until a later date.
The principal occupation and certain other information about the nominees is set forth in "Election of Directors (Proxy Item No. 1)."
The following table gives information about each person or group of persons whom the Company knows to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding sharescapital stock of the Company.

Mr. John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Ave., No. 205 Redondo Beach, Calif. 90278 has submitted the following shareholder proposal:

Proposal 4 - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

Shareholders ask our board to take the steps necessary to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock basedthe power to call a special shareholder meeting. The Board of Directors would continue to have its existing power to call a special meeting.

Since the ITT annual meeting there has been a dramatic development that makes shareholder meetings so much easier for management with a substantial cost reduction. Special shareholder meeting can now be online shareholder meetings which are so much easier for management. The 2020 pandemic has resulted in an avalanche of online shareholder meetings.

Management is so well protected at online meetings that shareholders should have a corresponding greater flexibility in calling for a special shareholder meeting.

Management now has the option of screening out constructive criticism of management at a special shareholder meeting. Thus the core purpose of such a meeting can simply be the announcement of the vote.

For instance Goodyear management hit the mute button right in the middle of a formal shareholder proposal presentation at its 2020 shareholder meeting to bar constructive criticism.

Plus AT&T management would not even allow the proponents of shareholder proposals to read their proposals by telephone at the 2020 AT&T online annual meeting during pandemic travel restrictions.

Please see:

AT&T investors denied a dial-in as annual meeting goes online https://whbl.com/2020/04/17/att-investors-denied-a-dial-in-as-annual-meeting-goes-online/1007928/

The current stock ownership threshold of 30% of shares (that normally cast ballots at an annual meeting) to call for a special shareholder meeting can mean that more than 50% of shareholders must be contacted during a short window of time to simply call a special meeting. Plus many shareholders, who are convinced that a special meeting should be called, can make a small paperwork error that will disqualify them from counting toward the 30% ownership threshold that is now needed for a special meeting.

ITT shareholders need more flexibility in calling for a special meeting because we permanently lack a right to act by written consent. ITT is incorporated in Indiana and Indiana is backwards in shareholder rights and unfortunately fails to give shareholders any right to act by written consent.

Please vote yes:

Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement - Proposal 4

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

The Board has carefully considered the proposal and has concluded that the proposal is not in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. The Board believes that the amendment requested by this shareholder proposal is unnecessary for the following reasons:

Effective as of May 28, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to reduce the threshold to call a special meeting from 35% to 25% of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the Company.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT71
The 2018 amendment was approved by over 87% of the Company’s outstanding shares and followed a process of extensive engagement with shareholders on this topic, as well as an evaluation of the practices of other companies of comparable size, which led the Board to determine that 25% was the appropriate threshold for ITT.
We maintain strong corporate governance practices that, when coupled with our existing special meeting right, provide shareholders with a significant ability to raise important matters with our Board and management without the potential expense and risk associated with a lower special meeting threshold of 10%.

1.The Company’s shareholders overwhelmingly approved an appropriate special meeting right following shareholder outreach in 2018.

Effective as of May 28, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to reduce the threshold to call a special meeting from 35% to 25% of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the Company. The current version of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation are publicly available as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on informationForm 8-K that we filed by that entity with the SEC on May 25, 2018.

Recognizing that the dates indicated below.

Name and address of beneficial ownerNumber of Shares Beneficially Owned
Percent of Class(4)
Capital Research Global Investors(1)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
9,710,00911.00%
The Vanguard Group(2)
100 Vanguard Blvd
Malvern, PA 19355
7,485,6928.48%
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
6,730,1527.60%
(1)As reported on Amendment 3 to Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2017, Capital Research Global Investors has sole voting power with respect to 9,710,009 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 9,710,009 shares, and no shared voting or shared dispositive power with respect to any shares.
(2)As reported on Amendment 5 to Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2017, The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 52,944 shares, shared voting power with respect to 10,496 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,426,813 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 58,879 shares.
(3)As reported on Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed on January 25, 2017, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 6,399,748 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 6,730,152 shares, and no shared voting or dispositive power with respect to any shares.
(4)Calculations based on the Company's shares outstanding as of January 31, 2017.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
The membersspecial meeting right was of interest to many of our shareholders, prior to proposing the Company’s existing special meeting right in 2018, the Company analyzed the issue, including reviewing it with our major shareholders and advisors. During the Company’s shareholder engagement cycle, a number of the Company’s largest shareholders expressed a preference for a threshold that was lower than 35%. Most shareholders with whom the Company engaged indicated that they did not think there was a “one size fits all” rule in this area, and that an appropriate provision would be dependent on the size of the company, governance profile of the company, the company’s shareholder base, the Board’s viewpoint on the appropriate threshold and the balance between providing shareholders with access to this important right and avoiding undue expense and disruption to the Company. The 2018 amendment lowering the threshold to 25% was ultimately approved by over 87% of the Company’s outstanding shares.

The Board has also observed that the existing 25% threshold is the most prevalent threshold in the market and the Board believes that the Company’s existing special meeting provisions compare favorably with those of similarly situated companies.

Finally, the Board believes that a 25% threshold ensures that shareholders have a meaningful right to bring matters before all shareholders on an expedited basis, rather than waiting for the next annual meeting. At the same time, this threshold helps to ensure that the right to call a special meeting is exercised only when a sufficiently broad base of our shareholders have an interest in addressing a topic on an expedited basis. The Board also believes that calling a special meeting of shareholders is not a matter to be taken lightly, and that a special meeting should only be called by shareholders representing a substantial percentage of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock.

The Board of Directors believes that a 10% threshold would introduce a risk that a minority of shareholders could submit a meeting request covering agenda items relevant only to particular constituencies as opposed to shareholders generally. In addition, organizing and preparing for a special meeting imposes substantial legal and administrative costs and involves a significant commitment of management time and focus that could divert attention from our operations. Accordingly, the executive officersBoard believes that the existing 25% threshold strikes the appropriate balance between these competing concerns and persons who hold more than 10%reflects its fundamental commitment to robust corporate governance practices.

2.The Company has an established record of strong governance practices, particularly when it comes to Board accountability and shareholder engagement.

In considering the shareholder proposal, our Board encourages shareholders to consider the Company’s existing special meeting right in the context of the outstanding common stock are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, which requires them to file reports with respect to their ownership of, and transactionsother provisions already included in our common stock. Based on our recordsCompany’s Articles of Incorporation, By-laws, Corporate Governance Principles and other information, we believepractices that are designed to promote accountability of our Board and management to our investors and to foster shareholder engagement. These include the following highlights:

Shareholders already have the right to call special meetings at a reasonable 25% threshold;
Proxy access procedures reflecting input from our shareholders and containing terms that are consistent with those of other companies are available to shareholders under our By-laws;
A process exists for shareholders to submit recommendations of director candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee;
As described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, ITT has a strong shareholder engagement process;
We actively review and refresh our Board of Directors and have added six new independent directors since the beginning of 2015;
The independent Nominating and Governance Committee annually evaluates the Board and, in making decisions on the Board’s composition, considers the tenure, performance, contributions, experience, skill set, and commitment of each director;
Our Board is declassified and elected annually by a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections;
Our Board proactively engages with shareholders;
All members of the Board, other than the Chief Executive Officer, are independent (91% independent);
Our Board has a high degree of diversity;
There are no supermajority voting requirements in our Company’s Articles of Incorporation or By-laws; and  
Directors are subject to meaningful stock ownership requirements.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT72

CONCLUSION

The Board of Directors believes that, as described in 2016 our directorsdetail above, the Company’s existing special meeting right strikes the right balance between protecting shareholder rights and our executive officers who are subjectmitigating risk of abuse. The Company remains committed to Section 16(a) met all applicable filing requirements.maintaining strong corporate governance practices, and the Board believes the Company’s existing special meeting right, in conjunction with the Company’s other corporate governance practices, achieves this objective.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT73

Other Matters
OTHER MATTERS

Information about the Proxy StatementINFORMATION ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT & Voting
Proxy Statement
VOTING

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is furnished to the shareholders of record of ITT Inc., an Indiana corporation, in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company, for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 10, 2017.19, 2021. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually, via live webcast at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time at ITT Inc. Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604.

Why didwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ITT2021.

WHY DID I receive these proxy materials?RECEIVE THESE PROXY MATERIALS?

Beginning on or about March 27, 2017,April 5, 2021, this Proxy Statement is being mailed or made available, as the case may be, to shareholders who were shareholders as of March 13, 2017,22, 2021, the record date, as part of the Board of Directors'Directors’ solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting, including any



52



adjournments adjournment or postponementspostponement thereof. This Proxy Statement and the ITT 20162020 Annual Report to Shareholders (the "Annual Report"“Annual Report”) and Annual Report on Form 10-K (which have been furnished to shareholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting) contain information that the Board of Directors believes is relevant to shareholders in voting on the matters to be addressed at the Annual Meeting.
Who is entitled to vote?

WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?

You can vote if you owned shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock as of the close of business on March 13, 2017,22, 2021, the record date.

How do

HOW DO I get admitted toATTEND THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING?

The Annual Meeting will be held virtually and will be accessible through the Internet. Shareholders may attend the Annual Meeting?    Only shareholders of recordMeeting online, vote their shares electronically, and submit their questions during the meeting by visiting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ITT2021 and entering the 16-digit control number on their notice or beneficial ownersproxy card. You are encouraged to join the Annual Meeting 15 minutes before the start of the Company's common stock asAnnual Meeting to allow time to log-in and test your device’s audio system.

The Annual Meeting is being held in a virtual-only format due to public health and travel concerns regarding COVID-19 and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments have imposed, restricting travel and limiting the number of persons that may gather at public events. In light of the record date mayvirtual-only meeting format, you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. YouHowever, we will need an admission ticket or proof of ownership to enteroffer shareholders the same participation opportunities during the virtual Annual Meeting. An admission ticket is attached to your proxy card if you hold shares directly in your name as a shareholder of record. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (a "Notice"), your Notice is your admission ticket. Meeting that were provided at our past in-person meetings.

We encourage you to vote your proxy as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, but please keep the admission ticket and bring it with you to thevirtual Annual Meeting.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT74
If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a broker, bank or other holder of record, you must present proof of your ownership of common stock, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. Please note that if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person and would like to vote there, you will need to bring a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record as explained below. If your shares are held beneficially and you would rather have an admission ticket, you can obtain one in advance by mailing a written request, along with proof of your ownership of common stock, to:
Back to Contents
ITT Inc.
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604
Attn: Corporate Secretary
Shareholders also must present a form of photo identification, such as a driver's license, in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. No cameras, recording equipment, large bags or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.

Voting Information
How do

VOTING INFORMATION

HOW DO I vote?    VOTE?

Shareholders may vote using any of the following methods:

By telephone or on the Internet

BY TELEPHONE OR ON THE INTERNET

You can vote by calling the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card or Notice. Please have your proxy card or Notice handy when you call. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

The website for Internet voting is www.proxyvote.com. Please have your proxy card or Notice handy when you go online. As with telephone voting, you can confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you also can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials.

Telephone and Internet voting facilities for shareholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 9, 2017.18, 2021. The availability of telephone and Internet voting for beneficial owners will depend on the voting processes of your broker, bank or other holder of record. Therefore, the Company recommends that you follow the voting instructions in the materials you receive.

If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.

By mail

BY MAIL

If you received your Annual Meeting materials by mail, you may complete, sign and date the proxy card or voting instruction card and return it in the prepaid envelope. If you are a shareholder of record and you return your signed proxy card but do not indicate your voting preferences, the persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares represented by that proxy as recommended by the Board of Directors.

In person at

DURING THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING

You may attend the Annual Meeting

All shareholders may online, vote in person atyour shares electronically, and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ITT2021 and entering the 16-digit control number on your notice or proxy card. You are encouraged to join the Annual Meeting. Meeting 15 minutes before the start of the Annual Meeting to allow time to log-in and test your device’s audio system.

You may also be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a proper proxy designating that person. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record and present it to the



53



inspectors of election with your ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to vote as soon as possible, even if you intend to attend the virtual Annual Meeting in person.
By granting a proxy or submitting voting instructions
Meeting.

BY GRANTING A PROXY OR SUBMITTING VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares held in street name, by submitting voting instructions to your bank, broker or other holder of record.

What is the difference between a registered owner and a beneficial owner?

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A REGISTERED OWNER AND A BENEFICIAL OWNER?

If your shares are registered in your name with ITT'sITT’s transfer agent, Wells Fargo Shareholder Services,Computershare, you are a "registered“registered owner," also sometimes referred to as the "shareholder“shareholder of record"record” of those shares.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the "beneficial owner"“beneficial owner” of those shares, which are also sometimes referred to as being held in “street name,” and this Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents have been provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.

How many votes do

HOW MANY VOTES DO I have?HAVE?

You have one vote for every share of common stock that you own as of the record date.

Why does the Board solicit proxies from shareholders?

WHY DOES THE BOARD SOLICIT PROXIES FROM SHAREHOLDERS?

Since it is impractical for all shareholders to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, and vote in person, the Board of Directors recommends that you appoint the two people named on the accompanying proxy card to act as your proxies at the Annual Meeting.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT75
What items are on the agenda for the Annual Meeting?
Back to Contents

WHAT ITEMS ARE ON THE AGENDA FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING?

There are four formal items scheduled to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting as described in the Notice of 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, there are no other matters that the Board of Directors intends to present, or has reason to believe others will present, at the Annual Meeting. If you have returned your signed and completed proxy card and other matters are properly presented for voting at the Annual Meeting, the people named on the accompanying proxy card (or, if applicable, their substitutes), will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

How will my shares be voted at the Annual Meeting?

HOW WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

At the Annual Meeting, the people named on the accompanying proxy card (or if applicable, their substitutes), will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends, which is set forth under "Proxy“Proxy Statement Highlights"Executive Summary” on page 17 of this Proxy Statement. With respect to any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxy.

What if

WHAT IF I change my mind?CHANGE MY MIND?

As a holder of record of common stock, you may revoke or change your proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting by filing a notice of revocation or another signed, later-dated proxy card with the Corporate Secretary of the Company, at the Company'sCompany’s principal executive offices as listed on the first page of this Proxy Statement. You may also revoke your proxy by attending the virtual Annual Meeting and voting in person.during the meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of common stock, you should follow the voting directions you will receive from your broker, bank or other holder of record along with the Company'sCompany’s proxy solicitation materials. As previously noted, you will need a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record if you prefer to cast your vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

How many shares of

HOW MANY SHARES OF ITT stock are outstanding?STOCK ARE OUTSTANDING?

As of March 13, 2017,22, 2021, the record date, 88,664,46686,053,958 shares of common stock were outstanding.

How many holders of

HOW MANY HOLDERS OF ITT outstanding shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?OUTSTANDING SHARES MUST BE PRESENT TO HOLD THE ANNUAL MEETING?

In order to conduct business at the Annual Meeting, it is necessary to have a quorum. To have a quorum, shareholders entitled to cast a majority of votes at the Annual Meeting must be present in personat the virtual meeting or by proxy. The inspectors of election appointed for the Annual Meeting will separately tabulate all affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and "broker“broker non-votes." Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business.

What is a "broker non-vote"

WHAT IS A “BROKER NON-VOTE”?

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares with respect to certain items of business. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any item of business on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a broker non-vote. In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the NYSE.



54



If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte as the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote without instructions from you on the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company'sCompany’s named executive officers, or the advisory vote regarding the frequency of future shareholder votes on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers without instructions from you,proposal, and in whicheach case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these items of business.

If you hold shares of common stock through a broker, bank or other holder of record, follow the voting instructions you receive from that organization.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT76
How many votes are required to elect Directors? How many votes are required for other agenda items to pass?
Back to Contents
Election of Directors.

HOW MANY VOTES ARE REQUIRED TO ELECT DIRECTORS? HOW MANY VOTES ARE REQUIRED FOR OTHER AGENDA ITEMS TO PASS?

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company'sCompany’s By-laws provide that in uncontested elections, a director nominee shall be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders represented in personat the virtual meeting or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A "majority“majority of the votes cast"cast” means that the number of votes cast "for"“for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast "against"“against” that nominee (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast with respect to that director nominee). The By-laws further provide that in uncontested elections, any director nominee who fails to be elected by a majority, but who also is a director at the time, shall promptly provide a written conditional resignation, as a holdover director, to the ChairmanChair of the Board or the Corporate Secretary, and remain a director until a successor is elected and qualified. The Nominating and Governance Committee shall promptly consider the resignation and all relevant facts and circumstances concerning any vote and the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. After consideration, the Nominating and Governance Committee shall make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Nominating and Governance Committee'sCommittee’s recommendation no later than its next regularly scheduled Board meeting (after certification of the shareholder vote) or within 90 days after certification of the shareholder vote, whichever is earlier, and the Board will promptly publicly disclose its decision and the reasons for its decision. As discussed above, brokers (and many banks and other record holders of "street name"“street name” shares that follow the applicable NYSE voting rules for member brokers) do not have discretionary voting power with respect to director elections unless they have customer voting instructions. This means that, without your voting instructions on this matter, a broker non-vote will occur because your broker (or bank or other holder of record) does not have the power to vote your shares on the election of directors. As a result, it is very important that you return voting instructions relating to the election of directors to your broker, bank or other holder of record.

All Other Matters.

ALL OTHER MATTERS

The proposals relating to the selection of the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, the compensation of the Company'sCompany’s named executive officers and the frequency of future shareholder votes relating to theCompany's named executive officersproposal are each advisory in nature and non-binding.

For each of these proposals, to pass, the votes cast in favor of the proposal must exceed the votes cast against the proposal.proposal in order for the proposal to be deemed approved. If you abstain from voting or if there is a broker non-vote on any matter, your abstention or broker non-vote will not affect the outcome of such vote, because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast.

How do

HOW DO I vote ifVOTE IF I am a participant in theAM A PARTICIPANT IN THE ITT Retirement Savings Plan?RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN?

If you participate in the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, (formerly the ITT Corporation Retirement Savings Plan), your plan trustee will vote the ITT shares credited to your ITT Retirement Savings Plan account in accordance with your voting instructions, except as otherwise provided in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"(“ERISA”). The trustee will vote the shares on your behalf because you are the beneficial owner, not the shareholder of record, of the shares held by the ITT Retirement Savings Plan. The trustee votes the shares held in your ITT Retirement Savings Plan account for which no voting instructions are received ("(“Undirected Shares"Shares”) in the same proportion as the shares for which the trustee receives voting instructions, except as otherwise provided in accordance with ERISA. Under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, participants are "named fiduciaries"“named fiduciaries” to the extent of their authority to direct the voting of ITT shares credited to their savings plan accounts and their proportionate share of Undirected Shares. By submitting voting instructions by telephone, the Internet or by signing and returning the voting instruction card, you direct the trustee of the ITT Retirement Savings Plan to vote these shares, in personat the virtual meeting or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.

ITT Retirement Savings Plan participants should mail their confidential voting instruction card to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. ("Broadridge"(“Broadridge”), acting as tabulation agent, or vote by telephone or Internet. Instructions from ITT Retirement Savings Plan Participants must be received by Broadridge no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2017.



55



How many shares are held by participants in the18, 2021.

HOW MANY SHARES ARE HELD BY PARTICIPANTS IN THE ITT Retirement Savings Plan?RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN?

As of March 13, 2017,22, 2021, the record date, the ITT Retirement Savings Plan held 193,566138,804 shares of common stock (approximately 0.22%0.16% of the outstanding shares). J.P. Morgan ChaseGreat West Trust Company is trustee of the ITT Retirement Savings Plan.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT77
Who counts the votes? Is my vote confidential?
Back to Contents

WHO COUNTS THE VOTES? IS MY VOTE CONFIDENTIAL?

In accordance with the By-laws, the Company will appoint two Inspectors of Election, who may be officers or employees of the Company, and they will tabulate the votes. The Inspectors of Election monitor the voting and also certify whether the votes of shareholders are kept in confidence in compliance with ITT'sITT’s confidential voting policy.

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

WHO WILL PAY FOR THE COST OF THIS PROXY SOLICITATION?

ITT will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our directors, officers or employees in personvirtually or by telephone, mail, electronic transmission and/or facsimile transmission. Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022, has been retained to assist in soliciting proxies for a fee of $12,500, plus distribution costs and other costs and expenses.

What is "householding" and how does it affect me?

WHAT IS “HOUSEHOLDING” AND HOW DOES IT AFFECT ME?

The Company has adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called "householding."“householding.” Under this procedure, beneficial shareholders who have the same address and last name and who do not participate in electronic delivery or Internet access of proxy materials will receive only one copy of the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report and Proxy Statement unless one or more of these shareholders notifies the Company that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. This procedure is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and processing costs, as well as natural resources.

Each shareholder who participates in householding will continue to receive a separate proxy card or Notice. Your consent to householding is perpetual unless you revoke it. You may revoke your consent at any time by contacting Broadridge, either by calling toll-free at (800) 542-1061, or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of your response, after which you will receive an individual copy of the proxy materials.

Why did

WHY DID I receive a "Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials" but no proxy materials?   RECEIVE A “NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS” BUT NO PROXY MATERIALS?

We distribute our proxy materials to certain shareholders by giving notice to those shareholders that they may access their proxy materials on the Internet. This so-called "Notice“Notice and Access"Access” approach, which is permitted by SEC rules, conserves natural resources and reduces our costs of printing and distributing the proxy materials, while providing a convenient method of accessing the materials and voting to shareholders. On March 27, 2017,April 5, 2021, we mailed a "Notice“Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials"Materials” to participating shareholders, containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet.

How do

HOW DO I receive proxy materials electronically in the future?RECEIVE PROXY MATERIALS ELECTRONICALLY IN THE FUTURE?

This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report are available online at www.proxyvote.com. Instead of receiving future proxy statements and accompanying materials by mail, most shareholders can elect to receive an e-mail that will provide electronic links to them. Opting to receive your proxy materials online will conserve natural resources and will save us the cost of producing documents and mailing them to you, and will also give you an electronic link to the proxy voting site.

Shareholders of Record.

SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD

You may sign up for the service by logging onto the Internet at www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com. Please have your proxy card handy when you go online.

Beneficial Owners.

BENEFICIAL OWNERS

You also may be able to receive copies of these documents electronically. Check the information provided in the proxy materials sent to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record regarding the availability of this service or contact them regarding electronic delivery of materials.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT78
How does a shareholder propose matters for consideration at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders?
Back to Contents
Proposals to be included in our proxy statement. 

HOW DOES A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSE MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?

PROPOSALS TO BE INCLUDED IN OUR PROXY STATEMENT

Under SEC rules, if a shareholder wants us to include a proposal in our proxy statement for presentation at our 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders, the proposal must be received by us by November 27, 2017.December 6, 2021. Any such proposal must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.

Proposals to be brought before the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders. 

PROPOSALS TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

A shareholder seeking to introduce an item of business at the 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders must comply with the procedures set forth in our By-laws. If you intend to propose an item of business to be presented at our 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders, you must notify us of your intention, in writing, on or after November 27, 2017,December 6, 2021, but not later than December 27, 2017.January 5, 2022. In the event that the date of the 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the Annual Meeting, such notice must be received not earlier than 120 calendar days prior to the 20182022 annual meeting and not later than 90 calendar days prior to the 20182022 annual meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which public announcement of the date of the 20182022 annual meeting is first made.



56



For any special meeting of shareholders, the item of business must be received no earlier than 120 calendar days nor later than 90 calendar days prior to the date of the special meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which the public announcement of the date of the special meeting is first made.

How does a shareholder nominate directors for the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders?
Director nominations for inclusion in our proxy statement.

HOW DOES A SHAREHOLDER NOMINATE DIRECTORS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?

DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR INCLUSION IN OUR PROXY STATEMENT

In February 2016, we amended our By-laws to implement "proxy“proxy access," which allows a shareholder or group of shareholders meeting certain conditions to nominate directors for election at annual meetings of shareholders using our proxy statement. This provision allows a shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, to nominate up to two director candidates or, if greater, up to 20% of the number of directors then serving on our Board of Directors, if the shareholder or group has owned continuously for at least three years a number of shares equal to at least three percent of our outstanding common stock measured as of the date we receive the nomination. The number of director candidates who may be nominated under our proxy access By-law will be reduced by the number of director nominations made under our advance notice By-law, as described in the following section.

If you intend to nominate a director for election at the 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders using our proxy access By-law, you must submit the nomination, along with the other materials required by our By-laws, on or after October 28, 2017,November 6, 2021, but not later than November 27, 2017.

Director nominations to be brought before the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders.December 6, 2021.

DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

If you intend to nominate a director for consideration at the 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders, you must notify us in writing of your intention to do so and provide us with the information required by our advance notice By-law on or after November 27, 2017,December 6, 2021, but not later than December 27, 2017.January 5, 2022. In the event that the date of the 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the Annual Meeting, such notice must be received not earlier than 120 calendar days prior to the 20182022 annual meeting and not later than 90 calendar days prior to the 20182022 annual meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which public announcement of the date of the 20182022 annual meeting is first made.

For any special meeting of shareholders, a nomination to be brought before the meeting must be received no earlier than 120 calendar days nor later than 90 calendar days prior to the date of the special meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which the public announcement of the date of the special meeting is first made.

Note that any such nominations will not be included in or voted through the Company'sCompany’s proxy materials.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT79
What information must
Back to Contents

WHAT INFORMATION MUST I submit with a proposal or nomination? SUBMIT WITH A shareholder'sPROPOSAL OR NOMINATION?

A shareholder’s submission of a proposal or director nomination must include information specified in our By-laws concerning the proposal or nomination, as the case may be, and information as to the shareholder'sshareholder’s ownership of common stock. Any person considering submission of a proposal for an item of business or a nomination to be considered at a shareholder meeting should carefully review our By-laws. We will not entertain any proposals or nominations at the 20182022 annual meeting of shareholders that do not meet these requirements. The By-laws are available upon request, free of charge, from ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The By-laws were also filed as Exhibit 3.23.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K that we filed with the SEC on May 16, 2016,December 15, 2020, which is available, free of charge, on the SEC'sSEC’s website, www.sec.gov, and our Investor Relations website, www.itt.com/investorsinvestors/corporate-governance.

Nominations of directors and notices relating thereto must meet all other qualifications and requirements of the Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Principles, the committee charters and Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act. Any shareholder nominees will be evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board using the same standards as it uses for all other director nominees. These standards are discussed in further detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading of "Corporate“Corporate Governance and Related Matters—DirectorDirectors’ Qualification and Selection and Composition."

Where shouldProcess.”

WHERE SHOULD I send a shareholder proposal or director nomination for the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders? SEND A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL OR DIRECTOR NOMINATION FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?

If you intend to submit a proposal or director nomination, you must send the proposal or nomination, along with all information required by our By-laws, to our principal executive offices at:

ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary. We strongly encourage any shareholder interested in submitting a proposal or director nomination to contact our Corporate Secretary in advance of the above deadlines to discuss the proposal, and shareholders may want to consult knowledgeable counsel with regard to the detailed requirements of applicable securities laws and the Company'sCompany’s By-laws. Submitting a shareholder proposal or nomination does not guarantee that we will include it in our Proxy Statement.



57



The chairman of the Annual Meeting may refuse to allow the transaction of any business, or to acknowledge the nomination of any person, not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures.
Who can help answer my additional questions?

WHO CAN HELP ANSWER MY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS?

If you have any additional questions about the Annual Meeting or how to vote, please call our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, toll-free at 888-750-5834. Banks and brokers may call collect at 212-750-5833.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT80

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CERTAIN SHAREHOLDERS

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of January 31, 2021, by each director, by each of the NEOs, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each non-management director or executive officer has been determined under the rules of the SEC, which provide that beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting or dispositive power, and any shares which the person would have the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise indicated, each non-management director or executive officer has sole dispositive and voting power, or shares those powers with his or her spouse. No directors or executive officers have pledged any shares of common stock.

  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership 
Name of Beneficial Owner Total Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 Shares Owned
Directly(1)
  Options(2)  Stock Units(3) Percent of
Class
Luca Savi  107,451   16,685   53,585   37,181   * 
Emmanuel Caprais  5,702   1,699      4,003   * 
Mary Beth Gustafsson  46,763   28,660      18,103   * 
Ryan Flynn  6,278   3,795      2,483   * 
George Hanna  16,435   12,384   2,190   1,861   * 
Thomas M. Scalera  67,225   39,112      28,113   * 
Orlando D. Ashford  16,215   16,215         * 
Geraud Darnis  21,054   17,088      3,966   * 
Donald DeFosset, Jr.  22,891   15,772      7,119   * 
Nicholas C. Fanandakis  8,408   4,442      3,966   * 
Richard P. Lavin  16,694   12,728      3,966   * 
Mario Longhi  5,444   1,478      3,966   * 
Rebecca A. McDonald  14,661   6,125      8,536   * 
Timothy H. Powers  11,971   575      11,396   * 
Cheryl L. Shavers  3,390   3,390         * 
Sabrina Soussan  2,044   2,044         * 
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (19 persons)  330,045   153,888   55,775   120,383   0.5%
*Less than 1%
(1)Includes units held as of January 31, 2021 representing interests in the ITT Stock Fund held within the ITT Retirement Savings Plan.
(2)All options shown in this table are vested. The Company no longer grants options, and there are no unvested option grants outstanding.
(3)Reflects PSUs and RSUs that vest or that may be settled within 60 days of January 31, 2021. The amounts for Mr. Savi, Mr. Caprais, Ms. Gustafsson, Mr. Flynn, Mr. Hanna and Mr. Scalera include RSUs and PSUs that vested, and were settled in stock during February and March 2021. Non-management directors’ total shares beneficially owned include RSUs that have vested but for which settlement is deferred until a later date.

The principal occupation and certain other information about the nominees is set forth in “Election of Directors (Proxy Item No. 1).”

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT81
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Back to Contents

The following table gives information about each person or group of persons whom the Company knows to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock based on information filed by that entity with the SEC on the dates indicated below.

  Number of Shares Percent of
Name and address of beneficial owner Beneficially Owned Class(4)
FMR LLC(1)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
  9,874,750   11.42%
The Vanguard Group(2)
100 Vanguard Blvd
Malvern, PA 19355
  8,221,369   9.50%
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
  7,039,764   8.14%
(1)As reported on Schedule 13G filed on February 8, 2021, FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 1,356,694 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 9,874,750 shares, and no shared voting or dispositive power with respect to any shares.
(2)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 2021, The Vanguard Group has shared voting power with respect to 57,703 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 8,097,147 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 124,222 shares.
(3)As reported on Schedule 13G filed on January 29, 2021, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 6,740,501 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,039,764 shares, and no shared voting or dispositive power with respect to any shares.
(4)Calculations based on the Company’s shares issued and outstanding of 86,497,192 as of January 31, 2021.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following sets forth information concerning the shares of common stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016.

 Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsWeighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsNumber of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plans:   
Approved by Security Holders(1)
2,398,858(2)
$30.57(3)
38,489,887(4)
Not Approved by Security Holders
Total2,398,858$30.5738,489,887
2020.

  Number of Securities to be Issued
Upon Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and Rights
 Weighted-Average Exercise
Price of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plans:         
Approved by Security Holders(1)  941,833(2)      $32.22(3)   37,180,701(4) 
Not Approved by Security Holders         
Total  941,833  $32.22   37,180,701 
(1)
(1)Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders include the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Since the approval of the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, no additional awards will be granted under the ITT Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2)This amount includes 1,450,376165,569 shares of common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, 660,895401,055 shares of common stock that are deliverable under restricted stock unitoutstanding RSU awards and 287,587375,209 shares of common stock that may be issued under outstanding performance units,PSU awards, which reflects the 2014 performance units2018 PSU awards at their actual 0%159% payout and the 20152019 and 2016 performance units2020 PSU awards at the target (100%) number of shares that may be issuable under such awards. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of the total number of outstanding stock options was 7.83.2 years as disclosed in Note 1617, Long-Term Incentive Employee Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's 2016Company’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The number of shares, if any, to be issued pursuant to outstanding performance unitsPSU awards can range from zero to 200% of the units initially awarded based on our achievement, over a three-year period, of the stated performance goals described in this Proxy Statement.
(3)The weighted-average exercise price pertains only to outstanding stock options and not to outstanding restricted stock units or performance stock units, which by their nature have no exercise price.
(4)This amount represents the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to equity awards that may be granted in the future under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT82

FormFORM 10-K

The Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 20162020 fiscal year with the SEC on February 17, 2017.19, 2021. A copy of the Company'sCompany’s Form 10-K (without exhibits or documents incorporated by reference) is included in the 20162020 Annual Report to Shareholders that is being delivered or made available via the Internet concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all shareholders.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

lorisignature.jpg

Lori B. Marino

Mary Beth Gustafsson

Senior Vice President, General Counsel,

Corporate Secretary

and Chief Compliance Officer

Dated: March 27, 2017

April 5, 2021

ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENT83



58



Appendix A

List of Companies Utilized from the Willis Towers Watson Compensation Data Bank (CDB) Analysis

APPENDIX A

LIST OF COMPANIES UTILIZED FROM THE WILLIS TOWERS WATSON COMPENSATION SURVEY

2020 BENCHMARK GROUP

(BENCHMARK DATA WAS SUBMITTED BY INDUSTRIALS, MATERIALS, AND ENERGY COMPANIES WITH REVENUE BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY $1.25 & $5.0 BILLION IN 2019 AND AGED TO REFLECT THE 2020 MARKET)

Aera EnergyGracoPeabody Energy
Aerojet RocketdyneGrafTech InternationalPinnacle West Capital
2016 Benchmark Group — Willis Towers Watson CDB
(Industrials, Materials, and Energy Companies with Revenue Between Approximately $1.25 & $5.0 Billion)
Allegheny Technologies
GreifPNM Resources
A.O. SmithALLETEExelisRollins
ABM IndustriesGrupo FluidraExterranRowan Companies
AllegionFortune Brands Home & SecuritySensata TechnologiesPolyOne
Alliant TechsystemsEnergyGATXShawCorHawaiian Electric IndustriesPortland General Electric
Americas StyrenicsGlatfelterSigma-Aldrich
AMETEKGranite ConstructionSnap-on
Armstrong World IndustriesH.B. FullerSonoco ProductsRayonier Advanced Materials
Axiall CorporationAshlandHarscoSpirit AirlinesHelmerich & PayneRev Group
Babcock & WilcoxAtmos EnergyHerman MillerSPX
Boise CascadeHexcelSteelcaseRexnord Corporation
ChemturaBlack HillsHNIStolt-NielsenHillenbrandSalt River Project
CintasBremboHubbellSunCoke EnergyIDEX CorporationSchmolz + Bickenbach
Clearwater Paper CorporationBWX TechnologiesIMISouth Jersey Industries
CabotInnospecSouthwest Gas
CAEInternational Flavors & FragrancesToroSpire
ColfaxCanadian SolarItronSPX Corporation
CF IndustriesJEASPX FLOW
Cleveland-CliffsKennametalStolt-Nielsen
CobhamKinross GoldTerex
Cooper Standard AutomotiveKronos WorldwideTimken
CPS EnergyLonzaTimkenSteel
Curtiss-WrightMagellan Midstream PartnersTransocean
Delphi TechnologiesMeritorTrinity Industries
CubicDometic GroupKinross GoldTronoxMesser GroupTriumph Group
Curtiss-WrightDonaldsonMagellan Midstream PartnersUnited Launch Alliance
CytecMRC Global IncMeritorUnited Rentals
DeluxeNortekUSG Corporation
Donaldson CompanyEnable Midstream PartnersPallNew Jersey ResourcesVallourec
EQT CorporationUTi WorldwideNiSourceValvoline
EnergenEvergyPitney BowesNoble EnergyVisteon
First SolarNuStar EnergyVulcan Materials
Energy SolutionsFugroPolyOneWestlake Chemical
EnLink MidstreamOGE EnergyRegal-BeloitWorthington Industries
EquifaxRockwell CollinsXylem
Esterline TechnologiesGenesis Energy 



ittlogobwa2017.jpg

ITT INC.
1133 WESTCHESTER AVENUE
WHITE PLAINS, NY 10604
WWW.ITT.COM
WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING. BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.
Telephone and Internet voting are available through 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 9, 2017. Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote the shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. If you vote your proxy by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need to mail back your proxy card.
VOTE BY TELEPHONE — 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call.
VOTE BY INTERNET — www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to:
Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:ONE Gas E00055-P72194KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDSW.R. Grace
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED
ITT INC.Goldcorp    

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of these 10 nominees:ITT INC.  |  2021 PROXY STATEMENTThe Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3:ForAgainstAbstain
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Proposal 2: Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the 2017 fiscal year
¨¨¨
Nominees:ForAgainstAbstain
1a.   Orlando D. Ashford¨¨¨
1b.  Geraud Darnis¨¨¨
Proposal 3: Approval of an advisory vote on executive compensation
¨¨¨
1c.  Donald DeFosset, Jr.¨¨¨
1d. Nicholas C.
       Fanandakis
¨¨¨The Board of Directors recommends a vote for ONE YEAR on Proposal 4:OneTwoThreeAbstain
1e.  Christina A. Gold¨¨¨
Proposal 4: Advisory vote on the frequency of future shareholder votes on executive compensation
¨¨¨¨
1f.  Richard P. Lavin¨¨¨
1g.  Frank T. MacInnis¨¨¨
1h.  Rebecca A. McDonald¨¨¨
1i.  Timothy H. Powers¨¨¨
1j.  Denise L. Ramos¨¨¨
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated:
YesNo
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting:¨¨
(NOTE: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear(s) on this Proxy Card. When signing as attorney, executor, officer, administrator, trustee, custodian or guardian, please indicate full title. If there is more than one named shareholder, all should sign unless evidence or authority to sign on behalf of others is attached.)
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners, if applicable)Date84


ittlogobwa2017.jpg

ADMISSION TICKET
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Wednesday, May 10, 2017
9:00 a.m., Eastern Time
ITT Inc. Headquarters
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604
Shareholders will be admitted to the Annual Meeting beginning at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time.
If you wish to attend, please plan to arrive early since seating will be limited. For directions, contact us at (914) 641-2000.
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please bring this admission ticket with you.
Note: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please indicate your intention to attend by marking the appropriate box on the attached proxy card. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please bring, in addition to this Admission Ticket, a proper form of identification. The use of video, still photography or audio recording at the Annual Meeting is not permitted. For the safety of attendees, all bags, packages and briefcases are subject to inspection.
This Admission Ticket should not be returned with your proxy but should be retained and brought with you to the Annual Meeting.
Important Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at ITT Inc. Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604:
The proxy materials for ITT's 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including the 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders and the 2017 Notice and Proxy Statement are available on the Internet. To view these proxy materials, please visit www.proxyvote.com.
 

ittlogobwa2017.jpg
 
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ITT INC.
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD MAY 10, 2017
The shareholder(s) whose signature(s) appear(s) on the reverse side of this proxy form hereby appoint(s) Thomas M. Scalera and Mary Beth Gustafsson, or either of them, each with full power of substitution as proxies, to vote all shares of ITT Inc. common stock that the shareholder(s) would be entitled to vote on all matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements. The proxies are authorized to vote in accordance with the specifications indicated by the shareholder(s) on the reverse side of this form. If this form is signed and returned by the shareholder(s), and no specifications are indicated, the proxies are authorized to vote as recommended by the Board of Directors. In either case, if this form is signed and returned, the proxies thereby will be authorized to vote in their discretion on any other matters that may be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting and at adjournments or postponements.
For participants in the ITT Retirement Savings Plan:
Under the savings plan, participants are "named fiduciaries" to the extent of their authority to direct the voting of ITT shares credited to their savings plan accounts and their proportionate share of allocated shares for which no direction is received and unallocated shares, if any (together, "Undirected Shares"). ITT Retirement Savings Plan participants should mail their confidential voting instruction card to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., acting as tabulation agent, or vote by telephone or Internet. Instructions must be received by Broadridge before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2016. The trustee of the savings plan will vote Undirected Shares in the same proportion as the shares for which directions are received, except as otherwise provided in accordance with ERISA. By submitting voting instructions by telephone, Internet, or by signing and returning this proxy form, you direct the trustee of the savings plan to vote these shares, in person or by proxy, as designated herein, at the Annual Meeting.
The Trustee will exercise its discretion in voting on any other matter that may be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting and at adjournments or postponements.
Address Changes / Comments:
(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
(Continued and to be dated and signed on the reverse side.)